Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Psychology > relationships > Flashcards

relationships Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
AP® Psychology flashcards GRE® Psychology flashcards Psychology 101 flashcards
1
Q

What is Anisogamy?

(Evolutionary Theory)

A

Refers to the difference between male and female reproductive sex cells (two types of gametes which differ from each other, in size and form)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is Natural Selection?

(Evolutionary Theory)

A

Certain physical and psychological traits have been passed down from one generation to another due to their advantages in survival and reproduction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is Sexual Selection?

(Evolutionary Theory)

A

Certain physical and psychological traits that have been passed down from one generation to another, due to their advantage in attracting a mate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the two types of Sexual Selection?

(Evolutionary Theory)

A
  1. Intersexual Selection: (between sexes) possessing certain characteristics to attract a mate
  2. Intrasexual Selection: (within a sex) outcompeting other males
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was Buss’s study into Evolutionary Theory?

A

A meta-analysis where he surveyed over 10,000 adults in 33 countries: the questionnaire had 2 parts:

  1. Biological data, mate reference and ranking 18 characteristics
  2. Rating 1-13 most to least desirable

The results were analysed by US researchers who were unaware of the hypothesis. Finding that females universally put more importance on resource-related characteristics in a partner, such as ambition, high intelligence and good financial prospects. Males, however, preferred younger mates and put more value on signs of reproduction and fertility, such as attractiveness and modesty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What support is there for intersexual selection?
- Clark and Hatfield

(Evolutionary Theory)

A

Two people of both sexes went around a university campus and said this to individuals:

“I’ve noticed you around campus and think you’re really attractive. Will you have sex with me tonight?”

75% of males agreed to the proposal, whereas no females did. This supports intersexual selection as it suggests females are choosier than males when it comes to selecting sexual partners and that males have evolved different strategies to ensure reproductive success

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is Sexual Dimorphism?

(Physical Attractiveness)

A

Physical differences between the sexes. Males have evolved over time to be larger as a result of a polygynous (men with multiple partners) mating system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is The Golden Ratio?

(Physical Attractiveness)

A

Is a way of distinguishing attractiveness, founded by Leonardo Fibonacci. People with more symmetrical features are seen to be more genetically fit, this is because our genes are designed to make us develop in a symmetrical way - but disease and infection during physical development can cause small imperfections and asymmetries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is The Halo Effect?

(Physical Attractiveness)

A

“What is beautiful is good”

Describes a psychological phenomenon based around attractiveness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is Matching Hypothesis?

(Physical Attractiveness)

A

Walster, 1966:

We choose our partners based on them being a similar level of physical attractiveness to ourselves. Couples who are well-matched in their attractiveness are most likely to be happier and in a stable relationship than those who are mismatched

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is Complex Matching?

(Physical Attractiveness)

A

We may compensate lack of attractiveness with other desirable qualities such as humour, kindness, money, charm. This is a more advanced matching system and would explain why some partnerships are not equal in physical attractiveness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the four Degrees of Social Penetration Theory?

A
  1. Orientation Stage: this is the stage where many “play it safe” and only engage in simple small talk
  2. Exploratory Affective Stage: attitudes and feelings begin to be expressed on moderate topics such as religion and politics
  3. Affective Stage: private and personal matters begin to be shared and criticisms are arguments sometimes arise
  4. Stable Stage: individuals are able to predict how another will act and personal things continue to be shared
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is Self-disclosure?

(Social Penetration Theory)

A

Voluntary disclosure of intimate/personal detail about oneself to others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the two aspects of Self-disclosure?

(Social Penetration Theory)

A
  1. Receivers perspective: people are more attracted to people who disclose personal details to them
  2. Givers perspective: people are more likely to disclose information to people they like
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is Breadth?

(Social Penetration Theory)

A

Altman and Taylor, 1973:

Is the quantity of information that is disclosed to another individual. Categories can range from sports, religion and politics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is Depth?

(Social Penetration Theory)

A

Altman and Taylor, 1973:

Is the frequency of breadth or level of interest within a category - however if frequency is not met, a relationship can be maintained with duration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is Reciprocity?

(Social Penetration Theory)

A

Reis and Shaver:

We must feel like the sharing is mutual to feel increasing levels of intimacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Evaluation of Social Penetration Theory

A

Strengths:
- Laurenceau, 2005: found a correlation between self-disclosure/reciprocity and satisfaction/intimacy. This was found through using daily diary entries of married heterosexual couples
- Hass & Stafford, 1998: found that 57% of gay men and women reported that open honest communication as the main way that maintains and deepens a relationship. Self-disclosure and reciprocity can be used consciously to help those seeking to improve their relationship

Limitation:
- Social Media:
1. Boom or Bust, self-disclosure is increased due to anonymity and does so quickly
2. Knop et al, 2016, people disclose more face-to-face due to clues, eye contact, silence in conversation, etc

19
Q

What is Filter Theory?

A

An idea to explain how some romantic relationships form and develop. We have a field of availables and potential romantic partners - but not everyone is desirable. So we filter those who we think are desirable

20
Q

What is Kerckhoff and Davis’ study?

(Filter Theory)

A

A longitudinal study that looked at 94 dating couples at Duke University, USA. They used 2 questionnaires within their study and did a follow up 7 months later:

  1. Index of value consensus Test - attitudes and beliefs
  2. FIRO-B - complementary of need

Initially the only similarity correlated with closeness. The first 18 months couples attitudes and values correlated with closeness, but after 18 months complementarity of need was a better indicator of closeness

21
Q

What are the 3 stages of Filter Theory and what are their attributes?

A

Social Demography: age, culture, locality, religion

Similarity in attitudes: values, beliefs, attitudes

Complementarity: how well we meet the needs of our partner and vice versa

22
Q

Evaluation of Filter Theory

A

Limitations:
- Lacks temporal validity as the ideas are based on thoughts/views of the 1950s and are then conducted in the 60s, meaning not many attributes are relevant in modern time
- The stages based on time is very limited as relationships are fluid and don’t conform to a time frame
- It poses the question as to are we naturally similar or do we match over time?

23
Q

What is Social Exchange Theory?

A

The idea that social behaviour is a result of an exchange process. The result is to maximise the benefits and minimise the costs

24
Q

What is the Comparison Level (CL)?

(Social Exchange Theory)

A

Using previous experience we identify how much reward we think we deserve in a relationship, this is our CL and we judge relationships against it to determine whether to pursue it or not

25
Q

What is the Comparison Level of alternatives (CLat)?

(Social Exchange Theory)

A

A second comparison where we consider if there is a better alternative available. We will stay in a relationship when we feel there is no better option

26
Q

What are the four stages identified by Thibault and Kelley?

(Social Exchange Theory)

A
  1. Sampling Stage: we explore the rewards and costs of social exchange by experimenting with them in our own relationships (not just romantic ones), or by observing others doing so
  2. Bargaining Stage: makes the beginning of the relationship, when romantic partners start exchanging various rewards and costs, negotiating and identifying what is most profitable

3.Commitment Stage: as time goes on, the sources of cost and reward becomes more stable as rewards increase and costs lessen

  1. Institutionalisation Stage: the partners are now settled down because the norm of the relationship, in terms of rewards and costs, are firmly established
27
Q

How can you apply Social Exchange Theory to real-life?

A

Integrated Behavioural Couples Therapy: IBCT - was used to treat 60 couples in Christensen’s study, 2/3 of the couples relationships were improved 2 years later

28
Q

What is Miller’s study?

(Social Exchange Theory)

A

Found people who rated themselves as being in a committed relationship spent less time looking at imagines of alternative people. And also found that less time looking was a good predictor of the relationship continuing 2 months later

29
Q

What did Walster et al suggest?

(Equity Theory)

A

That the most successful relationships are those where levels of giving and receiving are balanced

  1. You get what you put in = satisfaction
  2. Both partners contribute equal benefits and accept equal costs
30
Q

What is Stafford and Canary’s key study?

(Equity Theory)

A

They asked over 200 married couples to complete measures of equity and relationship satisfaction. Each spouse was asked about their use of relationship maintenance strategies such as:

  1. Assurance (emphasising affection/commitment)
  2. Sharing Tasks (household responsibilities/chores)
  3. Positivity (communicating in an optimistic/upbeat manner)

They found that satisfaction was highest for spouses who perceived their relationship to be equitable

31
Q

How to deal with inequity - Hatfield and Rapson?

(Equity Theory)

A
  1. Restoration of actual equity: restoring by voluntary setting things right or by urging their partners to do so
  2. Restoration of psychological equity: inequitable couples can distort reality and convince themselves that things are perfectly fine how they are
  3. Leave: this can be physically (divorce) or emotionally (no longer having feelinh for their partner)
32
Q

What is the gender difference in the importance of equity - DeMaris et al?

(Equity Theory)

A

Women tend to perceive themselves as more under-benefitted compared to men. Suggesting the main reason for this is that women’s greater relationship focus may make them more sensitive to injustice and inequity. A consequence of this is that women are more likely to be vigilant about equity and more likely to react negatively to injustices and inequity

33
Q

What is the Capuchin Monkey study - Brosnon and de Waal?

(Equity Theory)

A

They did a study on Capuchin monkeys, found that females became angry if they were denied a hight prized reward of grapes i return for playing a game. If a monkey (who played no part in the game) received a grape, the other monkey grew angry and hurled food at the experimenter

Found that these studied echoing what researchers have found in human relationships and suggests that the perception of inequity has ancient origins - supporting equity theory

34
Q

What are the three types of individual in regards to population validity - Huseman?

(Equity Theory)

A
  1. Benevolents - givers/tolerant of under-reward
  2. Equity Sensitives - people more sensitive to equity/inequity
  3. Entitles - always feel they are owed and need over-reward to feel happy
35
Q

What is the equation proposed by Rusbult?

(Investment Model)

A

Satisfaction + Alternatives + Investments = Commitment Levels = Future stay/leave decisions

36
Q

What are the two types of investment?

(Investment Model)

A
  1. Extrinsic - didn’t feature in but are now closely tied to the relationship
  2. Intrinsic - anything put directly into the relationship
37
Q

What is the real-world application in terms of explaining abusive relationships?

(Investment Model)

A

The model is able to explain why individuals may persist in a relationship with an abusive partner. Victims of partner abuse experience low satisfaction, which would lead us to believe they would leave the partner, yet many stay. The model highlights features of the relationship that explains why a victim might stay: may be due to lack of availables, or too much investment within the partner

38
Q

What did Goodfriend and Agnew state?

(Investment Model)

A

Suggested that it is not only current investments that are important but also planned future investments

39
Q

What is the meta-analysis by Le et al?

(Investment Model)

A

Analysed data from nearly 38,000 participants, in 137 different studies, over the course of a 33-year period ti discover the key variables that predict ‘staying or leaving’ behaviour in non-marital relationships. Commitment (or lack) was a particularly strong predictor of whether a relationship would break up. Other aspects (satisfaction, quality of alternatives and the investment) were modest predictors of the likelihood of staying in a relationship or breaking up

40
Q

What does Duck’s model state?

(Relationship Breakdown)

A

That there must first be dissatisfaction in the relationship

41
Q

What are the three broad categories identified by Duck?

(Relationship Breakdown)

A
  1. Mechanical Failure: two suitable people of goodwill and good nature grow apart and find they cannot live together (most common cause)
  2. Pre-existing Doom: incompatibility and failure are almost predestined
  3. Sudden Death: the discovery of betrayal/infidelity leads to immediate termination
42
Q

What are the four stages of relationship breakdown proposed by Duck?

(Relationship Breakdown)

A
  1. The Intrapsychic phase: during the phase, a person may begin to reflect on the shortcomings of their current relationship. May show little outward dissatisfaction, indirect communication about their feelings
  2. The Dyadic phase: after a partner has decided the problems need to be addressed, it is time to confront the other partner. This phase is often characterised by arguing but it is still possible for the relationship to be repaired
  3. The Social phase: dissatisfaction is now openly made known and is shared with friends and family. Sharing with the social network may speed up the breakdown as people take sides. They offer support after the relationship end (Noack et al, 1986)
  4. The Grave-dressing phase: the relationship is now ended. Partners justify their decisions. They present themselves as maintaining trust and loyalty. Represents the relationship ending in favourable terms regarding their part in the failure
43
Q

Evaluation of Duck

(Relationship Breakdown)

A

Strength:
- Backed up by equity theory (Hatfield) meaning it has external validity

Limitations:
- Very reductionist/simplistic as it focuses on individual aspects
- It assumes/generalises behaviour into ALL social relationships when not all are similar
- It’s retrospective, focuses on the event after it happened, links to Eye Witness Testimony and Post Event Discussion and retrieval failure

Psychology (11 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions