Relationships Flashcards
Theory of sexual selection
Intrasexual
This theory explains the evolution of characteristics that confer a reproductive advantage as opposed to a survival advantage.
In intrasexual selection individuals of one sex must outcompete other members of their sex in order to gain access to members of the other sex
Meaning able to pass on the genes
Whatever characteristics lead to success become more widespread
Intersexual selection
Sexual selection and long term mate preferences
In intersexual selection members of one sex evolve preferences for desirable qualities in potential mates. The preferences of one sex therefore determine the area in which the other sets must compete.
People are choosy as the genetic quality of their mate will determine half of there offspring’s. For females this means being attracted to males who are able to invest resources in her and her children and is physically able to protect her and her children
Evaluation
Bernstein points out that gender differences in mate preference’s pattern might stem from cultural traditions rather than Being the result of evolved characteristics.
For example the fact that women have. been denied economic and political power in Many cultures might account for their tendency to rely on the security and economic resources provided by men .
We shouldn’t underestimate the role of social and economic factors in establishing mate preferences
Evaluation
Claims that evolutionary psychologists are mistaken in their claims of a universal female preference for high status as mates
He argues that the majority of studies to determine female mate preferences have been carried out on female undergraduates student. These women expect to achieve high educational status and so have expectation of high income levels. The fact that these women prefer high status men might be explained by a general preference for high status men or it may be better explained in terms of a preference for men with similar interests, education and prospects to their own.
The matching hypothesis
The matching hypothesis claims that, when initiating romantic relationships, individuals seek out partners whose social desirability approximately equals their own.
According to this view, when choosing a partner individuals must first assess their own value in the eyes of a potential romantic partner and then select the best available candidates who would be most likely to be attracted to them.
Matching and physical attractiveness
Although the matching hypothesis initially proposed that people would pair up with someone as social desirable as themselves in terms of a wide range of assets over time it has to be associated specifically with matching in physical attractiveness alone
Evaluation
People come to a relationship offering many desirable characteristics, of which physical attractiveness is only one.
A person may compensate for a lack of physical attractiveness with other desirable qualities such as a charming personality, kindness, status money and so o. Sprecher and Hatfield refer to this tendency to compensate for a lack of physical attractiveness by offering other desirable traits
Evaluation
Matching may not be that important in initial attraction
In a study of online dating patterns, they found no evidence that dates decisions were driven by a similarity between their own and potential partners physical attractiveness. Instead they found evidence of an overall preference for attractive partners.
Self disclosure
Research on self disclosure
It refers to the extent to which a person reveal personal information about thermal- their intimate thought feelings and experiences to another person.
Research show that the level of self disclosure received in romantic relationships was a better predictor of liking and loving than the level of self disclosure that is given. Research also found that self disclosure was positively related to relationship stability.
Different types of self disclosure
Norms of self disclosure
For example disclosing one’s taste in music and disclosing one’s inner fears and fantasies are quite different. It is not self disclosure that predicts satisfaction but the type of self disclosure.
There are norm about self disclosure for example there is the norm that people should engage in only a moderately personal level of self disclosure in the early stages of a relationship.
Evaluation
They found research support for the importance of self disclosure.
They found that people who engage in intimate disclosure tend to be liked more than people who disclose at lower levels, and people like other as a result of having disclosed to them. The relationship between disclosure and liking was stronger if the recipient believed that the disclosure was shared only with them rather than being shared indiscriminately with others.
Evaluation
Some research have suggested that relationships formed over the internet involve higher levels of self-disclosure and attraction than in face to face relationship.
Because individuals communicating over the internet are often anonymous, this may lead them to reveal more information about themselves. Cooper and sportolari refer to this as the boom and bust phenomenon. When people reveal more about themselves earlier than they would in a face to face interaction relationship get very intense very quickly( boom). However because the underlying trust and true knowledge of the other person are not there to support the relationship, it becomes difficult to sustain(bust)
Filter theory
Social demography
We choose romantic partners by using a series of filters that narrow down the field of availables from which we might eventually make our choice.
Refers to variables such as as age social background and geographical location, which determine the likelihood of individuals meeting in the first place.
Similarity in attitude
Complementary of needs
Kerchoff and Davis that similarity in attitudes and values was of central importance at the start of a relationship and was the best predictor of the relationship being stable.
People who have different needs like each other because they provide each other with mutual satisfaction of these opposed needs. This is important because finding a partner who complements them ensures that their own needs are likely to be met
Evaluation
Duck suggest that the filtering process is important because it allows people to make predictions about their future interaction and so avoid investing in a relationship that won’t work
Each person conduct a series of explorations, disclosing bits of information about themselves and making enquiries about the other person . Based on these exchanges partners may decide to continue with a relationship or make a decision that it will not work and so end the relationship before becoming too deeply involved with the other person.