Relationships Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Social exchange theory

A

one of the so-called ‘economic’ theories of relationships. Economic theories describe relationships as a series of exchanges aiming at balancing rewards and costs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How do Thibault and Kelly describe romantic relationships?

A

using the economic terminology of profit and loss. They claim that partners in relationships strive to maximise rewards (companionship, emotional support) and minimise costs (stress, arguments). Notions of rewards and costs are subjective and costs also tend to change over time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How do people assed how profitable their relationship is?

A

Using levels of comparison

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the first level of comparison?

A

Comparison Level

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Comparison Level (

A

based on person’s idea of how much reward they deserve to receive in relationships. This understanding is subjective and depends on previous romantic experiences and cultural norms of what is appropriate to expect from relationships.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Where are norms of the comparison level reinforced?

A

by books, films and TV programmes and are closely linked to a persons self esteem - if they have high self esteem they will have higher expectations of rewards and vice versa.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the second comparison level called?

A

Comparison Level for alternatives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Comparison Level for alternative

A

concerns a person’s perception of whether other potential relationships or staying alone would be more rewarding than being in their current relationship.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

According to the social exchange theory, why will people stick to their current relationship?

A

as long as they find them more profitable than the alternatives. Furthermore, if people consider themselves to be content in their current relationships, they may not even notice that there are available alternatives.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the series of stages Thibault and Kelly say all relationships go through?

A

Sampling stage
Bargaining stage
Commitment stage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Sampling stage

A

where people explore potential rewards and costs of relationships, not just romantic ones, either by direct experience or by observing others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Bargaining stage

A

which is the first stage of any romantic relationship. At this stage, partners exchange rewards and costs, figure out the most profitable exchanges and negotiate the dynamics of the relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Commitment stage

A

when relationships become more stable, and partners become familiar with sources of rewards and costs, and each other’s expectations, so rewards increase and costs lessen.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is an evaluation of the social exchange theory?

A

Research support for Social Exchange Theory is lacks mundane realism. Emerson and cook done lab experiment where each pp bargained with partner to maximise personal score
But real life based on trust and getting ti know so lacks internal validity and is less applicable .

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is a strength of the social exchange theory?

A

Many useful applications. Integrated behavioural couples therapy - trained to maximise and minisme costs in everyday actions, Christiansen et al said 2/3 of couples treated with this reported having improved and happier. Shows set can be used to help couples.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the equity theory?

A

Another economic theory that was developed in reponse to the criticisms of SET, SET fails to take into account the need most people have for equity in relationships.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What does the equity theory suggest?

A

That partners are concerned about fairness in relatiosnhos.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is the difference between equity and equality?

A

equality, rewards and costs for both partners needs to be the same.
Equity - a percieved fairness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

How is fairness achieved?

A

When people feel they get approximately what they deserve from relationships.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What happens when there is a lack of equity?

A

one partner over benefits and the other partner under benefits from the relationship which leads to dissatisfaction and unhappiness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What does satisfaction come from?

A

Perceived fairness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

When do problems arise accordinf to the equity theory?

A

when one partner puts a lot in to a relationship but gets little back in return. A partner who is the subject of inequity will become distressed and
dissatisfied.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Dealing with inequity

A

work to make the relationship more equitable- if they believe this to be possible. OR- may change the way they think to make the relationship feel more equitable to them.

24
Q

What did Stafford and Canary do their study on?

A

200 married couples who completed questionnaires on relationship equity and satisfaction and were asked about the ways they maintained their relationships.

25
Q

What did Stafford and Canary find?

A

Partners who percieved their relationships as fair and balanved and those who over benefitted experinced the most satisfaction.

26
Q

What is a problem with Stafford and Canarys research?

A

It was conducted using self report studies. This means there is a chnace of it providing invalid answers which is due to social desirability bias. As they may not want to answer truthfully due to them thinking it is not socially acceptable. Which therefore reduces the reliability of the research as a supporting study.

27
Q

Research to support equity theory

A

Staffird and cannary study. This is important as this research provides support for equity theory that suggests that fairness and equality between profit and costs between the partners will lead to the most successful relationships.

28
Q

Gender bias eval

A

Researchers such as Sprecher (1992) found that women tend to be more disturbed when under-benefitting from relationships, and feel more guilt when over- benefitting, while DeMaris et al. (1998) suggest that women are more focused on relationships, and so are more sensitive to injustices. These results indicate clear gender differences between males and females and highlight the importance of conducting research into males and females separately, to avoid gender bias. However, this may then result in an alpha bias and exaggerate differences between males and females that do not actually exist.

29
Q

What did Rusbult et al argue?

A

That SET was lacking a key factor;commitment

30
Q

What did rusbult believe?

A

The Cl and CLalt were not enough to explain commitment

31
Q

What does rusbults model emphasise?

A

Investment. It considers what we would lose if we ended a relationship

32
Q

Investment

A

The anount and the importance if the resources associated eith a relarionship.

33
Q

What are the two types of investment?

A

Intrinsic

Extrinsic

34
Q

Intrinsic investments

A

These are resources that we put directly into a relationship - tangible such as money or intangible such as energy.

35
Q

Extrinsix investments

A

These are things that we accrue that originally were not a feature of a relationship but have become over time. Tangible things can be joint possesions or intangible such as memories or experiences

36
Q

Culture bias is not an issue

A

Le and Agnew’s (2003) meta-analysis of 52 studies found support for the Investment Model across individualist and collectivist cultures, such as in the USA and in Taiwan . Furthermore, the Investment Model, as an explanation of relationship maintenance, is also shown to be valid for different sub-groups, such as friendships; homosexual relationships; and cohabiting couples, etc. This suggests the universality of the Investment Model, making it applicable to wide range of relationships.

37
Q

Explanation for why people stay in abusive relationships

A

According to the model, if a partner feels that the investment they made into relationships will be lost if they leave, they are more likely to stay in a relationship even when the costs are high and rewards are few. For example, Rusbult and Maltz, in their study of ‘battered’ women, found that women were more likely to return to an abusive partner if they felt they had invested in the relationship and they didn’t have any appealing alternatives. This shows that the Investment Model can be applied to a wide range or relationships experiences that the SET and Equity Theory fail to explain, thus increasing the Investment Model’s application to everyday relationships.

38
Q

What are the 3 factors to maintaining a relationship according to rusbult?

A

Satisfaction level, comparison with alternatives and investment.

39
Q

Satisfaction level and comparison with alternatives.

A

Based on idea of comparison levels from SET more satisfaction with rewards increasing and costs decreasing

40
Q

Investment

A

Negotiations resources, tangiable and intangible that can be lost if leave.

41
Q

What did Duck suggest?

A

Relationship dissolution is a process of several stages

42
Q

What are ducks stages?

A

Intra psychic
Dyadic
Social phase
Grave dressing

43
Q

Intra psychic

A

Focuses on internal though process before confronting partner.

44
Q

Dyadic

A

Person confronts partner and voices dissatisfaction.

45
Q

Social phase

A

Involving friends and family on decision. Hard to come back from stage as friends and fam take sides

46
Q

Grave dressing

A

Signifying closure of relationship and looking for new. Minimise own faults and try to prove loyal to new partner.

47
Q

What was latter added to Ducks model in 2006?

A

Fifth stage - personal growth.

Individuals able to learn from the past experiences.

48
Q

Strength of duck

A

Growth phase improved model. Allowed an explanation after grave as to why people better in new relationships. Supported by Toshiro and Frasier who showed when uni students viewed situ as being responsible for end, can move quickly past breakup positively. Strengths claims made by model and = applicable to every day relationships.

49
Q

Weakness of duck

A

Methodology issue, most research examining is based on retrospective data. Using questionnaires and interviews to ask about after break up. Means may not accurate and be coloured by current situation. Important as means ducks model doesn’t describe how break up happens in real life, weakening ability to present accurate pic.

50
Q

What are the two theories in virtual relationships?

A

Reduced cue theory

Absence of gating

51
Q

Reduced cue theiry

A

But Sproull and Kessler - suggested online relationship less effective than face to face bc absence of non verbal communication cues (tone of voice) leads to de individualisation so more likely to include impersonal communication.

52
Q

What did Walter introduce?

A

Hyper personal model - more self disclosure cos more comfortable so more intense quicker.

53
Q

Absence of gating

A

Gate = obstical of formation
Unattractive, shy etc. mckenna and bargh say absence makes it easier to begin and become intimate. Focus is on what they are saying. You are free to create online personas different from real life.

54
Q

Weakness of virtual

A

Research based on experiences of western technologically developed cultures. Internet tech not available in some so conclusions can’t be applied . Nakanisihi - in contrast to American cultures, women in Japan preferred Lowe levels of self disclosure. Suggesting level of self dis depends on cultures norms. This decreases validity of research and limits range it can explanations.

55
Q

Weakness of virtual - Most research conducted in 1990s/2000s

A

E.g. Walther 1996. The nature of virtual relationships changing rapidly with technology so the research risks becoming outdated when published. important as it highlights most has temporal validity and so undermines credibility of most of them