Relations Between Federal and State Governments Flashcards
What’s going on here?
Both the federal and state governments are acting
Supremacy Clause
State Law + Federal Law + Conflict… = Federal Law wins.
Supremacy Clause
State Law + Federal Law + Conflict… = Federal Law wins.
10th Amendment
Can a state law be TOUGHER? YES. Why? Police Power.
Can a state law be LIGHTER? NO.
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS FEDERAL POLICE POWER
Congress cannot pass a law “for the general welfare”
State yellow does XY and Z. No federal law at issue. Can they do it?
Yeah. 10th Amendment, state police power, any law for health safety wellfare.
Commandeer Rule
Fed Gov’t can’t command state to do anything
Federal Law says this. State law says that. The laws conflict. Who wins?
- Federal Law (Supremacy Clause)
Federal Law says this. State law says that. The laws do not conflict. Can State pass?
- Yes. 10th Amendment Police Power. Health, safety, welfare.
State law exists. Federal law does not exist on this issue. Can state pass?
- Yes. Police power, pass laws for health, safety wellfare, etc. Just can’t violate the Constitution
State law exists. Federal law does not exist on this issue. Can state pass?
- Yes. Police power, pass laws for health, safety wellfare, etc. Just can’t violate the Constitution
Congress passes a law obligating/commanding state do to something. Constitutional?
- No. (Commandeering)
Congress asks/ incentivizes the state do to something. Constitutional?
- Yes. Not commandeering.
Congress passes some law regulating businesses/widgets. Constitutional?
- Yes. Commerce Clause.
State passing law regulating business. State law discriminates against OUT OF STATE INTERESTS. Constitutional?
- No. Dormant commerce clause. Strict scrutiny. Pick the commerce clause answer even if it doesn’t say “dormant”.
- CAN if the state itself is acting as a market participant. State is acting in-house.
State passing law regulating business. State law incidentally/accidentally discriminates against OUT OF STATE INTERESTS. Constitutional?
- Intermediate level test. Must serve an IMPORTANT governmental interest and the burden on commerce shouldn’t be EXCESSIVE.
State 1 renders a judgment on the merits. Now State 2 has the judgment brought up to them. What happens?
- State 2 has to give judgment FULL FAITH AND CREDIT.
State tries to sue federal government. Constitutional?
State tries to tax federal government. Constitutional?
- No. Fed gov’t has immunity from state suits.
State tries to tax individuals working for fed govt. Constitutional?
- Yes. No immunity here.
Individual cannot sue fed gov’t unless
- State consents.
Fed Gov’t tries to sue a state. Constitutional?
- Yes. No immunity.
Fed Gov’t tries to sue a state. Constitutional?
- No if tax is applied to a gov’t activity/function (while they’re doing their job).
- Yes, if it is applied to a proprietary business (guy who runs a business on state property). — John runs a gift shop in state courthouse.
- Cant tax the state courthouse. Can tax the courthouse gift shop.