Regulatory Class - Oct 31 Flashcards
Office of Orphan Products Development (OOPD)
Promote development of products that demonstrate promise for diagnosis/treatment of rare diseases and conditions
Serves in an advisory role to FDA review divisions on issues related to orphan products
1/3 of all approvals are now orphan drugs
Orphan Drug Designation
Can be a previously unapproved drug or a new orphan indication for an approved indication
Must submit request for designation prior to submitting a marketing application
Must treat a rare disease that affects fewer than 200,000 in the US. Or it can affect more if there is no reasonable expectation that costs of development would be recovered from future sale in the US (NIH has database and papers for disease prevalence)
Manufacturer must notify FDA at least 1 year prior to discontinuing production of the drug (so they could find another manufacturer - market exclusivity would follow the drug)
Orphan Drug Financial Incentives
Exemption from Prescription Drug User Fees
Tax credit
Federal grants for clinical testing
7 years of market exclusivity from date of approval (extended for an additional 6 months for pediatric indications)
Orphan Drug Financial Incentives - Tax Credit
50% of the cost of conducting human clinical trials against Federal taxes owed
Only applicable for testing between designation date and marketing approval
Must be a trial performed in the US under an IND, unless there aren’t enough people in the US to do a trial
The earlier the designation, the more money they’ll get with the credit
Orphan Drug Financial Incentives - Orphan Drugs Grants Program
Phase 1 studies eligible for up to $200,000 per year for up to 3 years
Phase 2 and 3 studies are eligible for up to $400,000 per year for up to 4 years
Studies must be conducted under IND
Orphan Drug Financial Incentives - Market Exclusivity
7 years of market exclusivity – no approval given to a subsequent sponsor of the same product for the same indication
Different from a patent that covers the active ingredient and all its uses
Can be withdrawn if manufacturer can’t supply sufficient quantities, the manufacturer waives it, or another sponsor demonstrates clinical superiority
Criteria for Clinical Superiority
Greater effectiveness (effect on clinically meaningful endpoint, usually a direct comparative clinical study is necessary)
Improved safety (eliminate an ingredient that causes adverse events)
In the absence of greater effectiveness or safety, the new drug makes a major contribution to patient care (ex. going from 4x a day injections to 1x a month)
Orphan Drug Regulatory Incentives
Sponsor may request written FDA recommendations for nonclinical and clinical investigations
Must have specific questions for the FDA; can be for any stage of development; must provide sufficient info to assess questions
FDA may request more info and the sponsor has 90 days to respond
Orphan Drug Designation Request Contents
Sponsor, manufacturer and drug information
Description of rare disease or condition
Proposed indications
Reasons why therapy is needed
Manufacturer info
Scientific rationale (demonstrate potential for this therapeutic)
Data from nonclinical and clinical studies; copies of pertinent publications
Regulatory status and marketing history
Documentation supporting rare disease or no reasonable expectation of cost recovery
Orphan Drug Designation Request - If claiming no reasonable expectation of cost recovery, must submit:
All costs incurred or expected to be incurred in course of developing the drug for the U.S.
If developed outside U.S., data and justification regarding costs incurred outside U.S.
Production and marketing costs up through first 7 years
Estimate of U.S. sales revenues for first 7 years (when FDA thinks they’ll make the most money)
Must include CPA report
Orphan Drug Designation Request - Designation of orphan subset of common disease
Must be medically plausible group
Plausible bases: toxicologic profile, pharmacologic property, mechanism of action, etc.
Why FDA would refuse to grant Orphan Drug Designation?
Drug is not intended to treat a rare disease or
condition
Sponsor failed to establish medically plausible basis for expecting drug to be effective
Drug is the same as an approved orphan drug and sponsor has provided insufficient evidence of possible clinical superiority
Contains untrue statement of material fact
Changing Orphan Drug Designation
Sponsor may amend designation if new info was found and the initial designation was made in good faith, and at the time, prevalence and cost thresholds were met
FDA may revoke designation if request contained untrue statement, omitted material, or doesn’t meet criteria (if drug is approved, it loses exclusivity but not approval)
Orphan Drug Progress Reports
Within 14 months after date of designation must submit annual report to OOPD, and every year until submission of marketing approval
Includes:
Drug development progress
Review of preclinical and clinical studies
Coming year’s investigational plan
Change that may affect product’s orphan drug status
Definition of Same Drug
Identical active moiety - the part responsible for the action of the drug
If it’s a large molecule - must have the same principal structural features
The same drug will be considered different if it is clinically superior.
Special Protocol Assessment
FDA will review certain protocols to assess whether they are adequate to meet scientific and regulatory requirements
FDA feedback is binding and they respond within 45 days of receipt
FDA will respond only to the specific questions and may request more info; sponsor could request type A meeting after SPA
FDA could setup an Advisory Committee, not open to the public, respond to SPA within 45 days of meeting
Can change agreement if both the FDA and sponsor agree or if the FDA find an essential and substantial scientific issue
Special Protocol Assessment: Types of Protocols
Animal carcinogenicity protocols
Final product stability protocols
Phase 3 trial protocols
Phase 3 - FDA to meet with sponsors to reach agreement on design and size of clinical trials intended to form basis of efficacy claim (discuss at end of Phase 2 meeting)
Requesting SPAs
Separate request submitted for each protocol
Each request is an IND amendment
Submit to FDA at least 90 days prior to anticipated study start date (cannot submit one after the start date)
Carcinogenicity studies should be discussed at end of phase 2 meetings and a letter of intent should be sent to director 30 days before SPA request
Stability protocols are only reviewed if different from the standard