Recovery from stroke and spinal cord injury Flashcards
Outline the corticospinal tract
Also known as the pyramidal tract: largely originates from M1 and is responsible for voluntary movement.
Axons from the cortex travel to the brainstem where 90% of them decussate.
When reach spinal cord level contact neurons in the ventral horn (interneurons and motor neurons)
Neurons in ventral horn go on to connect to muscles.
In SCI this is damaged, in stroke m1 is damaged.
What is recovery of function after stroke thought to be down to?
Plasticity…there are 2 different ways this could happen. Not well understood.
1)Cortical reorganisation and 10% of the ipsilateral side.
2) Due to contralateral side of the body.
What are the 2 different phases of recovery and how do they differ?
1) Acute: up to 12 weeks (or 6 months) after injury with 4 weeks the greatest abililty to recover function.
* There are neurotrophins that enhance plasticity and survival of neurons in this phase.
2) Chronic: In general where patients reach plateau in recovery of function. Occurs at around 6 months after injury.
How does recovery of function compare to normal motor function?
Full motor function not regained. In particular fractionation of fingers etc.
What is the ARAT?
Action Research Arm Test
Motor test: : Assesses a patient’s ability to handle objects differing in size, weight and shape and therefore can be considered to be an arm-specific measure of activity limitation.
Outline Fugl Meyer Assessment
initial severity of upper limb Paresis is the best predictor of good functional outcome.
STROKE SPECIFIC: motor function, sensation, pain
*higher score = better function
The FMA at 30 days explained 86% of the variance at six months
You can actually predict what would be the recovery at 6 months based on the first 30 days
Because nothing happened after 30 days
Outline the proportional recovery rule
Biological recovery (Δ FMA): change in impairments in the FMA from the first three days post stroke to 3 months later
ΔFMA-UEpredicted = 0.7·(66 − FMA-UEinitial) + 0.4
What does this imply?: recovery is spontaneous and current interventions do nothing.
Compensatory strategies
As recovery for stroke patients is not complete compensatory strategies have been developed and even some physical therapy teaches this.
Somewhat controversial as tells patients that they can never recover function. On the other hand, chronic patients need to perform tasks so functional more important than performing movemments the ‘correct’.
1980’s when switch occurred, before that daily living was not taken into account and more focus on normal muscle tone and correct reflexes.
Outline motor learning.
motor learning is the core idea that drives current task based approaches to neural rehabilitation as well as robotic and constraint based therapies in chronic stroke.
Statement: recovery after stroke is a form of learning or relearning.
The relearning rests on three assumptions
That the target to be rehabilitated has been properly identified
That a framework exists for choosing the proper learning mechanism
That learning mechanisms are intact in patients with stroke
NB: assumptions are likely to be untrue which makes statement untrue.
Outline Instruction and imitation.
Form of motor learning.
1st there was a big emphasis on the adaptation tasks
However it is obvious that motor skills like cooking driving cannot be acquired without instruction or knowledge
Subjects cannot learn motor tasks with even minimal redundant structure without explicit instruction
Motor learning is not synonymous with low level automatic implicit processes.
Outline reinforcement learning
Actions will be selected with increased or decreased frequency depending on the schedule of rewards and punishments, respectively.
The balance between present and future rewards is of central importance to reinforcement learning.
Constraint induced movement therapy(CIMT) is based on ideas from reinforcement learning. The good arm is constrained in an attempt to prevent adoption of the bad habits.
Reinforcement learning is also used as an attempt to train out of synergy movements in patients for example to decouple muscles involved in the flexor synergy after stroke.
Outline sensorimotor adaptation.
Adaptation refers to reduction of errors in response to a perturbation.
This is a form of supervised learning with the goal of minimising the error between prediction and observations.
The relevance of sensorimotor adaptation to rehabilitation protocols remains unclear: changes in behaviour do not seem to last once the perturbation is removed.
For example in an experiment using a split belt treadmill to reduce step asymmetry in hemiparetic gaits the desirable after effects are very short lived.
NB: glasses experiment.
Outline use dependent plasticity.
Neural changes induced via repetition of movements.
Behavioural consequences referred to as use dependent learning.
Link between learning and plasticity
Learning implies plastic change.
Plastic change does not imply learning.
UDP and voluntary movement.
In this experiment transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex was used to evoke isolated and directionally consistent thumb movements.
Subjects were then required to practise thumb movements for 30 minutes in the direction approximately opposite to the elicited by TMS .
The critical finding was that subsequent TMS was found to evoke movements in the direction practised rather than in the pre training baseline direction .
This is very interesting with regard of how movement repetition can lead to changes in cortical representation.