Reconstructive Memory Model Flashcards
AO1: What are schemas?
Idea that our memory is grouped into categories based on our experiences within family, culture, wider experiences.
AO1: What is assimilation?
Change our schemas to fit new information
AO1: What is accommodation?
Change memories to keep schemas intact and unchanged
AO1: What is levelling?
Downplaying details from memories
AO1: What is sharpening?
Adding/ exaggerating details from a memory
AO1: How can memory use schemas to organise things? (3)
- Schemas tell us what happened when we recall a memory
- Fill gaps in our memories
- May put pressure on mind to remember things in a way that fits w. schemas
AO1: What is confabulation?
When schemas fill in gaps in our memories.
AO1: What is rationalisation?
Fill in gaps of a scenario which leads to confabulation
AO3: Bartlett 1932 (War of the Ghosts) - PROCEDURE (2)
Showed 20 students a Native American ghost story
Asked them to read it then recall it several occasions after hours, data, weeks, years
AO3: Bartlett 1932 (War of the Ghosts) - RESULTS (3)
Pps shortened story from 330 words - 180 words w. shortest reproduction after longest gap (2 yrs)
Confabulated details: changed unfamiliar details e.g. canoes to boats
Pps rationalised story: e.g. ghost missed out
AO3: Allport & Postman (1947) - PROCEDURE (2)
Showed pps drawing of argument on a subway train
Asked to describe it to another pps
AO3: Allport & Postman (1947) - RESULTS (1)
White pps reversed presentation of black and white characters in picture
AO3: Loftus & Palmer (1974 a) - PROCEDURE
Showed clips of car crashes to students and set them questionnaire to answer
One critical qs: speed of car— smashed/ hit into each other to different groups
AO3: Loftus & Palmer (1974 a) - RESULTS (2)
Smashed- average speed of car 40.8 mph
Hit- average speed of car 34 mph
AO3: Loftus & Palmer (1974 b) - PROCEDURE (1)
Week after part a, asked if there was any broken glass in car wreck
AO3: Loftus & Palmer (1974 b) - RESULTS (3)
Falsely recalled by 12% of control (never asked speed of car)
Falsely recalled by 14% of ‘hit’ group
Falsely recalled by 32% of ‘smashed’ group
AO3: Devlin Report (1976)- WHAT DID IT DO?
Looked at number of criminal cases to draw conclusions on method of visual identification of suspects
AO3: Devlin Report (1976)- PROOF (3)
Bartlett
Allport & Postman
Loftus
AO3: Devlin Report (1976)- CONCLUSION
British juries should never convict someone where only evidence is a single eyewitness
AO3: Steyvers & Hemmer (2012)- PROCEDURE (2)
Part 1: 22 pps asked to list 5 objects found in 5 naturalistic scenes e.g. office, kitchen
Part 2: control of 25 people asked to identify all objects see in 25 images of 5 scenes
AO3: Steyvers & Hemmer (2012)- RESULTS (2)
Incorrect recall of low frequency objects was 18% (least recalled)
Incorrect recall of high frequency objects was 9% (most recalled)