Reconstructive Memory Model Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

AO1: What are schemas?

A

Idea that our memory is grouped into categories based on our experiences within family, culture, wider experiences.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

AO1: What is assimilation?

A

Change our schemas to fit new information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

AO1: What is accommodation?

A

Change memories to keep schemas intact and unchanged

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

AO1: What is levelling?

A

Downplaying details from memories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

AO1: What is sharpening?

A

Adding/ exaggerating details from a memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

AO1: How can memory use schemas to organise things? (3)

A
  1. Schemas tell us what happened when we recall a memory
  2. Fill gaps in our memories
  3. May put pressure on mind to remember things in a way that fits w. schemas
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

AO1: What is confabulation?

A

When schemas fill in gaps in our memories.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

AO1: What is rationalisation?

A

Fill in gaps of a scenario which leads to confabulation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

AO3: Bartlett 1932 (War of the Ghosts) - PROCEDURE (2)

A

Showed 20 students a Native American ghost story
Asked them to read it then recall it several occasions after hours, data, weeks, years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

AO3: Bartlett 1932 (War of the Ghosts) - RESULTS (3)

A

Pps shortened story from 330 words - 180 words w. shortest reproduction after longest gap (2 yrs)
Confabulated details: changed unfamiliar details e.g. canoes to boats
Pps rationalised story: e.g. ghost missed out

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

AO3: Allport & Postman (1947) - PROCEDURE (2)

A

Showed pps drawing of argument on a subway train
Asked to describe it to another pps

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

AO3: Allport & Postman (1947) - RESULTS (1)

A

White pps reversed presentation of black and white characters in picture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

AO3: Loftus & Palmer (1974 a) - PROCEDURE

A

Showed clips of car crashes to students and set them questionnaire to answer
One critical qs: speed of car— smashed/ hit into each other to different groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

AO3: Loftus & Palmer (1974 a) - RESULTS (2)

A

Smashed- average speed of car 40.8 mph
Hit- average speed of car 34 mph

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

AO3: Loftus & Palmer (1974 b) - PROCEDURE (1)

A

Week after part a, asked if there was any broken glass in car wreck

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

AO3: Loftus & Palmer (1974 b) - RESULTS (3)

A

Falsely recalled by 12% of control (never asked speed of car)
Falsely recalled by 14% of ‘hit’ group
Falsely recalled by 32% of ‘smashed’ group

17
Q

AO3: Devlin Report (1976)- WHAT DID IT DO?

A

Looked at number of criminal cases to draw conclusions on method of visual identification of suspects

18
Q

AO3: Devlin Report (1976)- PROOF (3)

A

Bartlett
Allport & Postman
Loftus

19
Q

AO3: Devlin Report (1976)- CONCLUSION

A

British juries should never convict someone where only evidence is a single eyewitness

20
Q

AO3: Steyvers & Hemmer (2012)- PROCEDURE (2)

A

Part 1: 22 pps asked to list 5 objects found in 5 naturalistic scenes e.g. office, kitchen
Part 2: control of 25 people asked to identify all objects see in 25 images of 5 scenes

21
Q

AO3: Steyvers & Hemmer (2012)- RESULTS (2)

A

Incorrect recall of low frequency objects was 18% (least recalled)
Incorrect recall of high frequency objects was 9% (most recalled)