Recap Review/Offer/Acceptance Flashcards
Betty was accepted to medical school and registered for classes. Aunt promises Betty $1,000 if Betty goes to the medical store. This constitutes a:
A gift. She was already accepted.
Tommy agrees to sell a chickie dinosaur play set for 2,000, 1,000 in cash and the balance in installments over a two period year. Offer?
Yes. Both parties manifested an intent to conclude a binding agreement, the indefiniteness of the terms is fine.
Lorna tries to text James, “I’ll sell you peacock feathers today if you give me $90.” Lorna’s Wi-Fi is weak, so it hasn’t gone through yet. Is it an offer?
Definite terms have been met but it has not been understood by the offeree. Not an offer.
Text from previous goes through. James texts back “I could possibly buy it for $70.” Is this an offer?
Not an offer. It is unclear what the terms are.
Lorna decides to put a message on her Facebook, “I’m selling peacock feathers for $90!”
No, but there is a manifestation to bargain, clear and definite terms, and intent to bargain. BUT it is not clear who they are selling to.
Explain and apply the rules for accepting an offer AND evaluate whether an offer was accepted when presented with case facts.
We are in the last part of mutual accent (offer and ACCEPTANCE)
James offered to get Rachel a Marta card for $10. Lorna overheard and said, “I accept!” handing him $10. Is this acceptance?
No. It wasn’t to Lorna so it can’t be acceptance.
Nigel offered Rachel Spanish lessons for $90. Rachel said, “I accept. Here’s $50 dollars. Rachel agreed. Is this acceptance?
Yes.
What is acceptance?
It is a manifestation of assent to the terms made by the offeree in a manner invited or required by the offer.
What are the Acceptance elements?
1) Express commitment
2) unconditional
3) on the terms offered.
Common acceptance issues
1) Content (mirror image rule)
2) Model/Manner of Acceptance
3) Notice (as soon as the offeree mails out their acceptance, they have a binding contract)
4) Standard Form Agreements
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line CO. v. Smith
Rule: The offeror must clearly and definitely express an exclusive mode of acceptance. The acceptance can be unreasonable but the mode of acceptance must be explicit.
An acceptance is still effective if the addition only asks for something that would be implied from the offer and is therefore immaterial.
Reasoning: Even a grumbling acceptance is still an acceptance.
The offeror is the master of the offer
True.
Offeror can demand an exclusive mode of acceptance must be clearly stated if not in any reasonable manner.
True. (common law)
Mirror Image Rule
1) Acceptance = mirror image of the offer
2) small, unimportant change = counter offer
3) exception: implied; mere request; dissatisfied.