Realist theories of crime Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

How do Realist theories differ from Labelling theory and Critical criminology?

A

Labelling theorists and critical criminology see crime as social constructed rather than a real fact. Realists see crime as a real problem, especially for its victims.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How do Realist approaches divide along political lines?

A

Right realists are right wing and share a conservative, New right political outlook and support a ZT stance on crime. Left realists are Left wing, who are reformist socialists and favour policies to promote equality. ( Labour , new labour)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is Right realists view on crime ( 4 views)

A

Crime is not a social construction ( statistics are real) There is a rise in crime and we need to address it Crime undermines social cohesion

Crime is a real problem that needs real solutions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is RR practical solution to crime?

A

They are concerned with practical solutions to reduce crime, the best way to do this is through control and punishment, rather than by rehabilitating offenders or tackling causes such as poverty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Why is RR useful straightaway?

A

It gives a solution to crime unlike labelling theory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What factors do RR reject?

A

they reject the idea that structural or economic factors such as poverty are causes of crime. e.g. they point out that the old tend to be poor yet have a very low crime rate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

For RR crime is a product of 3 factors which is what?

A

Biological differences

Inadequate socialization and the under class Rational choice theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Why is Biological differences a product of crime? including sociologists?

A

According to Wilson and Hernstein (1985) crime is caused by a combination of biological and social factors. These differences between individuals make some people innately more likely to commit crime through personality traits like aggressiveness and also low intelligence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is A03 evaluation against biological differences as a product of crime?

A

critics argue that evidence for intelligence being biologically determined is limited. Even if it is it may not explain offending : Lily et al 2002 found that differences in intelligence accounted for only 3 % of the difference in offending.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why is Inadequate socialization and the underclass a product of crime? including sociologists?

A

Murray : crime is rising due to an increase in the underclass who rely on the welfare state, as well as increase in lone parent families and a failing to socialise children properly, making them more likely to offend.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why is the Rational choice theory a cause of crime? including sociologists?

A

Clarke’s (1980) The decision to commit crime is a choice based on a rational calculation of the likely consequences. If the perceived rewards of crime outweight the perceived costs then people will be more likely to offend.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is an A03 evaluation of Rational choice theory?

A

How can criminals be both rational actors freely choosing crime, while their behaviour is determined by biology and socialisation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How do RR believe about the solutions to crime?

A

They thought it is pointless trying to tackle underlying causes of crime ( biological), since these are hard to change, so instead they focus on controlling and punishing offenders rather than rehabilitation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Crime policies should therefore reduce what?

A

It should reduce the rewards and increase the costs of crime to the offender ( increasing deterrent of crime)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the solutions for RR?

A

Zero tolerance policies. Broken window policies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Who argues the Broken windows theory and explain it? a way of stopping crime. ?

A

Wilson & Kelling’s Broken Windows theory says any sign of deterioration such as graffiti must be dealt with immediately in order to prevent crime taking a hold

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is Zero tolerance?

A

They ( Wilson & Kelling’s) advocate a zero tolerance policy towards undesirable behaviour so that law abiding citizens feel safe.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Why is ZT useful?

A

It tackles small, low level crimes harshly to deter of thinking about commiting serious crimes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Where was ZT first employed and what were the results?

A

This was first introduced in New York in 1994 and reduced crime in 1994 ( major city crime reduced by 39% and murder has fallen by 49%). In London, 81% of residents said they felt safer thanks to ZT policies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is a A03 critque of Zero tolerance?

A

Zero tolerance policies allow police to discriminate against ethnic minorities ( labelling theorists would say that the police can label stretoypes leading to certain groups being targeted than others e.g. 29 year old man chocked to death by police man

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is an A03 evaluation against ZT?

A

However, Young argues that its success was a myth because the crime rate had already been falling and police just defined deviance up so they could arrest more people and justify their existence. So ZT was just a product of the police way of coping with a decline already happening.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is another A03 eval of ZT?

A

ZT doesn’t solve anything, it doesn’t solve the issue of reality, leading to displacement of crime to other areas.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What is situational crime prevention ( another solution of solving crime?

A

Dealing with the situation to make it more difficult to commit a crime and discourage crime from taking place. Stems from the idea ppl commit crime due to rational choice such as Target hardening and CCTV.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Why isn’t a situational crime prevention useful?

A

You are displacing crime, not addressing why people actually commit crime.

25
Q

What is an example of Situational crime prevention?

A

Felson (1998) The port Authority bus terminal in NYC was poorly designed and provided opporunties of deviance, e,g, the toliet was a setting for luggage theft and drug dealing.

26
Q

What was the solution of the Felson (1998) case study?

A

The terminial was re designed to cut out crime e.g. the large sinks where homeless people bathed were replaced with hand basins. Although this is again displacing crime.

27
Q

What is an underlying critique of RR?

A

It ignores structural causes of crime such as poverty and it soley focused with street crime, ignoring CC, which is more costly and harmful to the public.

28
Q

How are Left realists similar to Marxists?

A

LR are opposed to the inequality of capitalist structure and see it as the root cause of crime.

29
Q

How are Left Realists different to Marxists?

A

Unlike Marxists, they are reformist not revelutionary socialists, they believe gradual reforms are the only realsitic way to achieve equality. We need realistic solutions of reducing the crime rate now. Not a future revolution can marxists believe.

30
Q

What is LR critque of Marxists, Neo marxists and Labelling theorists?

A

Marxists : concentrate on crimes of the powerful but neglect W/C crime and its effects

Neo - Marxists : romanticise working class criminals( stealing from rich as resistance to capitalism), whereas in reality W/C criminals mostly victimise other W/C people.

Labelling theorists : see W/C criminals as viticm of labelling. LR argue this neglects the real victims ( w/c who suffer at the hands of criminals)

31
Q

For Left realists, to take crime seriously this involves?

A

Recognising that

Its main victims are disadvantaged groups ( W/C ethnic and women. There are more likely to be victimised and police less likely to see crimes against them seriously ( e.g racist attacks)

There has been a real increase in crime, leading to a aetiological crisis ( crisis of explanation)

32
Q

What is the main difference between Right and left realists?

A

Left realists see the cause of crime are down to structural inequalities, rather than the individual.

33
Q

Lea and Young ( 1984) identify 3 causes of crime which are?

A

Relative deprivation

Subculture

Marginalisation

34
Q

What is relative deprivation?

A

This is the idea of how someone feels in comparison to others. This might cause crime because you may won’t to obtain what others have too ( all classes). The media makes us more materialistic and selfish . This might lead to CC.

35
Q

How does the idea of Relative deprivation link to Merton?

A

similar to the notion of anomie: society creates crime by setting cultural goals ( e.g. material wealth) but defines the opportunity to achieve them by legitmate means ( e.g. decent jobs)

36
Q

Why is a Subculture a reason for crime?

A

Blocked opprtunities can lead to subculture formations. Crime is a collective solution for some groups who are marginalised. Some subcultural groups do not lead to crime e.g. some turn to religion).Those who do turn to crime subscribe to mainstream goals through alternative means.

37
Q

How does Subculture leading to crime for LR similar to Cloward and Ohlin?

A

deviant subcultures are a result to the reaction to the failure to achieve mainstream goals.

38
Q

How is Marginalisation a cause of crime?

A

When marginalised you are pushed to outskirts of society, meaning groups may not have clear goals . This can lead to frustration leading to criminal means ( violence)

39
Q

Who is the sociologists who argues Late modenity and crime?

A

Young ( 2002)

40
Q

What does Young state about Late modentiy and crime?

A

Argues that in late modernity ( since the 1970s) the problem of working class crime is worse due to Harsher welfare polices, increased unemployment and also Destablisation of family and community life.

41
Q

What else does Young argue the media promote?

A

The media is now promoting cultural inclusion ( buying into material goals) , whilst economic exclusion means many want the goals but can’t have. All while we have been forced to believe we are living in meritocracy.

42
Q

Due to economic exclusion ( can’t get these material goals) in late modenity, there is now what ?

A

relative deprivation upwards ( resenting rich in society) and relative deprivation down ( resenting w/c dependency culture). This is becuase W/C have a easier life as they get benefits, this is why there is frsutration to W/C leading to violence to them.

43
Q

In late modentity due to diveristy there is less what about right and wrong?

A

There is less consensus on what is right or wrong . The boundaries have become blurred and familiy has become weaker. LM society has now become a high crime society with a low tolerance to crime, with harsher punishments.

44
Q

If we are in a late modern society and faced withthis new risk and criminality, what can we use to overcome it?

A

Relexitvity ( we have free will and commensense knowledge to construct sense of meaning)

45
Q

For left realists there solutions involve two policies which are what?

A

democratic policing and reducing social inequality

46
Q

Who is the sociologists who talk about Democratic policing?

A

Kinsey, lea and Young (1986) argue that the police rely on the public for information, but they are losing public support, so the flow of information dries up and they must reply on miltary policing..

47
Q

What is miltiary policing?

A

such as using random stop and search tactics. Although this leads to alientation in communities.

48
Q

So left realists due to miltary policing leading to less and less public information argue what?

A

More accountable policing : To win public support, the police must become more accountable to local communities by involving them in deciding polices and prorities ( e/g police over police minor drug crime but under police racist attacks and DV)

49
Q

For left realists crime control must also involve what?

A

A mutli agency apporach is needed whereby police work with social workers, educations systems, the community etc to try and reduce crime, not just police alone.

50
Q

How also do LR think reducing inequality can solve crime?

A

For them the main solution to crime is to remove underlying causes : social inequalities, they call for structural changes such as to tackle discrimination, provide decent jobs and housing.

51
Q

How have Left realists approach had influence to New labour government ( 1997-2010?

A

Their views have strong similarities with the New Labour governments with their firmer approach to domestic violence and hate crimes and introduction of ASBOs

52
Q

What is the Square of crime by Young, Lea and matthews?

A

They argue to truly understand crime, one must examine the interplay between both micro and macto factors in what they call square of crime. LR believe their theory can to understand all crime.

53
Q

What are the 4 points of the square of crime to tackle crime?

A

The criminal justice system ( the state decide what is criminial or not, we must understand social forces that influence the police)

Criminal offender ( Why people offend, What motivates them? )

General public ( we must consider the factors that influence public attitudes and response to crime)

Victim of crime ( what makes a victim vulnerable in both macro ( position in society) and micro (relationship with offender)

54
Q

A02 What was the Perry school project and crime prevention?

A

The project provided high quality pree school education to three to 4 year olds, in america who were at risk of failure. There was a control group ( independent variable left alone who didn’t receive this) and a group who received this education, the activites involved were home vists, decision making. To tackle the problem of CD.

55
Q

What was the results of the Perry Pre school project?

A

The group that were tested were les likely to get arrested 5 or more times.

The group tested were more likely to earn $2000 per month

56
Q

What implications does the perry school project have when dealing with the causes of crime?

A

We should looks at the structural causes of crime to solve it.

A03: Problem with first labelling the kids being tested ( Keddie 1972 vitctim blaiming)

This isn’t realistic because it costs government money

57
Q

What are 3 A03 evaluations of Left realism?

A

It accepts the authorities’ definition of crime as being street crime committed by the poor ignoring capitalist crimes such as corporate crime

Not all those who experience relative deprivation commit crime, they over predict the amount of crime

Focuses on Inner city crime making it seem greater problem than it is.

58
Q

What are 2 similarities and 2 differences between RR and Left realists?

A

Both focus on W/C crime

Crime is not a social construct we need realsitic solutions

Differences

Individuals lack control ( RR) vs Structural causes ( LR)

Social order and control ( RR solution to crime) vs Justice and Equality (LR solutions to crime)