Real Property Hypo Notes - WIP Flashcards
At common law, a conveyance of property from O “to O and A as joint tenants with right of survivorship” creates a __________.
Tenancy in common.
This creates a tenancy in common because 1) it is not a tenancy by the entirety, which is limited to marriages, and 2) it does not have all four unities required to be a joint tenancy (O owned the property before devising it to himself and A, not satisfying the “vest at the same time” requirement).
If A and B own property as joint tenants, and B dies leaving a will devising her interest in the property to C, who owns the property?
A only.
Joint tenancies have rights of survivorship, so when one joint tenant dies, his interest is transferred to the surviving joint tenant. Joint tenancy interests cannot be devised by will, only during life. (This would remove the joint tenancy and create a tenancy in common, however.)
How will the proceeds from a partition sale of property initially held by four joint tenants (A, B, C, and D) be divided if A sold her interest to E, and B died, leaving her property to F and G?
C and D get 3/8 each; E gets 1/4
If two tenants in common are estranged, and only one tenant ever occupies the property, can the other tenant demand an accounting?
No, because the other tenant had the right to use the property but chose not to do so.
What is the lien theory (majority rule on the MBE) in relation to mortgages on joint tenancy property?
When one joint tenant obtains a mortgage on his interest in the land, it does not cause a severance of the joint tenancy.
Under the lien theory, if the joint tenant obtained a mortgage on his interest in the land and then died, the surviving joint tenant would take the title free and clear of the mortgage.
What is the title theory in relation to mortgages on joint tenancy property?
When a joint tenant obtains a mortgage on his interest in the land, the joint tenancy severs, creating a tenancy in common.
When does total eviction occur for a tenant?
When the landlord or a paramount title holder excluded the tenant from the entire leased premises.
This terminates the tenant’s obligation to pay rent.
When does partial eviction occur for a tenant?
When the tenant is excluded from only part of the leased premises.
Partial eviction by the landlord relieves the tenant of the obligation to pay rent for the entire premises, even though the tenant continues possession of the remainder of the premises.
Partial eviction by a paramount title holder results in an apportionment of rent (tenant liable for only the reasonable rental value of the portion that he continues to possess).
What is the implied warranty of habitability?
A covenant by the landlord that the premises are suitable for human residence. The standard usually applied is the local housing code.
(e.g., dangerously frayed wiring or faulty plumbing)
What is the doctrine of constructive eviction?
If a landlord’s breach renders the premises unsuitable for occupancy, the tenant may vacate the premises, terminate the lease, and sue for damages.
Under the doctrine of constructive eviction, if the landlord’s breach (i.e., doing an act or failing to provide some service that he has a legal duty to provide) makes the premises untenantable, the tenant may terminate the lease and also may seek damages if the following conditions are met:
1) The breach must be by the landlord or persons acting for him.
2) The breach must substantially and materially deprive the tenant of her use and enjoyment of the premises.
3( The tenant must give the landlord notice and a reasonable time to repair.
4) The tenant must vacate the premises within a reasonable amount of time.
May a tenant waive the implied warranty of habitability?
NO, because such a waiver is against public policy.
If L leases property to T, and L subsequently assigns L’s interest to L2, whom may T hold liable when X, a paramount title holder, ejects T?
L or L2
If L leases property to T, and L subsequently assigns L’s interest to L2, T may hold L or L2 liable when X, a paramount title holder, ejects T. A landlord may assign the rents and reversion interest that he owns. The assignee is liable to the tenants for performance of all covenants made by the original landlord in the lease, provided that those covenants run with the land. The original landlord also remains liable on all of the covenants he made in the lease. X’s evicting T from the entire leased premises breaches the covenant of quiet enjoyment, which runs with the land. Thus, L and L2 are personally liable to T.
What happens if a landlord has a covenant against assignment or sublease, but consents to a transfer that violates the covenant?
He waives his right to avoid future transfers.
When does a tenancy at will terminate?
Terminates by operation of law if:
1) Either party (T or L) dies;
2) The tenant commits waste;
3) The tenant attempts to assign his tenancy;
4) The landlord transfers her interest in the property;
5) The landlord executes a term lease to a third person.
If a landlord makes an contractual agreement for repairs with a tenant, then sells the property to a buyer, but the buyer does not consent to the obligations of the earlier agreement, what is the tenant’s recourse if he needs to enforce the agreement?
The tenant may recover the cost from either the landlord or the buyer.
A LL’s promise in a lease to maintain the property does not terminate because the property is sold. Although no longer in privity of estate, the original LL and tenant remain in privity of contract, and the original LL remains liable to the covenant unless there’s a novation. A novation requires consent of all parties and completely releases the original party, but since the buyer did not consent to be bound by the original contract, there was no novation, and the LL remains bound.
Generally, promises to do a physical act, such as maintain or repair the property, are considered to run with the land.
To acquire a prescriptive easement on property, the claimaint’s use does not need to be:
Exclusive
Requirements for prescriptive easements:
1) Open and notorious
2) Continuous
3) Adverse
If an easement is said to be surcharged, this means:
The easement’s legal scope was exceeded.
Is a long period of nonuse sufficient to terminate an easement?
Yes, if it is accompanied by other evidence of intent to abandon the easement.
What are the servient landowner’s rights regarding easement’s by necessity?
They have the right to choose the location of an easement by necessity, which arises when the owner of a tract of land sells a part of the tract and by this division deprives one lot of access to a public road or utility line.
Any alternative routes that the dominant landowner could have taken are restricted by the servient landowner’s choice.
In a residential subdivision, will a commercial builder be bound by a residential-use restriction that was omitted from his deed?
Yes, if the builder had inquiry notice of a common scheme for development.
In the absence of a writing, reciprocal negative servitudes may be implied if:
1) There is a common scheme for development;
2) The grantee has actual, record, or inquiry notice of the covenant.
In this case, inquiry notice exists if the neighborhood appeared to conform to common restrictions.
What is an equitable servitude?
A covenant that, regardless of whether it runs with the land at law, equity will enforce against the assignees of the burdened land who have notice of the covenant.
What is required for the burden of an equitable servitude to run to successors in interest?
1) The covenanting parties intended that successors in interest be bound by the covenant
2) The successor in interest has notice of the covenant if she has given value.
3) The covenant touches and concerns the land.
(Vertical privity between the covenantor and his successors in interest is not required)
If the buyer of land determines that the seller’s title is unmarketable, the buyer:
Must notify the seller and give reasonable time to cure the defects.
What is the effect on a real estate contract for a property containing a mortgage?
The title may still be marketable, since the seller can use the proceeds to pay off the mortgage simultaneously with the sale.