Contracts Hypo Notes - WIP Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Under Article 2, when an offeree proposes additional or different terms during acceptance, the court will apply __________ to determine whether the additional or different terms become part of the contract.

A

The battle of forms provision.

The BoF provision of Article 2 lists specific rules for determining what terms are included in a contract when the terms of acceptance do not match the terms of the offer.

Article 2 has abandoned the mirror image rule, which requires an absolute and unequivocal acceptance of each and every term of the offer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Under Article 2, when an offeree proposes additional or different terms as part of an otherwise valid acceptance, the acceptance __________.

A

Is effective, unless the acceptance is expressly made conditional on assent of the additional different terms.

Article 2 battle of the forms provision provides that the proposal of additional or different terms by the offeree in a definite and timely acceptance is effective as an acceptance, unless the acceptance is expressly made conditional on assent to the additional or different terms. Whether the additional or different terms become part of the contract depends on whether or not both parties are merchants.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Under the Article 2 battle of the forms provision, whether additional or different terms proposed by the offeree during acceptance ultimately become part of a contract depends on whether or not __________.

A

Both parties are merchants.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Which of the following best states the result when, in a contract between merchants for the sale of goods, the acceptance does not match the terms of the offer?

A

Additional terms that do not materially alter the original terms of the offer will be included in the contract, but different terms may be knocked out of the contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

A letter of revocation of an offer becomes effective at the moment it is __________.

A

Received by the offeree.

At common law, a written communication is considered to have been “received” when it comes into the possession of the person addressed (or of someone authorized by him to receive it) or when it is deposited in some place authorized as the place for this or similar communications to be deposited.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

A letter of acceptance of an offer becomes effective at the moment it is _________.

A

Dispatched. (The Mailbox Rule)

Under the mailbox rule, if the offeree dispatches an acceptance before he receives a revocation sent by the offeror, a contract is formed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

If a rejection letter is dispatched first, following by a change of heart and an acceptance letter, which rule applies?

A

The Mailbox Rule DOES NOT apply when rejection is mailed before acceptance. In this case, whichever is received first controls.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the relation between the Mailbox Rule and option contracts?

A

Mailbox Rule does not apply to option contracts. An acceptance under an option contract is effective only upon receipt.

If acceptance is not received within the time stated under the option contract, the offer is terminated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

A merchant who offers to buy or sell goods in a signed writing that gives assurances that the offer will be held open is offering:

A

A merchant’s firm offer.

Under Article 2, a merchant’s firm offer arises when a merchant offers to buy or sell goods in a signed writing that gives assurances that the offer will be held open. If no specific time frame is stated in the offer, a merchant’s firm offer will remain open for a reasonable time (but in no event may such period exceed three months).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is an option contract?

A

An option contract is a distinct contract in which the offeree gives consideration for a promise by the offeror not to revoke an outstanding offer for a period of time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is an offer for a unilateral contract?

A

One that can be accepted only by full performance.

Note that the beginning of performance may create an option so that the offer is irrevocable. However, the offeree is not obligated to complete performance merely because he has begun performance, as only complete performance constitutes an acceptance of the offer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is a confirmatory memo?

A

A method of satisfying the SoF in contracts between merchants. The rule states that if one party, within a reasonable time after an oral agreement has been made, send to the other party a written confirmation of the understanding that is sufficient under the SoF to bind the sender, it will also bind the recipient if:

1) He has reason to know of the confirmation’s contents, and
2) He does not object to it in writing within 10 days of receipt.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is required for a merchant’s firm offer under Article 2?

A

A written assurance signed by the offeror.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

An option contract is a distinct contract in which __________ a promise not to revoke an outstanding offer.

A

…an offeree gives consideration for…

An offer normally can be revoked at will by the offeror. An option contract is a distinct contract in which an offeree gives consideration for a promise by the offeror not to revoke an outstanding offer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the difference between a firm offer and an option contract?

A

An option contract requires that the offeree give consideration to keep the option open, whereas a merchant’s firm offer does not (only requires written assurance)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

When a contractor is under a contractual duty to construct a building and the building is destroyed by an act of nature while it is still a work in progress, the destruction __________.

A

Will not discharge the contractor’s duty to perform, but will extend the date of performance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

A building that is the subject of a contract between its owner and a contractor is completely destroyed by an act of nature.

If the contractor was working on a renovation, the destruction _____________; if the contractor was constructing the building, the destruction ________________.

A

Discharges the contractor’s duties by impossibility; does not discharge the contractor’s duties.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

When is a contractual duty to perform discharged without fault from either party?

A

When there is an OBJECTIVE impossibility of performing (no one could have performed).

No discharge if there is only a subjective impossibility (defendant could not have performed), because steps could have been taken to remedy and prevent breach.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What happens if, during the duration of a contract for the sale of goods, the goods are destroyed?

A

If the risk of loss has not yet passed to the buyer, the buyer avoids the contract and doesn’t have to pay.

Risk of loss for a nonmerchant buyer does not pass to the buyer until tender of the goods purchased.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is the preexisting legal duty rule?

A

The promise to perform, or the performance of, an existing legal duty is not consideration.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

How can one avoid the preexisting legal duty rule?

A

By modifying the original consideration slightly.

Courts are anxious to avoid the preexisting duty rule, which states that the promise to perform, or the performance of, an existing legal duty is not consideration. Thus modifying the original consideration, even slightly, is generally enough to avoid the rule.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What would be sufficient consideration for a promise by a creditor to discharge an existing debt?

A

An alternative method of payment, such as payment in a different medium, payment to one other than the creditor, or payment before maturity.

When the proposed consideration is in any way new or different (e.g., an alternative method of payment), there is usually sufficient consideration to change a preexisting duty, such as discharging an existing debt.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Generally speaking, a promise to perform an existing legal duty is _____________.

A

Not consideration.

A promise to perform an existing legal duty is not valuable consideration, unless an exception to the preexisting legal duty rule applies, e.g., new or different consideration is promised, or a minor’s ratification of a voidable contract upon reaching the age of majority.
Past consideration, which is also not sufficient consideration, is based on something already given or performed, not a promise to perform based on a preexisting legal duty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

How can one avoid the preexisting legal duty rule?

A

By modifying the original consideration slightly.

Courts are anxious to avoid the preexisting duty rule, which states that the promise to perform, or the performance of, an existing legal duty is not consideration. Thus modifying the original consideration, even slightly, is generally enough to avoid the rule.

25
Q

What would serve as sufficient consideration for a promise by a creditor to discharge an existing debt?

A

Since this is a preexisting duty, a modification of the original consideration, such as an alternative method of payment, is sufficient.

Mere acknowledgment of a preexisting duty is not sufficient consideration to change the preexisting duty.

Partial payment of the amount due on an existing debt is not sufficient consideration for a promise by the creditor to discharge the debt. Neither a legal detriment nor benefit is present.

Under the majority view, mere unforeseen difficulty in performance is not a substitute for consideration. Although the modern view permits modification without consideration if the modification is fair and equitable in view of circumstances not anticipated when the contract was made, it would not apply to payment of an existing debt. That exception to the consideration requirement applies only if the contract has not been fully performed on either side, and an existing debt suggests that the creditor has already performed. Also, as with impracticability, difficulty in paying money would be unlikely to be considered the type of unforeseen circumstance this view is intended to address.

26
Q

Does the preexisting duty rule apply to duties owed to third persons as an excuse to not pay on a contract?

A

No, the preexisting duty rule does not apply where the duty is owed to a third person. A D cannot refuse to pay on a contract by claiming that the P already owed the legal duty to a person other than the D.

27
Q

At common law, the Statute of Frauds requires __________ signed by __________.

A

A writing or writings reflecting the material items of the contract; (signed by) the party to be held liable.

28
Q

Under the UCC, a promise for the sale of goods priced at $500 or more is not enforceable under the SoF unless:

A

Evidenced by a writing signed by the party to be charged.

29
Q

For SoF, a memorandum following an oral contract for the sale of goods $500 or more generally requires a _____ term to be sufficient.

A

Quantity term.

In a memorandum, price terms may be proved by parol evidence, and are thus not required to be included in an enforceable SoF/memorandum contract.

30
Q

A contract for the sale of land that fails to mention the purchase price if:

A

Not enforceable under the SoF.

Contracts for the sale of land must be in writing, and the writing must contain all essential terms, and the price is considered an essential term.

31
Q

If an oral contract for the sale of property is found to be enforceable, despite SoF, what is the likely reason?

A

The conveyance of the property from the seller to the purchaser has already occurred.

Under the doctrine of part performance, conduct that unequivocally indicates that the parties have contracted for the sale of land will take the contract out of the Statute of Frauds.

32
Q

A writing is not required to enforce a contract that would otherwise be covered by the SoF if:

A

The party against whom enforcement is sought admits to the existence of the contract in court.

33
Q

In a contract for a sale of goods priced at $500 or more, if the goods are _________ or __________, the contract will be enforced even if there is no writing.

A

Received and accepted; paid for

If goods are either received and accepted or paid for, the contract is enforceable without a writing. However, the contract is not enforceable beyond the quantity of goods accepted or paid for. Thus, if only some of the goods called for in the oral contract are accepted or paid for, the contract is only partially enforceable.

34
Q

What is the “specially manufactured” exception for the SoF?

A

A writing is not required where the contract is for specially manufactured goods not suitable for resale in the ordinary court of the seller’s business and the seller has made a substantial beginning of their manufacture or commitments for the their procurement.

35
Q

Under the UCC, in the case of a single delivery contract, if the buyer finds that the goods are defective at the time of delivery:

A

The buyer can reject the goods, but the seller then has a right to cure within the original time for performance of the contract.

A buyer is not required to accept the defective goods. But if the seller properly cures the defect, the buyer must accept the cure or will be in breach of contract.

36
Q

Under the UCC, in a single delivery contract, a seller may always cure a shipment that the buyer has rejected because of defects by delivering conforming goods within:

A

The time originally provided for performance.

Ordinarily, the seller has no right to cure beyond the original contract time. However, in cases where the buyer rejects a tender of nonconforming goods that the seller reasonably believed would be acceptable “with or without money allowance,” the seller, on reasonable notification to the buyer, has a further reasonable time beyond the original contract time within which to make a conforming tender. A seller will probably be found to have had reasonable cause to believe that the tender would be acceptable if the seller can show that trade practices or prior dealings with the buyer led the seller to believe that the goods would be acceptable, or the seller could not have known of the defect despite proper business conduct.

37
Q

In a single delivery contract, when a buyer rejects goods due to defects, the seller may cure within the time originally provided for performance in the contract:

A

By giving reasonable notice to the buyer and making a new tender of conforming goods, which the buyer must then accept.

38
Q

The UCC gives a seller the right to cure a defective shipment within a reasonable time beyond the original time for performance in the contract if:

A

Prior dealing with the buyer led the seller to reasonably believe that the defective shipment would be acceptable.

Although notification of the desire to cure is required before the seller can cure the defective delivery, it is not enough that the seller notifies the buyer of his desire to cure before the time for performance in the original contract. To extend the right to cure beyond the original time of performance, the seller must show that he mistakenly, but reasonably, believed that the nonconforming goods would be acceptable to the buyer.

39
Q

A court order requiring a breaching party to perform under the contract or face contempt of court is also known as:

A

Specific performance.

40
Q

What is an injunction?

A

An injunction is usually a court order prohibiting someone from doing a specified act.

41
Q

What is replevin?

A

Replevin is a buyer’s right to replevy (recover) undelivered, identified goods from a seller under certain circumstances. Replevin will lie only in cases with identified goods.

42
Q

What contract type does not allow a nonbreaching party to seek specific performance?

A

A service contract.

One reason is the difficulty in supervising the performance, but the primary reason is that courts feel it is tantamount to involuntary servitude.

A nonbreaching party may seek specific performance only when the legal remedy is inadequate, such as when the subject matter of the contract is rare or unique. Specific performance is always available for land sale contracts because all land is considered to be unique.

43
Q

When a party that offers a rare or unique service has breached a service contract, the court may grant __________ to the nonbreaching party.

A

Injunctive relief

A court may grant injunctive relief to enjoin a breaching party from working for a competitor throughout the duration of the contract if the services contracted for are rare or unique.

44
Q

The right to specific performance in a land sale contract is cut off if the subject matter of the contract has already been sold to another who purchased for value and in good faith.

This is known as the equitable defense of:

A

Sale to a bona fide purchaser.

45
Q

What is the equitable defense of laches?

A

Arises when a party delays in bringing an equitable action and the delay prejudices the defendant. Note that mere delay itself is not a ground for this defense.

46
Q

What is the unclean hands defense?

A

Arises when the party seeking specific performance is guilty of some wrongdoing in the transaction being sued upon. Note that the wrongdoing must be related to the transaction being sued upon; it is not sufficient that the plaintiff has defrauded other persons in similar transactions.

47
Q

If the seller fails to deliver goods under a valid contract, what remedies are available to the buyer?

A

The right to cover and the right to obtain specific performance if appropriate.

A buyer may obtain specific performance of a contract for the sale of goods if the goods are unique or in short supply, but otherwise, if there are other sources of goods available, the buyer is obligated to cover and can then recover the difference in price if more was paid for the covered goods.

48
Q

Mirror Image Rule - UCC vs. Common Law

A

Common Law: acceptance must be IDENTICAL to terms of offer. Any change to the terms will result in rejection and counteroffer.

UCC: Any communication showing assent to the deal can form a contract. Acceptance to terms may differ from offer (i.e., Battle of the Forms)

49
Q

Bilater v. Unilateral Contract - UCC vs Common Law

A

USS: All contract - acceptance by promise to ship OR prompt shipment

Common Law:

  • Unilateral K: acceptance by performance only
  • Bilateral K: acceptance by promise only
50
Q

Modification of Contract - UCC vs. Common Law

A

Common Law: Modification needs consideration to be enforceable

UCC: Modification does not need consideration; just needs goods faith reason to modify

51
Q

Third Party Beneficiaries

A

1) Is the third party beneficiary intended or incidental?
2) Can the third party beneficiary sue? What defenses can be raised?
- creditor: can sue
- donee: cannot sue
3) Can the contract be modified or cancelled without third party beneficiary’s permission?
- when third party beneficiaries rights vest:
- – assents to contract
- – detrimentally relies on contract
- – brings lawsuit to enforce the contract

52
Q

What results from a mutual mistake?

A

Cancellation or modification of contract

53
Q

What results from a unilateral mistake?

A

Usually not a defense

Exception: Defense if non-mistaken party knew or should have known of the mistake.

54
Q

What is an express warranty, and does it require the seller to be a merchant?

A

An express warranty is any affirmation of fact made by a seller tro a buyer that relates to the goods and is part of the basis of the bargain.

Express warranties do not require the seller to be a merchant to be effective.

55
Q

What is an implied warranty, and does it require the seller to be a merchant?

A

An implied warranty is a warranty that is read into the agreement between a merchant and a buyer, and it requires that the seller be a merchant to be effective.

56
Q

What is the implied warranty of merchantability?

A

A warranty that the goods are fit for their ordinary purpose.

The seller must be a merchant who deals in good of the kind, having special knowledge about the particular goods being sold.

57
Q

What is the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose?

A

A warranty that the goods are fit for the buyer’s particular purpose.

The seller must know the buyer has a special purpose and is relying on the seller to select suitable goods.

This warranty does not require the seller to be a merchant.

58
Q

What warranties can a seller disclaim, and how?

A

A seller can disclaim only implied warranties, not express warranties.

The seller can include phrases in the agreement such as “as is” or “with all faults”.

In the absence of a magic phrase like the above, the disclaimer must be conspicuous.