Readings Flashcards
What does the paper “identifying natural images from human brain activity” try to do that previous studies haven’t done?
- Previous studies decoded orientation, position and object category from activity in the visual cortex using simple stimuli or images from fixed categories
- This study develops a decoding method based on quantitative receptive-field models that characterise the relationship between visual stimuli and fMRI activity in early visual areas
What do the receptive-field models used in the paper “identifying natural images from human brain activity” do?
-These models describe the tuning of individual voxels for space, orientation and spatial frequency and are estimated directly from responses evoked by natural images
What goal of neuroscience is the paper “identifying natural images from human brain activity” trying to help solve?
A goal in neuroscience is to be able to decode mental content from brain activity
What is the main result of the paper “identifying natural images from human brain activity”?
Results show that these receptive field models used make it possible to identify which specific image was seen by the observer from a large set of completely novel natural images
What does the result of “identifying natural images from human brain activity” say about spatial frequency?
- Simpler receptive-field models that describe only spatial tuning yield much poorer performance
- Results indicate that both orientation and spatial frequency tuning contribute to identification performance, but spatial frequency makes the larger contribution
What do the results of “identifying natural images from human brain activity” say about future possibilities in decoding brain activity?
Results suggest it may soon be possible to reconstruct a picture of a person’s visual experience from measurements of brain activity alone
What are the stages of the experiment in the paper “identifying natural images from human brain activity”?
Stage 1: estimate a receptive-field model for each voxel. Stage 2: measure brain activity for an image and predict brain activity for a set of images using receptive-field models. Select the image whose predicted brain activity is most similar to the measured brain activity
What was the best performance in the experiment in “identifying natural images from human brain activity”?
For one subject, 92% of images were identified correctly, based on results from activity patterns averaged across 13 repeated trials. Single trial performance was 51% for the same subject
What were the results about the retinotopy only model in “identifying natural images from human brain activity”?
The retinotopy-only model performed worse than the Gabor wavelet pyramid model in identification performance
What did the results from “identifying natural images from human brain activity” say about stimulus’s over time?
The stimulus-related information that can be decoded from voxel activity remains largely stable over time
What was the hypothesis of the paper “Attention during natural vision warps semantic representation across the human brain”?`
Hypothesis: attention causes tuning changes to expand the representation of attended stimuli at the cost of unattended stimuli
How was the hypothesis tested in “Attention during natural vision warps semantic representation across the human brain”?
Used fMRI to measure how semantic representation changed during visual search for different object categories in natural movies
What were 3 results of the paper “Attention during natural vision warps semantic representation across the human brain”?
- Many voxels across the cortex shifted their tuning toward the attended category. These tuning shifts expanded the representation of the attended category and of semantically related but unattended categories, and compressed the representation of categories that were semantically dissimilar to the target
- Attentional warping of semantic representation occurred even when the attended category was not present in the move, this means the effect was not a target-detection artefact
- Results suggest that attention dynamically alters visual representation to optimise processing of behaviourally relevant objects during natural vision
What is the semantic system according to “Natural speech reveals the semantic maps that tile human cerebral cortex”?
The meaning of language is represented in regions of the cerebral cortex collectively known as the semantic system
What did the experiment of “Natural speech reveals the semantic maps that tile human cerebral cortex” involve?
- Systematically map semantic selectivity across the cortex using voxel-wise modelling of fMRI data collected while subjects listened to narrative stories
- Then the paper used a novel generative model to create a detailed semantic atlas