Quiz One Flashcards

1
Q

Of norms for speaking and living a language, those regarding recognizing and categorizing things are _______ norms.

A

input

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Of norms for speaking and living a language, those regarding inferences and relationships between concepts are _______ norms.

A

inter-concept

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Of norms for speaking and living a language, those regarding what actions are licensed by our categorizations are _______ norms.

A

output

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q
  1. Concepts where there are right and wrong answers for their application, and in learning them, the student must always defer to the teacher’s corrections are ________ concepts.
A

objective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

For the (Benedict-styled) moral relativist, “It is good” is synonymous with “It is _______”

A

habitual

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q
  1. Descartes’s method for finding a criterion for truth is The Method of ________.
A

Doubt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q
  1. The top doubt-maker for Descartes is the hypothesis of an evil ________.
A

demon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q
  1. ‘Epistemic’ means having to do with _______.
A

knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q
  1. What is the name of this theory of truth? Beliefs are true when their contents correspond to the realities they are about.
A

The Correspondence Theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q
  1. The epistemic injustice of not being treated as a reliable source of information:
A

Testimonial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q
  1. The epistemic injustice of not having the concepts or vocabulary to communicate or make sense of one’s experiences.
A

Hermeneutic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q
  1. When an argument or piece of reasoning seems good, but it actually isn’t, it is a ___________.
A

Fallacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Haack’s argument from indispensability is that you can’t really have other political values or aspirations without a value of or an aspiration to truth.

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The Golden Rule (that you should treat others as you would want to be treated) depends on the assumption that others have minds and experiences like yours.

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q
  1. In the _________ person, minds are directly accessible. But not in the __________ or _______ person.
A

first, second, third

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q
  1. “What if your experience of blue is my experience of red?” That is the question of the _______
A

Inverted Spectrum

17
Q
  1. The problem of other minds might be generated by thinking a mind is like a __________ in a machine, or it is _________ inside bodies.
A

ghost, hiding

18
Q
  1. A statement made with indifference to its truth, but solely for the purpose of giving an impression of the speaker.
A

BS

19
Q
  1. A statement made with the intention of inducing false beliefs in the listener
A

Lie

20
Q
  1. A disagreement where the conflicting options are meaningful and exclusive, normative, but no one on any sides are blameworthy in the end is a _________ disagreement.
A

no-faul

21
Q
A