Quiz 4 Flashcards
Voidable
When a contract is voidable, the injured party may choose to terminate it
(Problems with capacity and consent)
can be canceled by a party who lacks legal capacity or who did not give true consent
Capacity
the legal ability to enter into a contract
Because a minor lacks legal capacity…
she normally can create only a voidable contract
Disaffirm
To give notice of refusal to be bound by an agreement
(A minor who wishes to escape from a contract generally may)
Rescind
To cancel a contract
A minor who disaffirms a contract…
return the consideration he has received, to the extent he is able
Restitution
Restoring an injured party to its original position
A minor may disaffirm a contract any time before she reaches age…
18
Ratification
Words or actions indicating an intention to be bound by a contract
On a contract for necessaries, a minor must pay for…
the value of the benefit received
(Exception: Misrepresentation of Age)
A person suffers from a mental impairment if…
by reason of mental illness or defect, he is unable to understand the nature and consequences of the transaction
A party suffering a mental impairment usually creates only a…
voidable contract
The law creates an exception: If a person has been adjudicated incompetent, then…
all of his future agreements are void
When one party is so intoxicated that he cannot understand the nature and consequences of the transaction…
the contract is voidable
A mentally infirm party who seeks to void a contract must make
restitution
An injured person must show the following:
- The defendant knew that his statement was false, or that he made the statement recklessly and without knowledge of whether it was false;
- The false statement was material; and
- The injured party justifiably relied on the statement.
(fraud!)
What does not amount to fraud
Opinions and “puffery”
(An opinion is not a statement of fact, A statement is puffery when a reasonable person would realize that it is a sales pitch, representing the exaggerated opinion of the seller. Puffery is not a statement of fact. Because puffery is not factual, it is never a basis for rescission)
For fraud, the injured party must show
grounds for rescinding a contract
Intentional or Reckless Misrepresentation of Fact
Materiality
Justifiable Reliance
In the case of fraud, the injured party generally has a choice of
rescinding the contract or suing for damages or, in some cases, doing both
(UCC §2–721 permits a party to rescind a contract and then sue for damages when fraud is committed)
Nondisclosure of a fact amounts to misrepresentation in these four cases:
where disclosure is necessary to correct a previous assertion,
where disclosure would correct a basic mistaken assumption that the other party is relying on,
where disclosure would correct the other party’s mistaken understanding about a writing, or
where there is a relationship of trust between the two parties.
A seller generally must report
any latent defect he knows about that the buyer should not be expected to discover himself
When one party naturally expects openness and honesty, based on a close relationship…
the other party must act accordingly
Unilateral mistake
Occurs when only one party enters a contract under a mistaken assumption
The injured party may rescind only upon a showing that the other party knew or had reason to know of the mistake, the mistake was solely mathematical or mechanical, or that enforcement would be unconscionable
To rescind for unilateral mistake, the mistaken party must demonstrate that he entered the contract because of a basic factual error and that:
The nonmistaken party knew or had reason to know of the error, or
The mistake is mathematical or mechanical alone, or
Enforcing the contract would be unconscionable.
If the nonmistaken party knows or has reason to know of the other party’s error…
courts will not allow him to profit by snapping it up
Mutual mistake
occurs when both contracting parties share the same mistake, if the contract is based on a fundamental factual error by both parties, the contract is voidable by either one
Duress
An improper threat made to force another party to enter into a contract
The victim had no reasonable alternative, the contract is voidable
In analyzing a claim of economic duress, courts look at these factors:
Acts that have no legitimate business purpose
Greatly unequal bargaining power
An unnaturally large gain for one party
Financial distress to one party