Quiz 3 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What was the early to mid-20th century perspective the role of disturbance in species communities?

A

Species communities were viewed as returning to equilibrium after a disturbance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Which of the following has been proposed about the relationship between disturbance and species invasion? (select best answer)

A

Disturbance facilitates invasion and invasion causes disturbance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Which of the following is true about crazy ant invasion on Christmas Island? (select all that are correct)
Removed red land crabs

Is an example of invasion resistance

Caused the loss of ground vegetation

Is an example of invasion meltdown

A

Removed red land crabs

Is an example of invasion meltdown

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Flashcard 1: Q: What is the broad definition of disturbance according to White & Pickett (1985)?

A

“Any relatively discrete event in time that disrupts ecosystem, community, or population structure and changes resources, substrate availability, or the physical environment.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Flashcard 2: Q: What are the types of disturbances?

A

A: Natural, Biotic, Human-caused, Abiotic, and Originate externally or internally.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Q: What are the key factors used to characterize a disturbance?

A

A: Intensity (Magnitude & Severity), Frequency (Number per unit time), Duration (Temporal extent), and Predictability (Regularity of occurrence).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Q: How does disturbance affect species adaptation and invasibility?

A

A: Disturbance provides open opportunities in a community, affecting native species’ adaptation and increasing the potential for invasibility.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Q: What disturbance characteristics can influence invasibility?

A

A: Severe intensity, High frequency, and High predictability. These can either favor native species or increase invasibility depending on the context.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Q: What is the ecological equilibrium theory?

A

A: Communities are considered equilibrium systems where disturbance is a temporary diversion, and communities return to equilibrium through regulating interactions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Q: What is ecological succession?

A

A: The predictable changes in a habitat following a disturbance. Primary succession involves early community development, and secondary succession follows initial colonization.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Q: How does the equilibrium theory compare to the nonequilibrium theory of communities?

A

A: The nonequilibrium theory, which emerged in the 1980s, proposes that natural disturbances prevent populations from reaching equilibrium, with some communities never at equilibrium.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Q: How does an invasive species act as a disturbance?

A

A: An invasive species can act as a disturbance by being a keystone species that alters community dynamics or as an ecosystem engineer that changes ecosystem properties.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Q: What are the effects of invasive species like house cats and cane toads?

A

A: House cats reduce native faunal communities through predation, while cane toads disrupt native predator-prey dynamics.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How do invasive species act as ecosystem engineers?

A

A: Species like earthworms can fundamentally alter ecosystems by changing soil properties, affecting plant growth, and disrupting native vegetation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Q: What is “Invasion Meltdown”?

A

A: A self-perpetuating cycle where invasive species facilitate further invasions or greater impacts, creating positive feedback loops.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Q: What is the Fluctuating Resource Hypothesis?

A

A: It suggests that communities are more susceptible to invasion when there is an increase in unused resources, as disturbance provides a pulse in resource availability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Q: What factors make disturbance a facilitator of invasion?

A

A: Disturbance creates open opportunities, increases resource supply, and provides space and light, all of which can facilitate invasion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What does Davis’s conceptual model of habitat invasibility explain?

A

A: It explains that habitat invasibility is determined by the gross resource supply and resource uptake, where an increase in resources and a decrease in resource uptake can facilitate invasion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

How does clearing vegetation affect invasibility in Davis’s model?

A

A: In plot 1, clearing all vegetation reduces resource uptake, which may increase invasibility, shifting the plot down along the y-axis of the model.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Q: What is the potential for native species adaptation in tropical rainforests and pine forests?

A

A: Tropical rainforests may have native species with high dispersal ability and long seed dormancy periods to adapt to disturbances, while pine forests have high potential for adaptation due to the frequency and predictability of fire.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Q: How does disturbance influence the equilibrium vs. non-equilibrium theory in tropical rainforests and pine forests?

A

A: Rainforests operate near equilibrium with low-frequency tree falls, while pine forests exist at a non-equilibrium state due to frequent fire disturbances.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What are the two factors used in Davis’s model of invasibility?

A
  • Gross resource supply
  • Resource uptake
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Davis’s model of habitat invasibility is based on what ecological hypothesis?

A

Fluctuating Resource Hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

A landscaper is hired to work on two plots that are overgrown with a mixture of native and non-native
species. In plot 1, the landscaper clears all of the existing vegetation and carries it to a landfill. In plot 2,
the landscaper shreds the overgrown vegetation and mixes it into the soil. The landscaper plants smaller
well-spaced native species in an aesthetically pleasing way in both plots. Compare and contrast these
two plots in terms of Davis’s conceptual model of invasibility

A

Plot 1. The removal of all of the cut vegetation does not affect the gross resource supply. However, the
planting of fewer plants reduces the resource uptake, thus, may result in greater invasibility of the plot.
On the Davis conceptual model this would be exemplified by moving down along the y-axis.
Plot 2. The shredding of the cut vegetation and leaving in in the plot increases the gross resource supply
by creating a nutrient influx. Also, and reduces the resource uptake of resources by the plants. On the
Davis conceptual model this would be exemplified by moving down along the y-axis AND up along the x-
axis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What is an ‘invasion meltdown’?

A

When an invasive species have impacts that lead to invasion by other species and/or has impacts that cascade through a community

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Which of the following was NOT ultimately caused by invasion of crazy ants on Christmas Island?

Canopy dieback
Vegetation grown on the forest floor
increase in sooty mold
Reduction in red crabs
Decline in ground vegetation
Increase in scale insects

A

Decline in ground vegetation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

How did the authors demonstrate effects of crazy ants on the biotic communities on Christmas Island?

Set up replicated plots in area of the island that were ‘invaded’ and ‘not invaded’ by the crazy ant
Ran transects through the forest
All of these methods were used in this study.
Collected data from published studies using a meta-analysis

A

Set up replicated plots in area of the island that were ‘invaded’ and ‘not invaded’ by the crazy ant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Odowd: Specifically, what do the authors mean by ‘displacement of a native ‘keystone’ species?

A

A keystone species is a species that has a disproportionately large effect on an ecosystem
and/or biotic community. Displacement of a native ‘keystone’ species means that the keystone
species is effectively removed (or greatly reduced ) from the environment and, thus, this has
large effects on the biotic community and/or ecosystem.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Odowd: Describe the time scale and process (not impacts) by which the crazy ant invaded Christmas
Island.

A

After crazy ants were introduced to Christmas Island, they remained at a relatively low density
for several decades before they seemed to evolve the ability to form super colonies, which are
multi-queen colonies. These super colonies allowed the crazy ant to increase greatly in density
and become invasive on the island.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

In the methods, the authors ‘paired’ sites with and without ants. Do you know what this means?
Why would they use this approach?

A

Even a small island like Christmas Island may have very different environmental conditions
(habitat heterogeneity) across the island. This will cause greater variation in data collected
among the sites, which in turn may make it more difficult to detect differences among the
treatments. In this case, the treatments are the high densities and absence (or low densities) of
crazy ants. Pairing similar (or nearby) sites and analyzing the data in a way that compares each
of these paired sites will reduce the variation in the estimates, thus, can be a more powerful
method than simply calculating overall means for each treatment

31
Q

How did the invasion of crazy ants seem to affect the tree Inocarus fagifer? In addition to being
a canopy tree, what quality of this tree may make it an important component of the ecosystem?

A

Crazy ant invasion facilitated an increase in scale insect density. The scale insects create an
excrement called honeydew, which is high in sugar. The honeydew is fed upon by the ants, but
also falls on tree leaves and attracts a sooty mold, which causes dieback of the Inocarus fagifer.
I. fagifer is a nitrogen fixer, which is important for making nitrogen available to other plants in
the ecosystem. The reduction in I. fagifer, therefore, reduces resources available to the entire
plant community

32
Q

What role did mutualism plays a role in the crazy ant invasion and its impacts?

A

scale insects create honeydew, which is a nutrient resource for crazy ants. In
return, crazy ants defend the scale insects from predators.

33
Q

Imagine a fictitious history of Christmas Island. In this history, the red crab and crazy ant were
absent from Christmas Island before human habitation. Humans then introduced the red crab
and its population grew and spread across the island. The crazy ant is never on the island in this
history. What story would we be telling if this were the true history of Christmas Island?

A

If red crabs were absent from Christmas Island, we would expect that ‘natural’ state of the
island habitat to have a thick vegetative understory. If the red crab were introduced, it would
lack a predator, increase to very high densities, and feed voraciously on seed and seedlings,
which would cause a habitat shift to a largely vegetation-free understory. In this class, we might
have been talking about the negative effects of the red crab on Christmas Island and its lush
understory vegetation.

34
Q

Which of the following is part of the explanation for the invasion paradox? (select all that are correct)
Small scale studies measure alpha diversity.
Areas with a diversity of habitats will tend to have greater species diversity.
Experimental studies can manipulate one factor at a time.
Large scale studies measure gamma diversity.

A

all are correct

35
Q

Which of the following examples is consistent with the Biotic Resistance Hypothesis? (select all that are correct)
The red rock crab predates the green crab in Oregon.
The crazy ants on Christmas island formed a mutualism with scale insects.
The Whelk Nucella ostrina predates the non-native mussel Mytilus galloprovincalis but not the native M. californianus.
Parker et al (2006) showed that native herbivores reduced the abundance of exotic (non-native) plants.

A

The red rock crab predates the green crab in Oregon.

The crazy ants on Christmas island formed a mutualism with scale insects.

Parker et al (2006) showed that native herbivores reduced the abundance of exotic (non-native) plants.

36
Q

If a non-native species requires an obligate mutualist, then what how is that expected to affect the likelihood of becoming a non-native invader?
Decrease the likelihood of invasion
Has no effect
Increase the likelihood of invasion

A

Decrease the likelihood of invasion

37
Q

Q: What are the three types of biotic interactions?

A

A:

Competition (-/-)
Predation/Herbivory/Parasitism (+/-)
Mutualism (+/+)

38
Q

Q: What did Charles Elton believe regarding biotic resistance to invasion?

A

He believed that competition would be an important component of biotic resistance to invasion.

39
Q

Q: What is the implication of scarce resources in relation to biotic resistance through competition?

A

A: Biotic resistance through competition should be greater when resources are scarce, but this is not always the case

40
Q

Q: What did the study on non-native trees on Christmas Island show about competition and predation?

A

A: The survival of non-native trees was higher on the forest edge than in the forest interior, suggesting habitat differences in competition and predation.

41
Q

Q: What did Knops et al. (1999) find in their manipulation experiments regarding plant species richness and invasibility?

A

A: They found negative relationships between plant species richness and biomass of non-native species, as well as increased invasibility and plant fungal diseases when richness was reduced.

42
Q

Q: What is the “Invasion Paradox”?

A

A: The paradox arises from different study methods showing opposite results of species richness on invasibility.

43
Q

Q: What factors do observational studies lack control over?

A

A: Observational studies often lack control over factors such as climate, soil fertility, disturbance, and habitat area, leading to the Invasion Paradox.

44
Q

Q: What are the three types of predation or parasitism interactions?

A

A:
A. Predator-prey: Predator kills animal prey.
B. Host-parasite: Parasite does not kill the animal host.
C. Plant-Herbivore: Herbivore does not kill the plant host.

45
Q

Q: What is co-evolution?

A

A: Co-evolution is the reciprocal evolutionary change between interacting species, such as a host evolving defenses and a parasite evolving counter-defenses.

46
Q

Q: What is the Biotic Resistance Hypothesis?

A

A: It suggests that introduced species have not evolved defenses to protect against native predators, making them more vulnerable to predation.

47
Q

Q: What is the Natural Enemies Hypothesis in the context of invasion?

A

A: It suggests that non-native species can spread because native predators have not evolved strategies to overcome their defenses.

48
Q

Q: What did the study by Shinen et al. (2009) on whelk predation show about non-native mussels?

A

A: It showed that whelk predation was higher on the non-native mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis), leading to lower survival compared to the native mussel (Mytilus californianus).

49
Q

Q: What did the study on predation by red rock crabs suggest about European green crab invasion?

A

A: It suggested that red rock crab predation on small European green crabs prevented their establishment in certain areas.

50
Q

Q: What was the conclusion of Parker et al. (2006) about the effect of herbivores on plant invasion?

A

A: Native herbivores reduced the cover or biomass of non-native plants, supporting the Biotic Resistance Hypothesis, while non-native herbivores facilitated the spread of non-native plants.

51
Q

Q: What role did fig wasps play in preventing fig tree invasion in South Florida?

A

A: Native fig wasps did not pollinate non-native fig trees in South Florida, preventing their reproduction and invasion.

52
Q

Q: How does the presence or absence of mutualists affect invasion success?

A

A: Obligate mutualists, like fig wasps for fig trees, can prevent the invasion of non-native species, while facultative mutualists are less likely to have this effect.

53
Q

Q: In the experimental and observational approaches to studying the relationship between native species diversity and invasion in Virginia, what results would you expect to find? experimental vs observational positive or negative relationship?

A

A:

Approach 1 (experimental): A negative relationship between native species diversity and non-native invasion.
Approach 2 (observational): A positive relationship between native species diversity and non-native invasion.

54
Q

Q: Why might experimental and observational studies give different results regarding species richness and invasibility?

A

A: Experimental studies control extrinsic factors (like climate), while observational studies cannot control these factors, leading to confounding results.

55
Q

What is the fundamental difference between the ‘Optimal Defense Theory’ (ODT) and the ‘Increased Competitive Ability Hypothesis’ (CAH)?

ODT refers to herbovores while CAH is about animal predators.
ODT predicts negative effects on non-natives while CAH predicts non-native advantage.
All answers are correct
ODT predicts reallocation of energy in response to the absence of predators within one generation, while the CAH predicts evolution of change in the allocation of energy.

A

ODT predicts reallocation of energy in response to the absence of predators within one generation, while the CAH predicts evolution of change in the allocation of energy.

56
Q

What was the effect of non-native grazers in California?

Had no effect on plant species richness.
Reduced species richness of native and non-native plants
Reduced species richness of non-native plants
Reduced species richness of native plants

A

Reduced species richness of native plants

57
Q

What was the effect of feral pigs on plant species richness in California?
Facilitated non-native plant replacement of native plants
Increases species richness of native and non-native plants
Increased species richness of native plants
Increased species richness of non-native plants

A

Increased species richness of non-native plants

58
Q

Q: What is the Biotic Resistance Hypothesis?

A

A: The Biotic Resistance Hypothesis suggests that introduced species lack defenses against predation by native predators, making them vulnerable.

59
Q

Q: What is the Natural Enemies Hypothesis (Enemy Release Hypothesis)?

A

A: The Natural Enemies Hypothesis, also called the Enemy Release Hypothesis (ERH), suggests that non-native species have an advantage over native species because they are released from predation, parasitism, and herbivory, which helps them spread.

60
Q

Q: What does the Optimal Defense Theory propose?

A

A: The Optimal Defense Theory suggests that species without natural enemies will reallocate defensive energy towards increasing fitness, such as growth or reproduction.

61
Q

Q: In the context of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum), what happens to nectar allocation in response to herbivory?

A

A: When herbivory occurs, cotton reallocates nectar from flowers to extra-floral nectaries, increasing its defense from herbivores.

62
Q
A
63
Q

Q: What is the Increased Competitive Ability Hypothesis?

A

A: The Increased Competitive Ability Hypothesis suggests that non-native species evolve to be better competitors in the absence of natural enemies.

64
Q

Q: How can non-native grazers facilitate the invasion of non-native species?

A

A: Non-native grazers can facilitate invasion by altering grazing behavior or intensity in a way that reduces native species richness without affecting non-native species.

65
Q

Q: What was the result of Sarah Kimball’s study on grazing in California grasslands?

A

A: Kimball’s study found that grazing reduced native species richness in California grasslands, but non-native species richness was not affected.

66
Q

Q: What is “Invasion Meltdown,” and how did feral pigs contribute to it in California?

A

A: Invasion Meltdown refers to a process where invasive species facilitate each other’s spread. In California, feral pigs disturbed the soil, decreasing plant species richness initially, but later non-native species richness increased, though non-natives did not replace natives.

67
Q

In its native habitat, a species of mouse is at a high risk of predation by diurnal hawks and to a lesser extent by
nocturnal owls. As a predator defense, the mouse is inactive in the day, and at night limits the mouse only
forages for food at the edge of thick cover so they can quickly escape the nocturnal predators. This behavior
limits the mouse’s ability to gather food, which in turn regulates the reproductive rates and lowers the
population growth rate of the mouse. However, the mouse was introduced to an island that lacks predators.
Over the next several decades the mouse maintained its predator defense behavior. But then the mouse
population evolved a change in behavior wherein it became active in day and night AND would forage far from
cover. This resulted in the mouse population exploding on the island and becoming invasive.

Q1: What concept describes the change in conditions from the native to non-native habitat that benefited the introduced mouse?

Q2: What concept explains how the mouse species became invasive?

Q3: If the mouse had changed its behavior quickly after arriving on the island, what concept would apply?

Flashcard 4
Q4: Which of the answers to the previous questions aligns with the concept of “plasticity”?

Flashcard 5
Q5: What was the effect of non-native grazers on the California grassland?

Flashcard 6
Q6: How are the non-native grazers and feral pigs in California similar?

Flashcard 7
Q7: Why do the non-native grazers and feral pigs in California not fit the Biotic Resistance or Enemy Release Hypotheses?

A

A1: Natural Enemies Hypothesis (a.k.a. Enemy Release Hypothesis)

A2: Increased Competitive Ability Hypothesis

A3: Optimal Defense Theory

A4: Optimal Defense Theory

A5: Non-native grazers reduced native plant species richness, but had no effect on non-native plant species richness.

A6: Both reduce native species richness and increase non-native species richness by disturbing the habitat.

A7: These hypotheses apply to native predators, but the grazers and pigs create disturbances in the habitat, increasing invasibility for non-native species.

68
Q

According to our class lecture, which of the following likely prevented invasion of the green crab into colder and more saline waters of the Pacific Ocean in Oregon?
Mutualism
Predation
Competition
Abiotic factors

A

Predation

69
Q

Which of the following concepts did the Parker et al. (2006) paper “Opposing effects of native and exotic herbivores on plant invasions” support?
a. Enemy release hypothesis
b. Biotic resistance hypothesis
c. Invasion meltdown
d. a & c
e. b& c

A

e. b and c

70
Q

How do non-native earthworms affect North American habitat?
a. Native earthworms dig burrows and mix soil while non-native earthworms live only in the litter and upper soil layer.
b. Non-native earthworms increase understory growth in North American forests.
c. Non-native earthworms dig burrows and mix soil while native earthworms live only in the litter and upper soil layer.
d. a & c
e. b & c

A

Non-native earthworms dig burrows and mix soil while native earthworms live only in the litter and upper soil layer.

71
Q

A freak storm causes a large tree-fall event in a Norwegian forest. This disturbance opens up the forest canopy, which increases the amount of sunlight to reach the forest floor and, in turn, facilitates the establishment of non-native plants. Which of the following hypotheses does this scenario describe?

Natural Enemies Hypothesis

Invasion Paradox

Fluctuating Resource Hypothesis

Ten’s Rule

A

Fluctuating resources hypothesis

72
Q

Which pair of disturbance characteristics is most likely to result in native advantage over non-natives (decreased invasibility)?
Low intensity and low frequency
High frequency and high predictability
Low intensity and short duration
Short duration and low frequency

A

High frequency and high predictability

73
Q

Seeds of a non-native species of plant are introduced on an island where there are no natural enemies. The seeds germinate and the plants grow from seedlings to mature plants. There are no herbivores damaging the plants, so within a few decades the plants evolve the ability to reallocate energy from defensive compound production to growth. This allows the plant to outgrow and shade out native plants, produce more seeds, and increase the fitness. This occurs across several generations. What concept best fits this scenario?
Increased Competitive Ability Hypothesis
Optimal Defense Theory
Biotic Resistance
Invasion Meltdown

A

Increased Competitive Ability Hypothesis