Quiz 2 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Loftus and Zanni

A

Suggestive/leading questioning can influence responses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

High stress levels

A

result in poorer memory for both the perpetrator’s appearance and other crime details

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The race of the eyewitness

A

Eyewitnesses are better able to correctly identify a member of their own race compared to a member of a different race

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

weapon focus

A

If a weapon is present, witnesses often focus on that (a term called weapon focus) and therefore have a less reliable memory for other aspects of the crime (Saunders, 2009).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Estimator variables

A

are those variables or factors that are present at the time of the crime and cannot be changed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

System variables

A

are those variables or factors that can be manipulated to increase (or decrease) eyewitness accuracy, such as the type of procedure used by police to interview the witness or the type of lineup procedure used to present the suspect to the witness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Open-ended recall

A

witnesses are asked to either write or orally state all they remember about the event without the officer (or experimenter) asking questions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Direct question recall

A

witnesses are asked a series of specific questions about the crime or the perpetrator.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

perpetrator lineup

A

a set of people presented to the witness, who in turn must identify the perpetrator if they are present.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Clothing lineups

A

the witness examines clothing that may have been worn by the perpetrator, are sometimes also used.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Fisher and colleagues (1987)

A

They analyzed 11 tape-recorded interviews from a police department in Florida. Eight detectives, who averaged 10.5 years of experience each, conducted these interviews. The researchers found a lot of variation in how the interviews were conducted. In general, however, the researchers found that the officers would introduce themselves, ask the eyewitnesses to report what they remembered by using an open-ended format, and then ask the witnesses a series of direct questions to determine specific information, such as the age or height of the perpetrator.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Memory Conformity (Douglass & Pavletic, 2011)

A

Witnesses can be “contaminated” if they know what other witnesses have reported. What one witness says about a crime can affect what another witness will say if those witnesses communicate with one another or come to learn what the other has reported

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The misinformation effect, also called the Post-event information effect

A

is a phenomenon in which a witness who is presented with inaccurate information after an event will incorporate that misinformation into a subsequent recall task (Loftus, 1975).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

cognitive interview

A

The cognitive interview can be used with eyewitnesses, but it is not a procedure recommended for use with unwilling participants, such as suspects. The cognitive interview is based on four memory retrieval techniques to increase recall: (1) reinstating the context, (2) reporting everything, (3) reversing order, and (4) changing perspective.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

enhanced cognitive interview

A

including various principles of social dynamics in addition to the memory retrieval principles used in the original cognitive interview.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Foils or Distractors

A

placing a suspect in a lineup, other lineup members may be included. Can use similarity to suspect or match to description. These people are innocent of the crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

target-present lineup

A

A lineup that contains the perpetrator

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

target-absent lineup

A

the lineup does not contain perpetrator but rather an innocent suspect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Reasons why photo arrays are more common than lineups

A

-Less time-consuming
-They are portable
-Suspect does not have to present
-Photos are static
-Witness will be less anxious

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

simultaneous lineup

A

The simultaneous procedure presents all lineup members at one time to the witness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

relative judgment

A

lineup members are compared with one another and the person who looks most like the perpetrator is identified.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

sequential lineup

A

involves presenting the lineup members serially to the witness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

absolute judgment

A

each lineup member is compared with the witness’ memory of the perpetrator and the witness decides whether it is the perpetrator.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

showup

A

This procedure shows one person to the witness: the suspect. The witness is asked whether the person is the perpetrator.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

walk-by

A

This identification occurs in a naturalistic environment. The police take the witness to a public location where the suspect is likely to be. Once the suspect is in view, the witness is asked whether they see the perpetrator.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Lineup Biases

A
  1. Foil bias. The suspect is the only lineup member who matches the description of the perpetrator. For example, the suspect has a beard and moustache while the other lineup members are clean-shaven (Lindsay, Lea, & Fulford, 1991).
  2. Clothing bias. The suspect is the only lineup member wearing clothing similar to that worn by the perpetrator. For example, the perpetrator was described as wearing a blue baseball cap. The suspect is wearing a blue baseball cap while the foils are not (Dysart, Lindsay, & Dupuis, 2006; Lindsay et al., 1991; Lindsay, Wallbridge, & Drennan, 1987).
  3. Instruction bias. The police fail to mention to the witness that the perpetrator may not be present; rather, the police imply that the perpetrator is present and that the witness should pick them out (Clark, 2005; Malpass & Devine, 1981; Steblay, 1997).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

cross-race effect, also known as the other-race effect and the own-race bias

A

the phenomenon of witnesses remembering faces of people of their own race with greater accuracy than they remember faces of people of other races

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Weapon focus

A

the term used to describe the phenomenon of a witness’ attention being focused on the perpetrator’s weapon rather than on the perpetrator (Steblay, 1992)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

cue-utilization hypothesis

A

explain why a witness may focus on the weapon rather than other details. The hypothesis suggests that when emotional arousal increases, attentional capacity decreases.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

anatomically detailed dolls

A

anatomically detailed dolls to see if child has been sexually abused , sometimes like a rag doll, are consistent with the male or female anatomy. Dolls may be of an adult male or female or a young male or female.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

narrative elaboration

A

With this procedure, children learn to organize stories into relevant categories: Participants, Settings, Actions, Conversation/affective states, Consequences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

False memory syndrome

A

a term coined to describe clients’ false beliefs that they were sexually abused as children. Clients may have no memories of this abuse until they enter therapy to deal with some other psychological problem, such as depression or substance abuse (Read, 1999)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

elimination lineup

A

The elimination lineup procedure requests two judgments from the child: All lineup photos are presented to the child, and the child is asked to select the lineup member who looks most like the culprit (relative judgment). Once this decision is made, the remaining photos are removed.The child is asked to compare their memory of the culprit with the most similar photo selected in the first stage and to decide if the photo is of the culprit (absolute judgment).

34
Q

in need of protection

A

used to describe a child’s need to be separated from their caregiver because of maltreatment.

35
Q

representativeness

A

A composition that represents the community in which the crime occurred

36
Q

impartiality.

A

A lack of bias on the part of jurors,

37
Q

adjournment

A

delaying the trial until sometime in the future

38
Q

jury nullification

A

there are cases in which the jury will ignore that law and the evidence and render a verdict based on some other criteria.

39
Q

Chaos theory

A

predicts that when jurors are guided by their emotions and personal biases rather than by the law, chaos in judgments results

40
Q

Archives

A

Records of trials, such as transcripts and police interviews of witnesses, can be reviewed to uncover relationships among variables.

41
Q

Simulation

A

One of the most common methodologies used to investigate jury issues is simulation. Researchers simulate a trial, or aspects of it, by using a written, audio, or video format. Participants are presented with the trial information, and the researcher can vary and manipulate this trial information.

42
Q

Field Studies

A

This methodology involves using actual jurors while they are serving on jury duty, so cooperation from the courts and the jurors is required. Researchers are able to observe variables of interest as they are occurring.

43
Q

deliberation

A

the jurors discuss the evidence privately among themselves to reach a verdict, which is then provided to the court.

44
Q

Note-taking juror

A

No negative impact

45
Q

Kassin and Sommers

A

concluded that jurors will disregard evidence when they are provided with a logical and legitimate reason for the judge’s decision to disregard it.

46
Q

Four reforms for judges’ instructions have been proposed

A

(1) rewriting instructions, (2) providing a written copy of the instructions to jurors, (3) providing jurors with pre- and post-evidence instructions, and (4) having lawyers clarify legal instructions during their presentation to the jury.

47
Q

MATHEMATICAL MODELS

A

he common theme with mathematical models is that they view jurors as conducting a set of mental calculations regarding the importance and strength of each piece of evidence

48
Q

EXPLANATION MODELS

A

In contrast to mathematical models, explanation models suggest that evidence is organized into a coherent whole. Pennington and Hastie’s (1986) explanation approach is called the story model

49
Q

polarization

A

when individuals tend to become more extreme in their initial position following a group discussion (Baron & Bryne, 1991).

50
Q

leniency bias

A

whereby jurors move toward greater leniency following deliberations (MacCoun & Kerr, 1988).

51
Q

hung jury

A

A Canadian jury must reach a unanimous criminal verdict. If it cannot, the jury is said to be a hung jury or deadlocked, and a mistrial is declared.

52
Q

Demographic Variables

A

Variables such as the gender, race, socioeconomic status, and education of jurors are demographic variables that have been examined, in part because they are readily available to attorneys but also because they can be used to challenge witnesses.

53
Q

Racial bias

A

disparate treatment of racial outgroups.

Participants were more likely to render guilty verdicts for “other-race” defendants than for defendants of their own race.

54
Q

black sheep effect

A

When the evidence was strong, race similarity between defendant and jury led to punitiveness.

55
Q

Unfortunately, when using juror demographic variables to predict verdicts

A

results are less than reliable

56
Q

mall relationship between the attractiveness of the defendant and..

A

Jury verdict

57
Q

if jurors hear about a defendant’s prior criminal record that contains one or more convictions,..

A

they are more likely to find the defendant guilty than if they did not have this knowledge

58
Q

R. v. Darrach (2000)

A

Darrach appealed his conviction, arguing that he did not receive a fair trial because he was unable to present information about his prior sexual history with the accuser. Darrach stated that, given his past relationship with the accused, he thought that the sexual encounter was consensual.

59
Q

What influence does expert evidence have on jurors’ decisions?

A

Gender, age, complexity

60
Q

actus reus

A

a wrongful deed

61
Q

mens rea

A

criminal intent

62
Q

unfit to stand trial

A

refers to a defendant’s inability to conduct a defence at any stage of the proceedings on account of a mental disorder.

63
Q

R. v. Balliram (2003)

A

it was concluded that an unfit person could not be sentenced. The degree of impairment necessary for an unfit determination has been difficult to pinpoint, however.

64
Q

R. v. Taylor (1992

A

In this case, the Ontario Court of Appeal stated that the test to be applied in terms of “communication with counsel” is with regard to limited cognitive capacity. The court ruled that a defendant need only be able to state the facts relating to the offence that would allow an appropriate defence.

65
Q

Competency Screening Test (CST)

A

has 22 uncompleted sentences that the respondent must finish. For example, The lawyer told Bill that . . .When I go to court the lawyer will . . .Jack felt that the judge . . .

The items measure three constructs: the potential for a constructive relationship between the defendant and their lawyer, the defendant’s understanding of the court process, and the ability of the defendant to emotionally cope with the criminal process.

66
Q

Competency to Stand Trial Assessment Instrument (CAI)

A

semi-structured interview and constitutes a comprehensive competency evaluation. The CAI assesses 13 functions corresponding to a defendant’s ability to participate in the criminal process on behalf of their best interests. Each function is represented in a statement with two or three sample questions that the evaluator may pose to the defendant.

67
Q

Interdisciplinary Fitness Interview (IFI)

A

the IFI is a semi-structured interview measuring three areas of competency: functional memory, appropriate relationship with attorney, and understanding of the justice system. There are four main sections to the IFI: Section A: Legal itemsSection B: Psychopathological itemsSection C: Overall evaluationSection D: Consensual judgment

68
Q

MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool—Criminal Adjudication (MacCAT-CA)

A

The MacCAT-CA (Hoge, Bonnie, Poythress, & Monahan, 1992) is a structured interview containing 22 items that assess competencies in three areas: Factual understanding of the legal system and the adjudication processReasoning abilityUnderstanding of own legal situation and circumstances

69
Q

How Is Fitness Restored?

A

When a defendant is found unfit to stand trial, the goal of the criminal justice system is to get the defendant fit. The most common form of treatment for fitness is medication.

70
Q

What Happens after a Finding of Unfitness?

A

The proceedings against a defendant who is found unfit to stand trial are halted until competency is restored.

71
Q

prima facie case

A

the Crown must prove that there is sufficient evidence to bring the case to trial

72
Q

Insanity

A

Impairment of mental or emotional functioning that effects perceptions, beliefs, and motivations at the time of the offence.

73
Q

Review boards

A

legal bodies were mandated to oversee the care and disposition of defendants found unfit or NCRMD. Review boards were required to review each unfit and NCRMD case every year.

74
Q

Richard Rogers developed the first standardized assessment scales for criminal responsibility: the Rogers Criminal Responsibility Assessment Scales (R-CRAS; Rogers, 1984). The R-CRAS is the only instrument of its kind. It has five scales:

A

Patient reliability, Organicity, Psychopathology, Cognitive control, Behavioural control

75
Q

absolute discharge

A

the defendant is released into the community without restrictions on their behaviour.

76
Q

conditional discharge

A

defendant is released but must meet certain conditions, such as not possessing firearms. Failure to meet the conditions imposed with a conditional discharge may result in the defendant being incarcerated or sent to a psychiatric facility.

77
Q

capping

A

which refers to the maximum period of time a person with a mental illness can be affected by their disposition.

78
Q

Automatism

A

refers to unconscious, involuntary behaviour; that is, the person committing the act is not aware of what they are doing.

79
Q

community treatment order

A

allows the offender who has a mental illness to live in the community, with the stipulation that they will agree to treatment or detention in the event that their condition deteriorates.

80
Q

diversion

A

diverting the offenders directly into a treatment program rather than having them go through the court process.

81
Q

Women had higher rates of mood personality disorders, whereas men had higher rates of…

A

psychotic disorders