Quiz Flashcards

1
Q

Confounding definition

A

confusion, or mixing, of effects; the effect of the exposure of interest is distorted because the effect of an extraneous factor is mistaken for or mixed with the actual exposure effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Confounding occurs when…

A

an extraneous variable, either partially or completely accounts for an apparent association between study variable and outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

primary prevention (association)

A

causal association between the risk factor and disease must exist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

secondary prevention (association)

A

association may either be causal or statistical: the association may be confounded

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

three ways of thinking about confounding

A

Classical approach, collapsibility approach, and counterfactual approach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

classical approach to confounding criteria for confounding

A

1) must be a risk factor for the disease independent form the study exposure
2) must be associated with the exposure under study in the source population
3) must not be a result of the exposure- not an intermediate variable in the causal pathway between the exposure and the disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

exceptions to the criteria for confounding under the classical approach

A

1)random statistical association due to sampling variability
2) marker of unmeasured confounder
3) confounder is an intermediate variable, but question is whether other causal pathways exist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Collapsibility approach to confounding criteria

A

the effect measure is homogenous across the strata defined by the confounder
collapsibility is the equality of stratum-specific measures of effect with the crude, unstratified measure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

counterfactual model approach to confounding

A

theoretical approach for defining the ideal comparison group; considers what the risk of the outcome would have been in the same exposed individuals if exposure had been absent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

restriction (to control for confounding in design stage)

A

confounding cannot occur if the distribution of the potential confounding factors do not vary across exposure or disease categories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

matching (to control for confounding in design stage)

A

selecting subjects according to the value of suspected confounder to ensure equal distribution among study groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

matching in cohort studies

A

matching unexposed to exposed without regard to disease status

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

matching in case-control status

A

matching non-diseases to diseased subjects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

control confounding in analysis stage

A

stratification; multivariable analysis; propensity scores; marginal structural models; direct acyclic graphs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

stratification

A

evaluating the association between exposure and disease within homogenous categories of the confounding variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

traditional multivariable analysis

A

can handle large numbers of confounders at once; based on statistical regression models; selection of potential confounders based on a prior knowledge, evaluation of data, and best judgment of the investigator, NOT on statistical significance

17
Q

conditional confounding

A

a presumed confounder may be cofounded by other variables

18
Q

residual confounding

A

adjustment does not completely remove the confounding effect due to a given variable or set of variables

19
Q

collinearity (confounding)

A

excessive correlation between confounder and exposure of interest

20
Q

biological interaction

A

co-participation in a causal mechanism of two or more component causes

21
Q

statistical interaction

A

effect modification: effect measure modification; heterogeneity of effects; subgroup effects and statistical interaction

22
Q

interaction- heterogeneity definition

A

the effect of risk factor (A) on the risk of an outcome (Y) varies according to the levels of a third variable (Z)

23
Q

interaction - statistical interaction/joint effects definition

A

the measure of association when both risk factors are present is different than what would be expected form combining their individual effects

24
Q

interaction (general knowledge)

A

reciprocity of interaction; goal is to identify and report

25
Q

additive interaction

A

absolute difference or attributable risk model (Cohort study ONLY)

26
Q

multiplicative interaction

A

relative difference or ratio model

27
Q

quantitative interaction

A

when the association between factor A and outcome Y exists and is of the same direction in each stratum formed by Z, but the strength of the association varies across strata

28
Q

Qualitative interaction

A

the effects of A on the outcome Y are in opposite directions according to eh presence of the third variable Z or when there is an association in one strata formed by Z but not in the other

29
Q

cumulative incidence

A

proportion of the population at risk that will develop an outcome in a given period of time (time is not part of calculation)

30
Q

incidence rate

A

rate at which new cases occur per unit of time (time is part of calculation)

31
Q

Attributable risk

A

how much of the disease in people who are exposed is due to the exposure
AR=CIe-CInoe)

32
Q

population attributable risk

A

how much of the disease in the population is due to the exposure
PAR=CItoalpop-CInoE

33
Q

cohort study requirements

A

1) cohort members must meet criteria for being at risk of the disease
2) subjects initially free of disease under study
3) subjects are classified by the exposure status
4) subjects are followed prospectively over time for incidence of disease
5) incidence of outcome is compared by exposure status
6) usual measured of association are ratios of incidence proportion or rates or SMRs, SIRs

34
Q

select comparison groups-cohort

A

unexposed, internal comparison, external comparisons

35
Q

counterfactual example definition

A

risk of disease in the exposed if they had never been exposed

36
Q

etiologically relevant time window (cohort)

A

period of time during which an exposure is capable of causing disease

37
Q

lag time

A

how soon after exposure would you expect to see the disease

38
Q

information bias in cohort study

A

misclassification of exposure at baseline; changes in exposure status over time; ascertainment of outcomes during follow-up

39
Q

immortal time bias

A

assignment of exposure during a time when the participant is considered ‘immortal’
among exposed, duration of exposure increases during follow-up