Quiz #1 (Slides 1-3) Flashcards

1
Q

What are some things that caused awareness in American for EA

A

In the 1960s, concern for the environment received a more public and global impetus as a result of population growth, urbanization, industrialization and the resultant pressures on natural resource

Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring (published in 1962) critiqued technology and the harmful effects it has on the environment and sustainabi

This new awareness continued throughout the sixties and eventually led to the evolution of the practice of Environmental Assessment and Managem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why was the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) signed?

A

The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) was signed into law in the US in 1970 as the result of a number of factors including public concern regarding the quality of the environment and the lack of environmental and social considerations in the decision making process for major project development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How did NEPA effect federal agencies

A

NEPA required federal agencies to integrate environmental values into their decision-making processes by considering the environmental impacts of their proposed actions and reasonable alternatives to those actions.

Required proponets to carry out environmental impact assessment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Impacts of NEPA

A

NEPA was the first environmental law that required Environmental Impact Statements (EISs) of proposed projects that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment.

EISs were intended to be the mechanism to change the way government decision making was conducted in the US

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did the United Nations World Commission on Enviromental Development say about sustainable development?

A

Sustainable development is: development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Impacts of U Conference (Earth Summit) 1992

A

Urged governments to rethink economic evelopment and stop destruction of planet

The Earth Summit resulted in the adoption of three major agreements (focused on changing traditional thoughts and approaches to development) and two legally binding Conventions (to prevent global climate change and the destruction of biological diversity (p. 10 chart for specifics)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is Agenda 21?

A

An agreement that resulted from Earth Summit, Set of principles providing guidance on achieving sustainable development.

It was global blueprint but not legelly binding.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Evolution of EA

A

Early on, EAs mainly focused on biophysical impacts of proposed projects (i.e. water and air quality, flora and fauna, climate and hydrology, etc.)

  • As the process matured, the range of aspects increased, and today social, health, and economic issues are also examined
  • The integration and linking of biophysical and socio-economic impacts does not occur everywhere, however, and to the same extent
  • In some countries, social impacts are only given limited consideration, while in others, the EA process is supplemented by social and health impact assessments, thereby limiting the extent of integration
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Current state of EA

A

Today, EA is applied in over 100 countries, by all development banks, and by most international aid agencies

  • Most funding agencies, from the World Bank through to the Asian Development Bank, require some form of environmental assessment of large projects to determine the possible adverse environmental impacts that may result from these projects
  • EA has also evolved substantially as a result of improvements in laws, procedures, and method
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

EA in Canada

A

In the late 1960s, Canada was under pressure to create EA legislation

•The government didn’t want to encourage litigation or have its decision making authority too constrained by courts

  • EIA was formally introduced in Canada in 1973 by the federal Environmental Assessment and Review Process (EARP)
  • Required federal departments and agencies to carry out EA for projects that might have significant effect
  • Implementation was left to discretion of authorities
  • Few departments effectively implemented EA provisions
  • No penalties for non-compliance, and as a result there was little to no compliance by proponents
  • EARP requirements were generally interpreted to be guidelines for development
  • A 1989 court decision (Rafferty-Alameda case) in Saskatchewan determined EARP “guidelines” to be mandatory requirements
  • This led to redrafting of EA legislation and in 1992, the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act was proclaimed as law to replace EARP and to strengthen EIA in Canada
  • The Act came into force in 1995
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why use EA?

A

To balance development and conservation.

With EA, a comprehensive assessment of the linkages and interactions among the issues under review can be conducted, along with the identification of the costs and benefits of development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Purpose of using EA

A
  • The main purposes of EA are to ensure that projects do not cause significant adverse environmental effects and to encourage actions that promotesustainable development
  • The EA process consists of both short-and long term goals and objective
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Short term goals of EA

A

The short-term goal of EA is to inform decision makers of the potentially significant environmental effects and risks associated with development proposals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Long term goals of EA

A

The long-term goal of EA is to promote sustainable development by ensuring that proposed projects do not undermine critical resources and ecological functions, or the well being, lifestyle, and livelihood of the communities and peoples who depend on them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Three principle of EA

A

The EA process is based on three core values, as identified by the International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA) and the Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment (IEMA):

  1. Integrity - the EA process should meet internationally accepted requirements and standards of practice
  2. Utility - the EA process should provide information that is sufficient and relevant for decision making
  3. Sustainability - the EA process should result in the implementation of environmental measures that are sufficient to avoid the irreversible loss of resource and ecosystem function, as well as mitigate serious adverse effects
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Name some principles of EA

A

Relevant, focused, efficient, practical, adaptive, credible, transparent

17
Q

Targets for good EA practice

A

-Screens out projects with unacceptable environmental risk

  • Allows the design of feasible projects to be modified in order to reduce their environmental impact
  • Identifies the best, practical environmental option
  • Predicts, with reasonable accuracy, the significant adverse effects of proposals

dentifies mitigation measures that successfully avoid, reduce and offset major impacts

  • Affects decision making, project approval and implementation of terms and conditions
  • Results in environmental benefits and gains relative to other option
18
Q

Stages of EA

A

Screening, scoping, EA Reporting, EA Report Review, Decision-making, Implemntation and follow up (monitoring, compliance, enforcement, auditing)

19
Q

Detail Stages of EA (what is needed)

A

A detailed description of the proposed project

  • A screening process to determine whether an EA is required
  • A baseline study to identify past, present and future conditions against which the effects of the project will be assessed
  • Identification and evaluation of potential project effects

Development of strategies to manage these effects

  • A technical and public review of the information generated
  • A decision as to whether the project should proceed and, if so, under what conditions
  • If the project is approved, monitoring and managing actual outcomes
  • Early involvement of the public, and the public’s sustained involvement throughout the process, is regarded as essential to good EIA
20
Q

Considerations of EA Process

A
  • What undertakings (i.e. projects/activities) will be subject to assessment?
  • What is the nature and scope of factors that must be addressed?
  • How will effective government and public review of the assessment findings be ensured?
  • How will results influence decision making on final design approval and implementation?
21
Q

Benefits of EA

A
  • The benefits of EA can be direct (e.g. improved project design or location) or indirect (e.g. raised environmental awareness of staff)
  • The benefits of EA generally include:
  • Better environmental and human health protection
  • Improved environmental planning and project design
  • Better compliance with environmental standards
  • Increased project acceptance
  • Savings in capital and operating costs that can arise if impacts are unanticipated
  • Reduced time and cost associated with gaining approv
22
Q

“Downsides” of EA

A
  • EA costs can be expressed both monetarily, as well as in terms of project schedule or time
  • Determining the cost of an EA can be difficult, as major projects typically require a large number of investigations and subsequent reporting
  • Many proponents complain that EA can cause excessive delays in project scheduling
  • Many of these delays, however, result from a poor understanding of the EA process and associated permitting requirements, as well as poor administration of the process
23
Q

How to maximize benefits of EA

A

•An open and transparent EA process, including opportunities for public participation (particularly from those who will be affected by the development) generally provides the maximum benefit of EA while minimizing associated monetary and scheduling costs

24
Q

Limitations of EA

A

Time delays, costs, public conserns over quality control and enforcement, lack of follow-up

25
Q

What is Environmental Assessment

A

Environmental assessment can be defined as identifying, estimating, and evaluating the environmental impacts of existing and proposed projects by conducting environmental studies to mitigate the relevant negative effects prior to making decisions and commitments

OR

EA is a systematic approach used to identify, predict, and evaluate the environmental (including societal, cultural, and health) effects of proposed projects or action

OR

A planning and decision making tool that can help countries work towards more sustainable development, a concept that is constantly evolving

26
Q

What is sustainable development

A

“development that meets the needs of today’s generation without compromising those of future generation”

27
Q

The Environmental Assessment Act (BC) 2018

A

Three objectives:

  1. Enhance public confidence and meaningful participation
  2. Advance reconciliation by implementing standards set out in UNDRIP, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission to Call to Actions, and the Tsilhqot’in decision in context of EA
  3. Protect the enviroment while offering clear path to sustainable project development
28
Q

Regulations within the Act

A
  • Responsible Minister Order
  • Reviewable Projects Regulation
  • Reviewable Projects Transition Regulation
  • Environmental Assessment Transition Regulation
  • Violation Ticket Administration and Fines Regulation
  • Environmental Assessment Fees Regulation
  • Conservation Officer Service Authority Regulation
  • Natural Resource Officer Authority Regulation
  • Protected Areas Regulation
  • Administrative Penalties Regulation
  • Regulations in development
29
Q

Phases of EA process in BC with their timelines

A

Phase 1 - Early Engagement (90 days legislated, IN 80 days to respond)
Phase 2 - EA Readiness Decision (no timeline)
Phase 3 - Process Planning (120 days w/ min. 30 day public comment period)
Phase 4 - Application Development and Review (up to 3 years for proponent to make draft, 180 days for review after draft submission w/ min. 30 day public comment)
Phase 5 - Effects Assessment (150 days combined with phase 6)
Phase 6 - Recommendation
Phase 7 - Decision (30 days)
Phase 8 - Post Certificate (will specify project deadline)

30
Q

BC EA Summary Timeline

also study word document

A
  1. Proponent submits initial project description and engagement plan to EAO
  2. EAO reviews documents within 10 days
  3. Early engagement phase begins with EAO approval of IPD and EP
  4. EAO holds minimum 30-daypublic comment period
  5. Indigenous Nations who wish to be participating Indigenous Nations must provide notice of intent by Day 80of Early Engagement
  6. EAO provides the proponent with the EAO Summary of Engagement within 90 days
  7. Technical Advisory Committee is formed by EAO on Day 90
  8. After receiving the EAO’s Summary of Engagement, the proponent has 1 year to submit their Detailed Project Description (EAO can terminate assessment after 1 year)
  9. After the final DPD has been filed, the EAO will make the Readiness Decision
  10. Process Planning phase begins when a decision to proceed to an EA is made – the EAO has 120 daysto develop the Process Order
  11. Minimum 30-daypublic comment period on draft Process Order
  12. Proponent develops draft Application based on Process Order within 3 years
  13. Following submission of draft Application, EAO has 180 days to review
  14. Minimum 30-daypublic comment period on draft Application
  15. Proponent has 1 year to submit the final Application following notice from EAO to produce the application
  16. EAO has 150 days to complete a draft Effects Assessment following submission of final Application
  17. Minimum 30-daypublic comment period on draft Effects Assessment
  18. Once Ministers receive referral package from EAO, they have 30 days to make a decision on whether to issue a certificate
  19. If a certificate is issued, project proponents must meet the deadline specified in the certificate (up to 10 years) for the project to have been substantially started
31
Q

What are the 5 pillars in EA in BC

A

Enviromnent, health, culture, social, economy

32
Q

Who overseas of EA process in BC

A

Chief Executive Assessment Officer (CEAO)

33
Q

What is EPIC

A

EAO’s Project Informaton Centre.
Online public database providing information ad documents, allows the public to submit comments during periods, and keeps all interested parties up to date

34
Q

What is the Responsible Minister Order Regulation (BC)

A

That two provincial Ministers are responsible for deciding whether or not to issue and EA certificate for a project to move forward

  1. Minister of Environment and Climate Change Strategy
  2. The “responsible minister” who is the Minister, through their Cabinet position, with responsibility for activities in a sector

•Designated alternate Minister is for situations where the proposed project proponent is a government agency where the responsible Minister is in charge
p. 9 in slide 3 for departments and ministers

35
Q

What is the Reviewable Projects Regulation (BC)

A
  • Sets the criteria that determine what projects are required to undergo an environmental assessment
  • Defines project categories and thresholds (triggers) associated with potential adverse effects
  • Reviewable projects fall into a prescribed category and meet or exceed thresholds defined in that category
  • Reviewable projects can include new projects, modification of existing projects, and decommissioning existing projec