Quiz 1 Flashcards
Frege
Depressed
Russel
Pipe
Whitehead
Self explanatory
Whether a statement is ACTUALLY T/F
Truth Value
Argument
set of statements for which the premises are supposed to support/give reason for the remaining statement, the conclusion
Premise indicators
As, since, for, because, given that, for the reason that, in as much as
Conclusion Indicators
Therefore, hence, thus, so, we may infer, consequently, it follows that
Valid
not possible to use the same form and for all premises to be true and conclusion to be false.
Doesn’t matter about the arguments: look at the FORM
Counterargument
All true premises and a false conclusion
Cogency (inductive reasonsing)
Inductively strong and all premises are true
Increase strength of argument
larger sample size, narrow conclusion, more relevant similarities, fewer relevant dissimilarities
Abduction
type of inductive, also explains truth of premises
inference to best explanation
Smallest argument
1 premise 1 conclusion
Tautologies
logically true, not possible to be false
Self-contradictions
logically false, can’t be true