Exam 1 Flashcards

1
Q

Argument

A

Has premises and conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Valid argument

A

not possible for premises to be true and conclusion to be false

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Inductive strength

A

indication of how well premise supports conclusion. Matter of evidence, not form

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Can a valid argument have a false conclusion?

A

Yes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Argument with inconsistent premises are

A

Valid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Simple sentence

A

1 subject, 1 predicate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Truth Functional compound sentence

A

truth value is determined by value of simple sentences that make up the compound sentence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Biconditional Truth Table: Which are True?

A

TT and FF

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Single Arrow Truth Table: Which are False?

A

T to F

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Neither Nor

A

—| (A v B)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Both And

A

—| (A ^ B)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does it mean if truth value is a model for sentence S?

A

If sentence is always true on that tva.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Truth functionally true sentence

A

always true regardless of the combination of truth values assigned to its components. True on every tva.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Truth Functionally consistent

A

A least 1 truth value assignment on which all members of a sentence are true (1 row on truth table)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Truth Functionally Equivalent

A

no tva on which their truth values differ. In other words, for two sentences P and Q, they are models of each other.

Example: For truth table A, B, A v B, B v A, always have same values

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Truth functionally false

A

False on every truth value assignment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Truth functionally contingent

A

TVA of sentence depends on value of components

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Truth functionally consistent

A

1 row for which all sentences in set are true. Note: does NOT have to be simple sentences

19
Q

Sound argument

A

If argument is valid AND all premises are true

20
Q

Counterexample

A

all T premises and F conclusion

21
Q

Logical true/tautology

A

not possible to be false

22
Q

Logically false

A

not possible for statement to be true “self contradiction”

23
Q

Logically equivalent

A

same truth value, not possible fore them to have different truth values

24
Q

Logically contradictory

A

only if not possible for statements to have same truth value

25
Q

Logically consistent vs. inconsistent:

A

Is it possible fore all statements in set to be true?

26
Q

X if Y

A

Y –> X (opposite of if then)

27
Q

Whenever/Given/Assuming X, Y

A

X –> Y

28
Q

X is SUFFICIENT for Y

A

X –> Y

29
Q

X only if Y

A

X –> Y

30
Q

X is NECESSARY for Y

A

Y –> X (opposite)

31
Q

If then
Only if
Whenever/Given/Assuming
Is sufficient for

A

X –> Y

32
Q

if

is necessary for

A

Y –> X

33
Q

X UNLESS Y
or
X if not Y

A

–| Y –> X

34
Q

If and only if

A

biconditional

35
Q

if X then Y AND if Y then X

A

biconditional

36
Q

__ just in case ___

A

biconditional

37
Q

Truth functionally Satisfiable

A

sentence that is true on @ least 1 tva

truth functionally true or contingent

38
Q

Truth functionally falsifiable

A

sentence that is false on at least 1 tva.

truth functionally false or contingent

39
Q

Truth functionally contradictory

A

sentences always have a different truth value

40
Q

Truth functionally INconsistent

A

no row for which all true at once

41
Q

Can it be consistent and contradictory?

A

NO

42
Q

Can it be equivalent but inconsistent?

A

Yes, if always False

43
Q

Truth functionally valid

A

argument with no tva all premise true and conclusion false

44
Q

Inconsistence PREMISES

A

at least 1 false premise