Quiz 1 Flashcards
aging is universal
- one of our major goals is to get old
- all of us are aging
Gerontological explosion
older adults are living longer, the population is growing
they have more active lifestyles and more are in the workforce
pockets of preservation
performance is preserved over age for World Knowledge
hidden upsides of aging
what older adults are better at than young adults
successful aging
varies across individuals, time, and situations
- meaningful, joyful, healthy
selective optimization and compensation
- change what we do to fit our abilities
- select activities and goals we wish to achieve, optimize the time and abilities we have to achieve these goals, and compensate for any declines or deficiencies that may result from aging
- a trick to successful aging
socioemotional selectivity theory
- our goals shift as we age from a focus on accumulating knowledge to emotionally meaningful goals
- driven by a limited perspective
value-directed remembering
as we age, we get more selective about what we value and prioritize that
subjective age
- what age you feel like
- a positive attitude, associated with health, cognition, strength, and longevity
brain reserve hypothesis
brain reserve may function as a moderator on the relationship between brain damage and cognitive outcome
ways to boost cognitive reserve
- genetic influences
- socio-economic status
- intelligence
- educational attainment
- social engagement
- sleep
- cognitive stimulation
- healthy lifestyle
nun study
- the nuns had biological signs of aging (atrophy, plaques and tangles) but showed normal cognition
- cognitive reserve was a protective factor, active lifestyle prevented cognitive decline
cognitive training (pros and cons)
Pros: boosts cognition
Cons: does not generalize to other activities or daily life; no more beneficial than “real-world” cognitive activities
Pros and cons of animal research in aging
Pros: great for studying neural mechanisms, reduces variables and confounds
Cons: ethical concerns, still expensive, human aging has unique attributes, cognitive functions are difficult to measure in animals
pros and cons of behavioral research
Pros: cheap and easy, non invasive, can answer most questions about cognition
Cons: can only infer effects of neural structure and function
longitudinal study design (pros and cons)
Pros: control for individual differences and cohort effects
Cons: takes 50+ years to run an aging study, retest effects, attrition
cross-sectional study design (pros and cons)
Pros: faster to run, no attrition, no practice effects
Cons: individual differences, cohort effects
cohort effects
generational differences; differences that occur due to one’s membership in a group
attrition
people leaving a study
practice effects
changes in score due to having taken the test before
cross sectional does not equal longitudinal: implications for research
cohort effects can be mistaken for aging effects and vice versa
cohort-sequential studies
design that combines cross-sectional and longitudinal elements by following two or more age groups over time
Twice-minus-once-tested method and
Quasi-longitudinal method
Trying to predict what follow up scores would be without practice effects
Correlation does not equal causation (why this is a particular problem for aging research and how to get around it)
- it is impossible to manipulate age so the research is always correlational
- we can conduct studies that turn young adults into old adults by manipulating resources; ensure there are no plausible alternative explanations for the relationship; be careful with wording
selection bias
-self selection: contacted by adults who live independently, active in community and see ads, interested in psychology research, concerned about their cognitive declines, healthy and able to travel
- our selection: exclude poor cognitive performers, recent cardiovascular events or head trauma, are non-native English speakers
identification as “older adult”
where does old age begin? No distinct line
age as a continuous variable (linear vs non linear effects of age)
do dependent variables have inflection points or change linearly over time
Pros and cons of structural neuroimaging studies
Pros: directly measure neural structure, can be used to examine brain-behavior connections, relatively non invasive
Cons: very expensive (time and $), lots of contraindications for fMRI means more selective sample, correlational
gray matter
neuronal cell bodies
white matter
connections between brain regions
Structural magnetic resonance imaging - how does it work
aligns water molecules in brain and sends pulses to disrupt this alignment; measures the different speeds or rebounding
Structural magnetic resonance imaging - what is measured
gray matter