Questions - Useful Factors - Italy Flashcards
‘The 1848-49 revolutions in Italy resulted in complete failure’ How far do you agree with this statement?
Consider short term vs long term for each factor
1. Piedmont
2. Clear long-term path to unification
3. Failed revolutionary action (Roman republic/Venetian republic)
How far do you agree that the process of Italian Unification, in the years 1859-70 resulted in the creation of an enlarged Piedmont rather than a united Italy?
- Enlarged Piedmont
- Social division and Brigands War
- Unified Italy
‘The Roman republic was so short lived because of a lack of strong leadership’ How far do you agree with this statement?
- Lack of strong leadership
- Strength of foreign powers
- Weakness of revolutions and lack of popular support
‘In the years 1862-70, the obstacles to Italian unity that remained after the creation of the Kingdom of Italy were mainly overcome’. How far do you agree with this statement?
- Venetia and Rome
- Political disunity
- National cohesion
- Continued social and economic problems
How far do you agree that Piedmont was in a better condition to lead Italy towards unification in 1858 than in 1848?
- Leadership
- Economic and military strength
- Foreign powers
How accurate is it to say that the military strength of Austria was the decisive factor in explaining the failure of the 1848-49 revolutions in Italy?
- Austrian strength
- Role of the Papacy
- Piedmontese weaknesses
- Revolutionary weaknesses
How far do you agree that the main reason for the failure of both the 1830-32 and 1848-49 revolutions in Italy was a lack of popular support?
Two timescale discussion = comparison
1. Lack of popular support
2. Foreign involvement
3. Weaknesses of revolutionaries
How far do you agree that the strength of Austrian opposition to Italian unification was the principal reason for the slow progress made in the years 1830-48?
- Austrian strength
- Economic and Social divides within Italy
- Weaknesses of Italian nationalism
‘Cavour was the driving force behind the events leading to the outbreak of the second Italian war of Independence (1859)’. How far do you agree with this statement?
- Cavour
- VE II
- Nap III
How accurate is it to say that in the years 1848-67, Garibaldi was more often a failure than a success in his attempts to unify Italy?
Judgments run throughout – long/short term, political/social/economic, real vs legal Italy
1. Failure of 1848-49
2. Uniting the north and south
3. Venetian question
4. Roman question
‘Garibaldi’s contribution to the unification of Italy was outweighed by the problems that he created’. How far do you agree with this statement?
Judgments run throughout – long/short term, political/social/economic, real vs legal Italy
1. Failure of 1848-49
2. Uniting the north and south
3. Venetian question
4. Roman question
How far do you agree that Mazzini and his nationalist supporters achieved very little in the years 1830-56?
Time-based approach
1. Failures 1830-47
2. Successes 1830-47
3. Failures 1847-56
4. Successes 1847-56
‘Cavour had only a limited influence over the process of Italian Unification in the years 1856-61’. How far do you agree with this statement?
- Cavour
- VE II
- Nap III
- Garibaldi
How accurate is it to say that it was mainly the role of Italians themselves that shaped Italian unification in the years 1858-70?
Two-factor approach
Italians:
1. Cavour
2. Garibaldi
3. VE II
Foreign Powers:
1. France
2. Austria
‘In the years 1849-70 VE II played a symbolic role, rather than a leading role in the process of Italian Unification’. How far do you agree with this statement?
- Strengthening of Piedmont
- 2nd War of Independence
- Roman Question
- Venetian Question