questionnaires Flashcards
practical strength - time and money
quick and cheap method of gathering large amounts of data from many people
practical strength - easy to analyse
tend to be made up of closed ended questions and gather quantitative data - easy and quick to analyse
ethical strength - informed consent
IC easy to gain as by completing and returning the Q, respondents agree to be part of research
ethical strength - anonymity and confidentiality
Qs dont ask respondents for name and gathered info is presented as statistics so identity of respondents is kept hidden
theoretical strength - reliability
Qs are standardised so respondents are asked same questions in same order with same choices of responses - method is easy to replicate
theoretical strength - objectivity
positivists favour Qs as they enable researcher to stay objective - not personally involved with respondents
practical limitation - low response rate
postal Qs in particular have very low response rate - as researcher not present, PPs dont feel obliged to complete it so treat it as junk mail
practical limitation - money
to encourage PPs to take part in research, researchers may have to offer incentives such as entry into a prize draw - adds to cost of research
theoretical limitation - lack of validity
interpretivists - lack of contact between researcher and PPs means researcher can’t gain full understanding of meanings people attach to behaviour + PPs may misunderstand questions and researcher is not there to explain - invalid answers
theoretical limitation - unrepresentative data
low response rate so data is likely to be unrepresentative + questionnaires may not have been answered by target population