Qualitative research Flashcards
What are the strengths of a qualitative research?
- Focus on the ‘real world’ and real patients
- high level of detail and context - links between pts and interviewees means that the results are generalisable
- can capture experiences and help understand how people behave - v important for health behaviours
What are the weaknesses of a qualitative research?
- Methods to reduce bias rely on researchers themselves (loss of auditability - need to trust researchers) - this leads to bias which is hard to reduce as the interviewers may have their own bias. HOWEVER it does mean that the research is more flexible and context-based
- Cannot predict (but can suggest) causations and outcomes
- Generalisable only with caution (not supposed to be generalisable but a valid representation of a specific context) - the reader must decide if it is more widely applicable and this requires a judgement call
How is a qualitative research study done?
- No pre-defined hypotheses
- Repeating cycles of data collection and analysis until a stage where sampling more participants will be unlikely to add substantially to the development of themes or theory (Saturation) - DEDUCTIVE AND ITERATIVE METHOD
Advantages of focus groups in a qualitative study
- More ‘natural’ and more participant-centred format - more control over convo topics, able to bring up and discuss amongst themselves in own lang, identify topics that the researchers did not - opp. to heart others views, exchange ideas, clarify indiv understanding and attitudes - presence of opposing views can prompt further explanation of own views in greater depth
- The interactions between group members and how they discuss/ argue/ come to a consensus are as important as their answers
Disadvantages of focus groups
- Less good at capturing indiv’s thoughts/ feelings/ rationales behind their behaviours in depth
Advantages of interviews
- Allows an in-depth exploration of the topic with the participant. with opportunities to probe and ask additional questions
Disadvantages of interviews
- A v artificial situation and assumes the interviewee is articulate and comfortable with talking for a long time
What is purposive sampling?
- ’ a form of non-probability sampling in which researchers rely on their own judgment when choosing members of the population to participate in their surveys.’
- ‘a non-probability sample that is selected based on characteristics of a population and the objective of the study.’
- Want diff demographics to ensure range of perspectives
What is snowball sampling
non-probability sampling technique in which a researcher begins with a small population of known individuals and expands the sample by asking those initial participants to identify others that should participate in the study
Why use purposive sampling in qualitative studies?
- A non-random sampling approach
- Sample does not need to be representative as it is an exploratory study which aims to generate insights
- Purposive samples are groups of parts that are chosen because their perspectives are thought to be important to understand the study issue (usually has a variety of demographics and experiences of healthcare)
What is trustworthiness in qualitative studies and how can it be shown?
- Validity (can we trust the results?)
- Need to justify interpretation - clearly explain how conclusions reached
- Inclusion of quotations and other contextual materials to support the analysis
- Inv others to comment during analysis?
- Compare diff perspectives, e.g. HCPs and pts
What is credibility in qualitative studies and how can it be shown?
- Reliability (results not random?)
- Fair representation of data
- Make sure all data available analysed (no cherry picking)
- Use more than one coder to assure that the analysis is not one dimensional (dominated by one perspective)
What is reflexivity in qualitative studies and how can it be shown?
- Critical examination of researchers’ own role in the research (reflecting on how the interviewer may influence their own researcher either in the interview or in the analysis)
- Their professional bg, experience and personality influence the data
- Does not need to be a bias - but needs to be addressed
- Should critically examine their own role, potential bias and influence during:
1. Formulation of the research question
2. Data collection, including recruitment/ choice of location
3. Relationship with participants
What is relevance in a qualitative study and how can it be shown?
- Does it illuminate an important issue/ add knowledge/ potentially improve lives
- Explore important issue within social context
- Give voice to participants - those ‘rarely heard’
- Understanding of values and experiences especially where they are different from practitioners
- Helps to see healthcare as embedded in everyday life (especially in chronic illness)
- Influences clinical practice (by studies being read, e.g. in BMJ or guidelines)
What makes a good qualitative study?
- Not trying to identify/ prove/ predict
- Validity - can we trust the results
- Reliability (not random results)
- Reflexivity
- Relevance