From guidelines to shared decision making Flashcards
What does evidence based practice include?
- Best available evidence
- Dr.s own clinical expertise
- Pt’s ICE
What is the 5 step approach to EBP?
- Ask focused q’s - specific
- Find the most robust evidence to answer it - high quality
- Critical appraisal skills to review the evidence
- Apply the findings to the realities of clinical practice and needs of the individual pt
- Review the first 4 steps and consider changes for the next time (clinical audit)
When is EBM used in the context of clinical practice?
- Making a diagnosis
- Deciding on further investigations (which may alter the management)
- Deciding on treatment or manageent
- Addressing pts ICE (must be considered throughout all of EBM)
Examples of secondary sources
- Guidelines - NICE, SIGN, US national guidelines
- Evidence summaries - Clinical Evidence (BMJ), CKS (clinical knowledge summaries)
- SRs - Cochrane Library
How to search for best evidence?
Clinical guidelines (NHS evidence) -? Evidence summaries -> SRs of the evidence -> primary research lit in bibliographic databases (Medline) -> consider asking info specialist to help with search design
How do we critically appraise clinical guidelines?
For clinical guidelines we often use the AGREE II tool
What are the 4 issues in application of results into clinical practice?
- Define the popn - were the pts like yours
- Define the intervention - was it appropriate?
- Understand the strengths and limitations of study/ review : consider biases
- Interpret and apply to your patients - sample size, summary statistic used, probability or confidence of the result
What sorts of questions can be answered in an audit/ service evaluation?
- Did we follow guidelines?
- Did the pt comply?
- How did the pt feel about it
- How can we improve next time
What are the challenges of EBP for clinicians?
- Availability of relevant evidence (e.g. great deal of guidelines for MS are based on low quality evidence/ expert consensus)
- Time and ability to interpret evidence appropriately (Vast amount of evidence) - we need summaries and guidelines
- The translation of knowledge/ evidence into clinical practice - evidence is not the same as a clinical practice recommendation
What does I2 measure?
Measures the degree of inconsistency across primary studies in a meta-analysis that is not accountable by chance
- Used to QUANTIFY inconsistency across studies and assess the impact of heterogeneity on the meta-analysis
- Describes the % variability in effect estimates due to heterogeneity NOT chance
What might cause statistical heterogeneity (factors that influence the I2 value)?
- Clinical diff between studies (e.g. diffs in definition of ARM/ diabetes, diffs in treatment of diabetes, diffs in study popns - age, ethnicity, gender, diffs in severity of disease)
- Methodological diffs between studies - diffs in trial design, diffs in risk of bias in studies, diffs in methods for identifying disease
- Unknown study characteristics