QME Deck 2/2 Flashcards
Competency Exam
What factors are considered to determine a suitable impairment rating for a specific injury or illness?
A rating that takes into account all impairments, not only the primary body part or organ system impacted, but the full impact of the illness and injury and its treatment.
Why are physicians mandated by the Division of Workers’ Compensation (DWC) to use the AMA guidelines when evaluating impairments in injured workers?
To provide uniformity when calculating disability awards.
How is the term ‘strict rating’ defined in the context of impairment evaluation?
A strict rating refers to the textbook, standard and customary use of the AMA guides to determine an impairment rating.
If a QME identifies two different methods for calculating impairment for a specific injury, which one should be considered the most accurate for the report?
The method that gives the highest impairment rating is the most accurate rating.
In a Permanent and Stationary (P&S) report, what does the abbreviation WPI represent?
Whole person impairment. This is the same as permanent impairment.
What course of action should a QME take when an impairment is absent from the AMA guidelines?
Physicians are instructed to, “use clinical judgment, comparing measurable impairment resulting from the unlisted condition to measure impairment resulting from similar conditions with similar impairment.”
What term is used when a QME compares an unlisted impairment to a listed one for the purpose of rating?
Rating by analogy.
Which landmark case provided the legal foundation for using ‘rating by analogy’?
Almaraz-Guzman.
In the context of rating by analogy or an Almaraz-Guzman analysis, does the derived impairment rating need to align closely with the original strict rating?
No, the rating by analogy can provide a different impairment rating.
What criteria must be fulfilled when applying rating by analogy or conducting an Almaraz-Guzman analysis?
The QME must first calculate the strict rating. Then, an alternative impairment is calculated by analogy using an impairment value contained within a chapter of the AMA Guides. The more favorable rating is then the final rating.
Is a rating by analogy or an Almaraz-Guzman analysis required for every case that is deemed Permanent and Stationary?
No.
How does the AMA Guides define anatomic loss?
Damage to an organ system or body structure.
What is the definition of functional loss according to the AMA Guides?
A change (decrease) in function for the organ or body system.
What process was followed to establish the impairment criteria outlined in the AMA Guides?
Through scientific evidence, consensus of chapter authors, and medical specialty society recommendations.
How many chapters of the AMA Guides are available for a QME to reference when rating an injured worker’s impairments?
As many as necessary to accurately rate permanent impairment.
BONUS: When employing rating by analogy or an Almaraz-Guzman analysis, what four steps is a QME expected to follow?
Provide a strict rating per the AMA Guides.Explain why the strict rating does not accurately reflect the injured worker’s disability.Provide an alternate rating using the four corners of the AMA Guides.Explain why the alternate rating more accurately reflects the injured worker’s level of disability.
What aspects must a QME assess and rate when assigning an impairment rating for an illness or injury, such as cancer?
The QME must evaluate and report all impairments resulting from the illness or injury including effects from treatment (impairments from chemotherapy, impairments from radiation, impairments from mastectomy).
Is it appropriate for a QME to include subjective complaints when calculating impairment ratings?
Yes. The QME should collect a thorough history (subjective information) and perform a physical examination.
What is the process for a QME to convert an upper extremity impairment into a whole person impairment rating?
Multiple the upper extremity impairment by 0.6 (memory aid: hands are worth more than feet).
What method does a QME use to translate a lower extremity impairment into a whole person impairment?
Multiple the lower extremity impairment by 0.4 (memory aid: hands are worth more than feet).
In the case of a worker who contracted HIV through their job, how should impairment be calculated once their HIV is well-controlled and they have reached maximum medical improvement?
This is a trick question. The QME should not assign impairment simply because of a diagnosis or a disease. There has to be impairment. In this case, whole person impairment would be 0%.
For a worker with well-managed diabetes who has reached maximum medical improvement, what is the process for calculating impairment?
This is a trick question. The QME should not assign impairment simply because of a diagnosis or a disease. There has to be impairment.
What was the purpose behind the development of the combined values chart in the AMA Guides?
So that multiple impairment calculations do not exceed 100% whole person impairment.
If a worker has impairments affecting the right hand, left knee, and cervical spine, how should the QME calculate the total whole person impairment?
The QME should use the Combine Values Chart on page 604 of the AMA Guides.