QKA 2 Unit 6 Top Heavy & Key Ees Flashcards
In 1982 Congress passed which act that applies top-heavy testing to Retirement Plan’s
TEFRA: Tax, equity and fiscal, responsibility act
Top-heavy rules are found in what section of the internal revenue code?
IRC 416
Failure to comply with top heavy rules. May do want to a plan?
Cause disqualification
To make the determination of whether a Plan is top heavy or not; what seven steps should a plan administrator Identify?
1) employer for the plan
2) determination date
3) Employee Groups
4) plan being tested
5) Account balances for all included EEs
6) calculate Key Balances
7) does it pass?
All of the top-heavy determinations, including if an employee is a key employee, what account balances are reviewed, are based off of data from the…
Determination Period
The determination date is what?
The last day of the determination period
The farmer company establishes a 401(k) on January 1, 2022. The determination date for the first plan year is what? The determination date for the second plan year is what?
12/31/2022 & 12/31/2022
What is the limit on how many officers may be considered to be key employees in any given year?
The maximum is the greater of:
10% of the number of employees.
Three.
To a limit of 50.
What is the cap in terms of how many employees can be considered officers for a company even if the 10% cap is greater?
Numerically the most employees that can be considered officers is 50
If there are more officers than the maximum number permitted, then how do you determine which officers to include?
Rank the officers by compensation.
The highest paid up to the number includable are the key employees.
If an employee already satisfies a key definition based on ownership, does that preclude them from being considered an officer of the company?
No, it does not
Treasury regulations indicate that an officer is someone who does what?
Is an administrative executive in regular and continued service with the employer.
An employer can bypass having an employee set up as an officer by not providing that employee with an executive title, even though they wield a great deal of administrative power. True or false?
False someone with no title, who fulfills the role of an administrative executive would be an officer if they meet the compensation test as well
What compensation is used for the purposes of determining the threshold of the officer test?
415 as defined by the plan
What are the three prescribe definitions of 415 compensation for the determination of key employees?
Current includable compensation,
W-2 compensation
Compensation for FICA withholding purposes
If a required aggregation groups, top-heavy ratio exceeds 60% then what happens to every plan inside of the aggregation group?
Every single plan whether it would pass if it was tested independently or not is then considered top-heavy?
In a testing environment where a client has multiple plans, the required aggregation group consists of Plans that:
Each plan in which at least one key employee participates
Any other plan that enables the plan with the key employee to satisfy no discrimination testing or coverage testing
A law partnership sponsors, two 401(k) plans, one that covers the partners and staff in the other, which covers associate attorneys. None of the associates as an officer. The plans separately meet coverage and nondiscrimination testing. Because none of the associates as a key employee what happens?
The two plans are not part of a required aggregation group and may be tested separately for top-heavy purposes
A doctors office offers two separate 401(k) plans, one that covers the doctors and the second plan covers office staff. If one of the employees in the office staff becomes a doctor in a partner in the practice and fails to move to the doctors plan. What happens?
At that point because there is a key employee inside of the staff 401(k) plan, both plans are tested together for aggregate testing
From the perspective of 5500 filing, what is the definition of a participant?
An individual is considered a participant if he or she is an employee who is or may become eligible to receive a benefit of any type from an employer 401(k)
Employees who were disaggregated for ADP or ACP testing can be disaggregated for top-heavy testing as well, true or false?
False, even though otherwise excludable employees are disaggregated for other non-discrimination testing, the top-heavy testing determines based off of the plans actual eligibility
If a company offers in ESOP and a 401(k) and key employees participate in both. Are they aggregated for top-heavy testing?
Even though ESOPs are typically tested by themselves if a 401(k) is present and key employees are participating in both they are tested together
Why would a company want to make use of permissive aggregation with relationship to top-heavy testing if that company had other plans?
It could help to reduce the top-heavy ratio