Q9 essay Flashcards
principles
retrospective liability
maximum certainty
correspndence rule
fair labelling
retrospective liability
1.when a law passes applies to some time in the past
2.it could change so could be lawful at time of commitment but then change to unlawful at some point in future
case for retrospective liability
RvR
remove exemption of marital rape at time was committed wouldn’t be liable but now is.This would be seen as justified as was so offensive to the common sense of morality
maximum certainty
law needs to be as precise and clear as possible
people understand what the law is which enables them to modify their behaviour to ensure it complies making society safer
example of maximum certainty
s.20 gbh but extends to psychiatric harm
how to improve maximum certainty
modernisation
codification
proposals to improve made by law commission
correspondence rule
actus Reus and men’s rea should be of the same level
importance of correspondence rule
if offence is constructive liability(correspondence doesnt apply) defendant liable for harm they may not have foreseen and this means they lack fault so it is unjust
example of correspondence rule
s18 GBH
actus Reus-d must have caused really serious harm
men’s rea-must intend really serious harm
fair labelling
name of offence ought to accurately describe the offence. Sentence should align with the label
importance of fair labelling
defendant unfairly stigmatised with a label that is more serious than it is
undermines faith in justice as makes system unduly lenient