Pychiatric Injury Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

I

A

The c may be able to claim for psychiatric injury as she suffered psychological damage as opposed to physical or property damage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

D

A

There are two stages to prove

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

E

A

Firstly the claimant must be suffering from a recognized psychiatric injury as opposed to ordinary human emotions (Reilly v merseyside health authority)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

E

A

The claimant must also show that this illness was caused by a traumatic event or an assault on the senses (sion v Hempstead health authority)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

A

A

Apply to scenario
Was the c suffering from a recognised psychiatric injury
Also what caused this

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

E

A

Secondly it must be determined if the claimant is a primary victim or secondary victim . A primary victim is a person who reasonably fears for their own physical safety or is within the zone of danger . Page v smith

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

E

A

A secondary victim is an unwilling witness to the traumatic incident in question but is not personally in danger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

A

A

Apply which one it applies to

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

E

A

Secondary victims must fall under the criteria established in Alcock v chief constabke of South Yorkshire for a claim for psychiatric injury is allowed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

1) Love

A

Firstly you must have close ties of love and affection with the primary victim which covers close family relationships as well as close friendships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Apply

A

Was there a relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

2) Witness

A

Secondly you must witness the accident or it’s immediate aftermath with your own unaided senses in Mcloughlin v o’brian it was held that immediate aftermath can mean seeing the primary victim in their immediate post accident state and not cleaned up

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Apply

A

Apply is they witnessed it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

3)

A

Thirdly the claimant must have directly perceived the accident or its immediate aftermath

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Apply

A

Apply to the scenario

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

4)

A

Finally there must be a connection between witnessing the event or the injury suffered

17
Q

Apply

A

Apply

18
Q

Conclusion

A