Pure Economic Loss Flashcards
Hedley Bryne v Heller
Outlined 5 part test for Pure Economic Loss
Chaudrhy v Prabhakar
Skill/ Expertise
Reasonable Reliance
“Defendant must have expertise in relevant area or have information available to them”
Lennon v MPC
Skill/ Expertise
Failed as gave wrong expertise to claimant
Patchett v SPATA
Voluntarily assumes responsibility
Is not liable for negligent misstatement if not clear that they did not intend to assume responsibility
Caparo v Dickman
Known User
Known Purpose
“Only liable if they were aware of the person or class of people”
“Not wear of the purpose of the information”
Morgan Crucible v Hill
Known User
Knew about user and gave wrong information
Law society v KPMG
Known Purpose
“Known or should be aware on what the information would be used for”
They were aware but chose to ignore it
Smith v Eric S Bush
Reasonable Reliance
“Must demonstrate it was reasonable to rely on the information at the given time”
Spartan Steel
Can only claim for economic loss if it has a physical loss aswell
Barnett v Chelsea
Causation: But for test
Wagon Mound
Causation: Remoteness of damage
Blyth v BHam Waterworks
Breach: falling below standards of a reasonable man