Occupiers Liability Act (OLA) 1957

Question 1

Jolley v Sutton

Answer 1

Allurement: children can be lured

Question 2

Lowrey v Walker

Answer 2

Implied Permission: Repeated Visits

Question 3

Moloney v Lambeth

Answer 3

S.2.(3).(a)

Children: DOC

Question 4

OLA 57 s.2(1)

Answer 4

Nature of duty

Question 5

OLA 57 s.2(2)

Answer 5

Standard of duty

Question 6

OLA 57 s.2(4)(a)

Answer 6

Warnings: able to discharge duty

Question 7

OLA 57 s.2(4)(b)

Answer 7

Independent Contractor: able to discharge duty

Question 8

OLA 57 s.2(3)(b)

Answer 8

Specialist Visitor: DOC should be lower

Question 9

OLA 57 s.2(5)

Answer 9

Consent: they have given consent freely

Question 10

OLA 57 s.2(3)(a)

Answer 10

Children: DOC should be greater

Question 11

Phipps v Rochester

Answer 11

S.2.(3).(a)

Prudent parent test: younger the child, higher DOC

Question 12

Roles v Nathan

2

Answer 12

S.2.(3).(b)
Specialist Visitor: should be aware of current danger
S.2.(4).(a)
Warnings: can be verbal

Question 13

Wheat v Lacon

Answer 13

S.1.(3).(a) OLA 57

Occupier: Sufficent control test

Question 14

Wheeler v Copas

Answer 14

S.1.(3).(a) OLA 57

Premises: any temporary or permanent object

Question 15

Woodward v Mayor of Hastings

Answer 15

S.2.(4).(b)

Specialist Contractor: if the work can be checked, should be checked

Question 16

Brannon v Airtours

Answer 16

Contributory Negligence: caused more damage voluntarily

Question 17

OLA 1957

Answer 17

Applies to lawful visitors

Question 18

Haseldine v Daw

Answer 18

S.2.(4).(b)

Independent Contractor: worl can’t be checked