Public Participation & Indigenous Engagement Flashcards
why is it needed, levels of involvement, engaging with local knowledge
Why do we need to have public participation?
- define problem effectively
-wider range of knowledge and info
-identify socially acceptable solutions
-more balanced decision making
-minimize conflict and delays
-facilitate implementation
-reduce the possibility of legal challenge
-promote social learning
When in the IAA process in public participation encouraged
- starts before the formal IA begins
- Early planning phase with a public participation plan
-the Agency publicly posts decisions made on the Impact Assessment Registry of
Canada
how is public participation supported financially
It is supported with funding made available through the Agency’s Participant Funding Program.
What is the Impact Assessment Registry of Canada
DESIGNED TO:
-increase knowledge of bth parties
-build relationships
-prioritize the participation of those who are most affected by the project
-allow opinions
-influences decision-making
-participants see how their input was considered
Levels of involvement to public participation
-mere ‘rubber stamp committees’ to full citizen control
-spectrum of levels to involvement
requirements to public participation
-adequate notice
-access to info
-public comment
-public hearings
-participation funding
Aboriginal consultation and engagement
-rights under Canadian constitution
-UNDRIP rights
-Duty to Consult based on Haida Nation v. BC
-new IAA requires increased Indigenous consultation
Integration of Indigenous Local Knowledge is Canadian EIA policy requirement, what is the benefit to ILK
-improve communication an trust b/w gov & Indg communities
-create better overall environmental understanding
-recognizes different knowledge forms
give an example of sharing Indigenous Knowledge
Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board is a Good
example
-considered environmental and social impacts of the Pipeline to nearby Indigenous communities
Woodfibre LNG and Squamish Nation example of Indigenous consultation
Conditional approval of the Woodfibre LNG project.
Consulting lady has insight into federal proponent and FN perspective on the EA
2 year process designed and approved by Squamish nations, met and reviewed proposed project, did their own impact assessment
outcome= confidence from their Nation in the project, led their gov issuing and EA certificate
If commitments are implemented, they will be involved in the management of the project and assurance to protect their values
BC’s EA Revitalization
- concerns were being raised by Indg communities about the EA process
-4 regional workshops that represented 16 FN were represented, 2 province wide forums, and direct engagement with 67 FN groups
-3 goals: enhance public confidence advance reconciliation, make clear pathways to sustainable project approvals
-new early engagement stage, seeking consensus of developments and recommendation on decision if project should proceed or not