Public Nuisance (includes Rylands v Fletcher) Flashcards

1
Q

What are the 3 elements?

A

1- There is a PN

2- Class of P’s so widespread/indiscriminate in effect that it would be unreasonable to expect 1 P to take proceeds and instead it should be taken on by the community at large
(PYA Quarries)

3- Nuisance foreseeable consequence of D’s conduct (Wagonmound)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who are the 2 ‘people that can sue for PN?

A

1- AG

2- Private individual suffering special damages above public generally (Esso)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the DEFENCES?

A

1- Statutory Authority (Allen)

2- Act of God (Sedleigh)

3- Consent (Sturgess)

4- Outside trespasser (Sedleigh)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the REMEDIES?

A

1- Injunction to reduce level/time to balance social interests of D’s activity (DEFAULT) (Esso)

2 - Damages, if the injury is: small, can be estimated, can be adequately compensated by small payment, if oppressive to grant an injunction (Sheffer)

3- Court orders (BNZ order to pay for blinds)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

RYLANDS V FLETCHER

What are the 4 elements?

A

1- Collection of something likely to give rise to exceptionally high risk of danger/mischief should there be an escape (Transco)

2- Mischief ESCAPES which causes damage (Lyons) no escape if stays on D’s property

3- Non-ordinary use of land

4- Damage caused by escape foreseeable. Method of escape does not have to be foreseeable. STRICT LIABILITY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Element 3

How is non-ordinary use of land determined?

A

1- Special use bringing increased danger. Contextual on time,/season, war/burnoff in summer. (Rickards)

2- Storage of chemicals (Cambridge)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Element 3

What are the defences to Non-Ordinary Use of Land?

A

1- Mischief is not non-natural (Easton)

2- Required by statute but done with due care (Transco)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Element 4

How is the foreseeability of the damage by the ESCAPE determined?

A

STRICT LIABILITY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the 2 DEFENCES?

A

1- Act of God

2- 3rd Party interference without knowledge (Lothian)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the REMEDY?

A

1- Compensatory damage for injury to land

PLUS P’ reasonable costs of prevention (NZ Forest)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly