Public Health Flashcards
What is the benefit of case controls?
Good for rare exposures
Good for rare outcomes
Can prove causation
Good for rare outcomes
89/100,000 got flu over winter. What is this measuring?
Incidence ‘over winter’ so over time.
People in a study were given atorvastatin. cos 13.4% had cardiovascular events in the control group and 9.4% in the treatment group. What does 13.4 - 9.4 give us?
Relative risk
Odds ratio
Absolute risk reduction
Number to treat
Absolute risk reduction
PPIs given as RCT for functional dyspepsia. Showed a stat sig difference for crude RR. BUT then adjusted for age and shit, RR no longer stat sig. What was the problem with crude RR?
Confounding factors
Study looking at hospital and census data for rheumatic fever, seeing what decile they were and calculating ARF incidence rates
Retrospective cohort as it was over time (even tho it compared neighbouring populations)
Best method to reduce information bias in this study:
- Measure a 95% confidence interval
- Measure the p value
- Double-blinded study
- Multi-centre study
- Placebo-controlled
- Randomisation
- Having exclusion criteria
- Using a logistic regression analysis
Double-blinded
Mammogram has a sensitivity of 0.8 and specificity of 0.9. In a population of 1000, the prevalence of breast cancer is 2%. How many false negatives will there be if this population is screened?
4
What kind of outbreak is this in the graph
Propagated/person-to-person
PSA - screened group did better than non-screened group
Overdiagnosis bias
Drug A vs Drug B. Drug A is better than Drug B according to a study (p<0.01). what does this mean
a) There is a 1% chance of drug A being better
b) The observed difference is <0.01% likely to be due to chance
c) This means the difference observed is unlikely to be due to chance
This means the difference observed is unlikely to be due to chance
Most important justification for implementing screening test for specific disease
a) Effective treatment available
b) Low number of false positives
c) Early detection of disease of interest
d) Early detection favourably affects natural history of disease
Early detection favourably affects natural history of disease (kind of similar to a but pop off ig)
Doctor wants to measure incidence of Hep C in his/her town. What information should he use?
a) New notifications in last 5 years
b) Number of people with Hep C
c) Number of people with + Hep C antibodies
d) Number of people with Hep recently found through PCR.
e) Number of IV drug users enrolled in practice
New notifications last 5 years
Doctor wants to measure prevalence of Hep C in his/her town.
a. New notifications in last 5 years
b. Number of people on treatment for Hep C
c. Number of people with + Hep C antibodies
d. Number of people with positive Hep C PCR
Number of people with positive Hep C PCR
Best study design for assessing association between number of common naevus and progression to malignant melanoma?
Case-control
Cohort
RCT
Cross sectional
Ecological
Cohort - prob cant remember if they had a mole before idk
Pesticide drift and breast cancer. Used case-control as a study. What is the advantage of using this study?
Good for common outcomes
Good for common exposures
Good for rare outcomes
Good for rare exposures
Temporal sequencing
Good for rare outcomes
Man presents with a rash, which of these would need to be notified?
Varicella
Measles
Pityriasis rosea
Drug reaction
Measles
Worst hierarchical evidence
Case report
Case control
Meta-analysis
Cohort
Case report - just 1 person
Screening population does better due to less aggressive stuff identified. What kind of bias is this?
Length bias
(more aggressive diseases are asymptomatic for a shorter period, screening is more likely to detect slower progressing diseases, such as slow-growing tumours, which have a better prognosis, including longer survival.)