Public goods and complete market failure Flashcards
1
Q
Define public goods
A
- non-rival
- non-excludable in consumption
- prevent mkt frm functioning, result in complete mkt failure (situation where mkt is unable to provide for it)
2
Q
Non-rivalry in consumption
A
- does not reduce qty available to another person
- e.g. streetlight doesn’t get dimmer when one is using it
- marginal cost of providing good to additional user =0
- opt resource allocation: P=MC, with zero MC – means that px has to be zero (according to principle)
- society pov: not desirable to charge consumers for gd
- no firm wants to supply, no revenue – complete mkt failure
3
Q
Non-excludable in consumption
A
- difficult to exclude non-payers frm enjoying gd
- free rider problem
- no one willing to pay for consumption of gd
- no profit-maximizing firm wants to produce gd
4
Q
Example of public gd
A
- defense, flood control
- building dam protects valley
- impossible and undesirable to charge mkt px
- satisfies collective wants, indivisible (cannot be sold or produced in small units) – high cost, unattractive for profit-maximising firms
5
Q
Public/gov provision
A
- taxpayers’ money
- fund provision, spread cost over large no. of ppl who would not be prepared to pay individually
- might not achieve socially opt lvl due to imperfect knowledge
- produce more than S.O. lvl –> wastage of resources (inefficient allocation)
- bureaucracy and red tape – slow down decision-making, waste resources
- 2013, SG civil service topped 12 Asian economies (PERC report) – gov failure less likely in SG
6
Q
Contracting out to private sector
A
- provide financing (tax revenues) for pdtn of gd
- allow private producer run it
- e.g. contract construction firms to build highways
7
Q
Contracting private sector evaluation (+ve)
A
- competitive tendering – competition between firms to provide svc, lowest cost picked
- access to broader range of skills and tech
- btr quality and lower cost than if gov provided it
8
Q
Contracting private sector evaluation (-ve)
A
- firms only engage if profits is earned (controversial)
- charge high px for svc
- risk of qlty being reduced/compromised due to competitive tendering
- corrupt gov might choose private firm to help increase profits frm taxpayer money
- imperfect knowledge