Positive externality of production Flashcards
1
Q
Merit goods
A
- socially desirable
- intrinsically good
- encourage consumption
- failure of information to consumer
- do not fully perceive full benefits at time (e.g. Long term benefits of education)
- undervalue product, underconsumption when left to mkt forces alone
- gov involvement in resource allocation e.g. subsidizing education
2
Q
Subsidies
A
- correct +ve externalities of pdtn
- give subsidy = MEB
- compare MPB=MPC, MSB=MSC
- ss curve (MPC) shift right as ss increases
- px falls, induce consumers to increas econsumption
- qdd rises to Qs (socially opt lvl)
- efficient in society POV
3
Q
Evaluation of subsidy (+ve)
A
- effective in increasing qty of gd produced and consumed
- lowering px for consumers
4
Q
Evaluation of subsidy (-ve)
A
- difficult achieving optimum results (MSC=MSB)
- subsidies – tax revenue, many alternate uses, each has opp cost
- not possible for gov to subsidize all gds with +ve pdtn ext, must make a choice on which gd to support and how much
- difficult to measure size of ext benefits
- hard to calculate which gd/svc should be supported and lvl of support to receive
- highly political, gov might succumb to political pressure – make choices via political criteria instead of economic (which gives the most benefit)
- real world: unlikely able to shift MPC curve by correct amt to correct +ve ext, hope that is raise consumption close to Qs
5
Q
Gov provision evaluation (-ve)
A
- opp cost (tax revenue)
- difficult to measure size of ext benefits
6
Q
Legislation and regulation evaluation
A
- difficult to calculate size of ext benefits
- difficult to determine level of support gds should receive
- e.g 6 years compulsory education might not be socially opt lvl
- can only help to shift MPB curve in the right direction
- raise px, unaffordable to some consumer groups
- legislation and regulation implement tgt w direct provision and subsidies – more effective e.g education (compulsory schooling and direct gov provision)
7
Q
Nudges
A
- similar effect to legislation and education
- shift MPB rightwards to MSB
- e.g. creating bicycle lanes to encourage use of bike riding, fewer lifts in building
- difficult to design effective nudges, not enough known abt how consumers respond to particular nudges/choice infrastructure
- may not have same effect across income and cultural grps e.g. healthcare, low-income grps cannot afford