Psychopathology Flashcards
Ellis’ ABC model
A - activating event
B - belief
C - consequence
Examples of ABC model
Person not suffering from depression = A - trolley hits car B - knows it was accident C - healthy emotion and eventually acceptance Person suffering from depression = A - trolley hits car B - believe it happened with malicious intent and is their own fault C - extreme anger and elongated upset
Ellis’ cognitive explanation of depression
IRRATIONAL BELIEF causes depression. Irrational thinking stems from the idea that something ‘must’ be in order to be happy:
1) I must be accepted
2) I must do well
3) I must be happy
The individual will not be depressed because of these thoughts, but because they aren’t happening (they are unrealistic) but this makes the depressive feel worthless.
Cognitive explanations to depression
- Ellis’ ABC model
- Beck’s Negative Triad
Beck’s Negative triad
- Depressed individuals thinking is biased towards negative interpretation.
- NEGATIVE SCHEMAS acquired at childhood. Schemas are activated when a new situation resembles the original. A negative schema causes:
1) Negative view of self
2) Negative view of world
3) Negative view of future
Systematic Cognitive Biases
When individuals over-generalise, making conclusions on self-worth based off one piece of negative feedback.
Support for Ellis’ ABC model
Hammen and Krantz, 1976 - depressed patients made more errors in logic test than non-depressed patients (depression linked to irrational thinking).
Negatives of the cognitive explanation
- We don’t know whether irrational beliefs cause depression or are a result of depression.
- Suggests patients are responsible for disorder as its their thought process. Can be a set back in their recovery.
- Alternative explanations. Biological/ role of genes.
- Alloy and Abrahamson, 1979. Depressive realists just see things for how they really are. Implies negative beliefs aren’t irrational.
Positives of cognitive explanation
Useful applications for treating depression. CBT is successful proving theory correct. Improves quality of patient’s life.
Cognitive approach to treating depression
CBT
Ellis’ ABCDEF model
Disputing
Diathesis Stress
We have genetic vulnerability to depression which is triggered by environmental stressors. Considers more than one factor - not reductionist.
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy
A way of challenging irrational thoughts. Rational Emotive Behavioural Therapy:
- Challenges irrational belief (through dispute)
- To resolve emotional problems…
- Which improves behaviour.
Homework tasks given to encourage a change in behaviour in everyday life. Behavioural activation (encouraging patients to do something they used to enjoy). Unconditional positive regard (acceptance from therapist no matter what).
Ellis’ ABCDEF model
ABC as usual…
D - disputing irrational belief
E - effects of dispute, peoples thoughts improve
F - feelings, new emotions are produced.
Types of disputing
Logical - challenging negative thoughts by showing they are not rational.
Empirical - showing self defeating beliefs aren’t consistent with reality.
Pragmatic - emphasising lack of usefulness of negativity.
Designed to make patient think more rationally. Often given homework to encourage behavioural activation. Also shown unconditional positive regard to aid the patients self-belief.
Abnormality - deviation from social norms
Unstated rules about how we should behave in society. Anyone behaving differently to this is classed abnormal.
:) = easy to define someone as this.
\:( = culturally relative (what's normal in one culture might not be in another; we shouldn't make judgment). \:( = context dependent (man dressed as rabbit on stag do not abnormal; is in everyday life).
Abnormality - deviation from ideal mental health
There is an ideal state of mental health:
P-ostive attitude to self R-esistance to stress A-utonomy (independence) A-ccurate perception of reality M-astery of environment S-elf actualisation
The absence of any of the above criteria is classed as abnormality.
:) = positive view. Rather than focusing on what someone doesn’t have, provides ideal criteria to aim for.
\:( = culturally bias (individualistic aspiration, focuses on self. May not apply to collectivist cultures who focus more on the betterment of everyone). \:( = unrealistic and difficult to achieve. Criteria cannot be fulfilled at all times.
Abnormality - failure to function
An inability to function adequately or cope with everyday life/stress. Distressed with life and themselves and their behaviour will often affect others as well.
:) = easy to categorise.
\:( = subjective, stress varies from person to person so how can we be sure what levels are required to be classed as abnormal. \:( = Harrold Shipman didn't appear to fail to function but was a murderer. He was happy and coped so wouldn't be classed as abnormal despite killing people. Hence, this category cannot be applied to all situations/people. \:( = culturally bias, eg, morning in one country may be seen as failing to function or cope (as death should be celebrated) but in others it is acceptable.
Abnormality - statistical infrequency
Behaviours that are extremely rare. Anyone who falls at top or bottom of statistical data is classed as abnormal.
:) = data is quantitative and easy to handle/measure.
\:( = some people just fall into a category whilst others are at the far end; both will be classed as the same thing despite their difference, so not always accurate. \:( = disorders (depression) considered abnormal by other definitions, actually common so wouldn't be classed as abnormal by this one. \:( = assumes rare behaviours are abnormal (high IQ) but people may not want to be classed as this.
What are phobias?
Irrational, consistent fears that produces out of proportion reactions. Disrupts everyday life and conscious avoidance tactics will be made.
3 forms of phobia:
1) agoraphobia - trapped in public space with no escape
2) social phobia - anxiety related to social situations
3) specific phobia - fear of object or situation
Responses to phobias
Emotion = excessive stress / panic / terror
Behaviour = freeze / hyperventilate / avoid / cry
Cognitive = irrational belief that they will die / its a huge danger / how to get away
Behaviourist explanation of phobias
Two process model - classical conditioning develops phobia, operant conditioning maintains phobia.
Classical conditioning = develop phobia by associating object or situation with a traumatic event (see Little Albert case study).
Operant conditioning/negative reinforcement = repeating a behaviour to avoid a negative consequence. One will repeatedly use avoidance tactics to escape their fear. Therefore because they never confront their fear, it is maintained.
Little Albert (behaviourist approach to phobias)
- Albert presented with a rat (NS). No response.
- Exposed to loud noise (UCS), causing distress (UCR).
- Rat and loud noise presented together, causing upset.
- Eventually only rat was presented (CS).
- Even without noise, an association of trauma had been made with the rat, and upset was caused each time it was presented. Albert’s phobia of white rats becomes the conditioned response (CR).
Positive applications of behaviourist explanation to phobias
Knowledge of how phobia was acquired can help improve treatment. This will improve someone’s quality of life and the economy (back in the work place).
Negatives of behaviourist explanation to phobias
Alternative explanations. For example:
Cognitive approach = logically thinking about the danger something can bring.
Evolutionary = natural, genetic fears that prevent us from putting ourselves in danger (eg, heights).
Social learning theory = we learn phobias from role models. Similarly, if role model is rewarded for phobia (receives sympathy) imitation is more likely (so as to get attention).
Counterconditioning (phobias)
Reversing the conditioning process, by pairing the feared stimulus with something positive.
Reciprocal inhibition (phobias)
The process of inhibiting anxiety by replacing feelings of fear and distress with positive, relaxed thoughts.