Psychopathology Flashcards
What is Statistical Inequality?
- Involves the use of numerical data from statistics to determine whether a behavior or trait is common among the majority of individuals (and therefore considered normal) or rare (and therefore classified as abnormal).
What does a Normal Distribution Curve look like?
- The normal distribution curve shows the majority of people as being in the middle - these people are defined as ‘normal’.
- Relatively few people fall at either end. However, if they are then they are defined as ‘abnormal’.
What are the strengths of Statistical Infrequency?
Real-World Application
- Statistical infrequency has proven to be a valuable tool in clinical practice. It is used to determine formal diagnoses as well as to assess the severity of an individual’s symptoms.
- For instance, a diagnosis of intellectual disability disorder requires an IQ score below 70, which is in the bottom 28%. Another example of statistical infrequency in practice is the Beck Depression Inventory (BD), where a score of 30 or higher, indicating severe depression, is considered in the top 5% of respondents. These examples demonstrate the usefulness of the statistical infrequency criterion in both diagnostic and assessment procedures.
What are the limitations of Statistical Infrequency?
- Infrequent characteristics can be positive as well as negative. While someone with an IQ below 70 is considered abnormal, there is someone else with an IQ above 130 who is not seen as abnormal. Similarly, a person with a very low depression score on the BDI is not considered abnormal. These examples demonstrate that unusual characteristics do not always indicate abnormality.
- Thus, although statistical infrequency can be useful in diagnosis and assessment, it should not be the sole basis for defining abnormality.
How is deviation from social norms connected to abnormality?
- Deviation from social norms is often noticed when an individual’s behavior differs from what is expected in society.
- People tend to define abnormal behavior based on their sense of what is acceptable or normal.
- This collective judgement determines what is considered right in a society.
How are social norms culture-specific?
- Social norms are culture-specific, there are only a few behaviors that are universally classified as abnormal.
- For instance, homosexuality, which was previously regarded as abnormal in some cultures, is no longer deemed abnormal in many cultures.
- Similarly, behaviors that are socially unacceptable in one culture may be tolerated or even celebrated in another.
What are the strengths of deviation from social norms to define abnormality?
Real world application
- Deviation from social norms is a useful criterion in clinical practice, particularly in psychiatry. Antisocial personality disorder is defined by the failure to conform to culturally acceptable ethical behavior, such as aggression, recklessness, deceitfulness, and violation of others’ rights. These behaviors are all deviations from social norms.
- Similarly, in the diagnosis of schizotypal personality disorder, the term ‘strange’ is used to characterize the behavior, thinking, and appearance of individuals with the disorder. This demonstrates that the deviation from social norms criterion is valuable in psychiatry.
What are the limitations of deviation from social norms to define abnormality?
Cultural and Situational Relativism
- Social norms vary greatly across cultures and settings, and what is considered acceptable or normal in one culture may be perceived as deviant or abnormal in another.
- For instance, hearing voices can be viewed as normal in some cultures, while in most parts of the UK, it is considered a sign of abnormality. Moreover, social norms can also differ depending on the situation within the same culture, making it difficult to consistently apply the deviation from social norms criterion.
How is deviation from failure to function adequately connected to abnormality?
- Failure to function adequately is a definition of abnormality where a person is considered abnormal if they are unable to cope with the demands of everyday life, or experience personal distress.
- They may be unable to perform the behaviours necessary for day-to-day living, e.g., self-care, holding down a job, interacting meaningfully with others, making themselves understood, etc.
What are the specific characteristics of failure to function adequately?
Rosenhan & Seligman (1989) suggest the following characteristics that define failure to function adequately:
- Suffering
- Maladaptiveness (danger to self)
- Vividness & unconventionality (stands out)
- Unpredictably & a loss of control
- Irrationality/incomprehensibility
- Causes observer discomfort
- Violates moral/social standards
What are the strengths of failure to function adequately to define abnormality?
Real world application
- This measure of abnormality provides clear guidelines for the classification and diagnosis of abnormality as it is focused on observable signs that an individual is not coping e.g. lack of hygiene, clear behavioural distress signals
- These observable signs allow for the individual to receive help
- Checklists such as those provided by Rosenhan & Seligman (1989) can be used to assess the degree of FTFA, which increases the reliability and objectivity of the measure
What are the limitations of failure to function adequately to define abnormality?
Adaptive behaviour
- One limitation of this definition is that apparently abnormal behaviour may actually be helpful, functional, and adaptive for the individual.
- For example, a person who has the obsessive-compulsive disorder of hand-washing may find that the behaviour makes him cheerful, happy, and better able to cope with his day.
- Many people engage in behaviour that is maladaptive/harmful or threatening to self, but we don’t class them as abnormal: e.g. Adrenaline sports
How is deviation from ideal mental health connected to abnormality?
- This means that rather than defining what is abnormal, psychologists define what normal/ideal mental health is, and anything that deviates from this is regarded as abnormal.
- This requires us to decide on the characteristics we consider necessary for mental health.
How did Jahoda describe the speicifc characterisics of deviation from ideal mental health?
Jahoda (1958) defined six criteria by which mental health could be measured:
- A positive view of the self
- Capability for growth and development
- Autonomy and independence
- Accurate perception of reality
- Positive friendships and relationships
- Environmental mastery – able to meet the varying demands of day-to-day situations
What are the strengths of deviation from ideal mental health to define abnormality?
Real world application
- A strength is that this definition allows for an individual who is struggling to have targeted intervention if their behaviour is not ‘normal’. For example, their distorted thinking could be addressed to help their behaviour become normal, as if their thinking is biased then their behaviour will be too.
- This idea allows for clear goals to be set and focused upon to achieve ideal mental health, and, in Jahoda’s opinion, to achieve normality.
What are the limitations of deviation from ideal mental health to define abnormality?
- It is practically impossible for any individual to achieve all of the ideal characteristics all of the time. For example, a person might not be the ‘master of his environment’ but be happy with his situation.
- The criteria of autonomy makes the collectivist cultures, where the greater good and helping / relying on others is encouraged, seem abnormal. As most western cultures are individualist the criteria outlined by Jahoda seem a reasonable fit, but non-western cultures cannot relate to the criteria she outlines. This means that the definition is ethnocentric.
What is the DSM system?
- There are a number of systems for classifying and diagnosing mental health problems. Perhaps the best known is the DSM. This stands for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder and is published by the American Psychiatric Association.
- The DSM is updated every so often as ideas about abnormality change. The current version is the 5th edition so it is commonly called the DSM-5. This was published in 2013.
How is Panic described as a behavioural characteristics of phobias?
- A phobic person may panic in response to the presence of the phobic stimulus. Panic may involve a range of behaviours including crying, screaming or running away.
- Children may react slightly differently, for example by freezing, clinging or having a tantrum.
How is Avoidance described as a behavioural characteristics of phobias?
- Unless the sufferer is making a conscious effort to face their fear they tend to go to a lot of effort to avoid coming into contact with the phobic stimulus. This can make it hard to go about daily life.
- For example, someone with a fear of public toilets may have to limit the time they spend outside the home in relation to how long they can last without a toilet. This in turn can interfere with work, education and a social life.
How is Endurance described as a behavioural characteristics of phobias?
- The alternative to avoidance is endurance, in which a sufferer remains in the presence of the phobic stimulus but continues to experience high levels of anxiety. This may be unavoidable in some situation, for example for a person who has an extreme fear of flying.
What is Flooding Therapy?
- The client is exposed to the feared object without the ability to escape.
- This causes them to have a panic attack but they cannot biologically maintain this state so the fear will eventually subside.
- This means they will have re-learned the fear response, so they are not phobic anymore.
- Fear is a time-limited response. At first, the person is in extreme anxiety, perhaps even panic, but eventually, exhaustion sets in, and the anxiety level decreases.
- Prolonged intense exposure eventually creates a new association between the feared object and something positive (e.g., a sense of calm and lack of anxiety)
How is Flooding carried out?
- Flooding aims to expose the sufferer to the phobic object or situation in a safe and controlled environment for an extended period.
- Unlike systematic desensitization, which might use in virtual exposure, flooding generally involves in-vivo (real life) exposure.
What is Systematic Desensitisation
- SD is a behavioural therapy designed to gradually reduce phobic anxiety. This technique is based on the basis that what the maladaptive behaviour (negative) can be unlearned
- It is based on the principles of classical conditioning.
- The aim of the therapy is to replace the associated panic/fear response with a relaxation response instead.
Replacing an old response with a new one is called counterconditioning!
Who was systematic desensitisation created by and how is it carried out?
- This form of behavioural therapy was developed by Wolpe in the 1950’s and uses a classical conditioning method where the patient is gradually and systematically introduced to the phobic stimulus.
- He claimed that this form of therapy had an 80-90% success rate in treating phobias after only 25-30 sessions.
- Systematic desensitisation can be carried out in vitro, where the patient is asked to imagine the phobic stimulus or, less frequency or at the end of the sessions, in vivo which involves the patient actually being exposed to the situation or object.