PSYCHOPATHOLOGY Flashcards
STATISTICAL INFREQUENCY
According to the statistical definition any relatively common (usual) behaviour or characteristic can be thought of as ‘normal’, and any behaviour that lies on both ends of a normal distibution curve (unusual) is abnormal:
EXAMPLE: IQ AND INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY DISORDER
This statistical approach comes into its own when dealing with characteristics that can be reliably measured, for example intelligence. In any human characteristic, the majority of people’s scores will cluster around the average, and that the further we go above or below that average, the fewer people will attain that score. This is called the normal distribution.
The average IQ is set at 100. In a normal distribution, most people (68%) have a score (IQ) in the range from 85 to 115. Only 2% of people have a score below 70. Those individuals scoring below 70 are very unusual or abnormal and are liable to receive a diagnosis of a psychological disorder - intellectual disability disorder (IDD).
AO3: strength of STATISTICAL INFREQUENCY
useful for diagnosing IDD and depression
One strength of statistical infrequency is its usefulness.
Statistical infrequency is used in clinical practice, both as part of formal diagnosis and as a way to assess the severity of an individual’s symptoms. For example, a diagnosis of intellectual disability disorder requires an IQ of below 70 (bottom 2%). An example of statistical infrequency used in an assessment fool is the Beck depression inventory (BDI). A score of 30+ (top 5% of respondents) is widely interpreted as indicating severe depression.
This shows that the value of the statistical infrequency criterion is useful in diagnostic and assessment processes.
AO3: limitation of STATISTICAL INFREQUENCY
infrequent characteristics can be positive - IQ
One limitation of statistical infrequency is that infrequent characteristics can be positive as well as negative.
For ever person with an IQ below 70, there is another with an IQ above 130. Yet, we would not think of someone as abnormal for having a high IQ. Similarly, we would not think of someone with a very low depression score on the BDI as abnormal. These examples show that being unusual or at one end of a psychological spectrum does not necessarily make someone abnormal.
This means that, although statistical infrequency can form part of assessment and diagnostic procedures, it is never sufficient as the sole basis for defining abnormality.
DEVIATION FROM SOCIAL NORMS
Most of us notice people whose behaviour represents a deviation from social norms, i.e. when a person behaves in a way that is different from how we expect people to behave. Groups of people choose to define behaviour as abnormal on the basis that it offends their sense of what is acceptable or the norm.
We are making a collective judgement as a society about what is right.
Social norms may be different for each generation and different in every culture, so
there are relatively few behaviours that would be considered universally abnormal on the basis that they breach social norms.
For example, homosexuality was considered abnormal in our culture in the past and continues to be viewed as abnormal (and illegal) in some cultures. Therefore, norms are specific to the culture we live in
AO3: strength of DFSN
useful in psychiatry - APD
One strength of deviation from social norms is its usefulness.
Deviation from social norms is used in clinical practice. For example, the key defining characteristic of antisocial personality disorder is the failure to conform to culturally acceptable ethical behaviour - e.g. recklessness, aggression, violating the rights of others and deceitfulness. These signs of the disorder are all deviations from social norms.
Such norms also play a part in the diagnosis of schizotypal personality disorder, where the term ‘strange’ is used to characterise the thinking, behaviour, and appearance of people with the disorder.
This shows that the deviation from social norms criterion has value in psychiatry.
AO3: limitation of DFSN
cultural and situational relativism
One limitation of deviation from social norms is the variability between social norms in different cultures and even different situations.
A person from one cultural group may label someone from another group as abnormal using their standards rather than the person’s standards. For example, the experience of hearing voices is the norm in some cultures as messages from ancestors) but would be seen as a sign of abnormality in most parts of the UK. Also, even within one cultural context social norms differ from one situation to another. For example, it is fine to be naked in a nudist beach, but not in the town square.
This means that it is difficult to judge deviation from social norms across different situations and cultures.
FAILURE TO FUNCTION ADEQUATELY
A person may cross the line between ‘normal’ and ‘abnormal’ at the point when they can no longer cope with the demands of everyday life.
We might decide that someone is not functioning adequately when they are unable to maintain basic standards of nutrition and hygiene.
We might also consider that they are no longer functioning adequately if they cannot hold down a job or maintain relationships with people around them.
Seligman has proposed some additional signs that can be used to determine when someone is not coping. These include:
· When a person no longer conforms to standard interpersonal rules
· When a person experiences severe personal distress.
· When a person’s behaviour becomes irrational or dangerous to themselves or others.
AO3: strength of FFA
sensible treshold for help
One strength of the failure to function criterion is that it represents a sensible threshold for when people need professional help.
Most of us have symptoms of mental disorder to some degree at some time. In fact, according to the mental health charity Mind, around 25% of people in the UK will experience a mental health problem in any given year. However, many people press on in the face of fairly severe symptoms. It tends to be at the point that we cease to function adequately that people seek professional help or are noticed and referred for help by others.
This criterion means that treatment and services can be targeted to those who need them most.
AO3: limitation of FFA
discriminative - non standard lifestyles
One limitation of failure to function is that it is easy to label non-standard lifestyle choices as abnormal.
In practice it can be very hard to say when someone is really failing to function and when they have simply chosen to deviate from social norms. Not having a job or permanent address might seem like failing to function, and for some people it would be. However, people with alternative lifestyles choose to live off-grid: Similarly, those who favour high -risk leisure activities or unusual spiritual practices could be classed, unreasonably, as irrational, and perhaps a danger to self.
This means that people who make unusual choices are at risk of being labelled abnormal and their freedom of choice may be restricted.
DEVIATION FROM IDEAL MENTAL HEALTH
Ignores the issue of what makes someone abnormal but instead think about what makes anyone ‘normal’:
Once we have a picture of how we should be psychologically healthy then we can begin to identify who deviates from this ideal.
Jahoda suggested that we are in good mental health if we meet the following criteria:
· We have no symptoms or distress.
· We are rational and can perceive ourselves accurately.
· We self-actualise (strive to reach our potential).
· We can cope with stress.
· We have a realistic view of the world.
· We have good self-esteem and lack guilt.
· We are independent of other people.
· We can successfully work, love, and enjoy our leisure.
AO3: strength of DFIMH
highly comprehensive - can be discussed with a variety of professionals
One strength of the ideal mental health criterion is that it is highly comprehensive.
Jahoda’s concept of ideal mental health includes a range of criteria for distinguishing mental health from mental disorder. In fact, it covers most of the reasons why we might seek (or be referred for) help with mental health. This in turn means that an individual’s mental health can be discussed meaningfully with a range of professionals who might take different theoretical views e.g. a medically trained psychiatrist might focus on stress, whereas a humanistic counsellor might be more interested in self-actualisation.
This means that ideal mental health provides a checklist against which we can assess ourselves and others and discuss psychological issues with a range of professionals.
AO3: limitation of DFIMH
cultural relativism
One limitation of the ideal mental health criterion is that it’s different elements are not equally applicable across a range of cultures.
Some of Jahoda’s criteria for ideal mental health are firmly located in the context of the US and Europe generally. In particular the concept of self-actualisation would probably be dismissed as self-indulgent in much of the world. Even within Europe there is quite a bit of variation in the value placed on personal independence, e.g. high in Germany, low in Italy.
Furthermore, what defines success in our working, social and love-lives is very different in different cultures.
This means that it is difficult to apply the concept of ideal mental health from one culture to another.
BEHAVIOURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PHOBIAS
panic
avoidance
endurance
PANIC
A person with a phobia may panic in response to the presence of the phobic stimulus.
Panic may involve a range of behaviours including crying, screaming, or running away. Children may react slightly differently, for example by freezing, clinging, or having a tantrum.
AVOIDANCE
Unless the person is making a conscious effort to face their fear, they tend to go to a lot of effort to prevent coming into contact with the phobic stimulus. This can make it hard to go about daily life.
For example, someone with a fear of public toilets may have to limit the time they spend outside the home in relation to how long they can last without a toilet. This in turn can interfere with work, education, and a social life.
ENDURANCE
The alternative behavioural response to avoidance is endurance. This occurs when the person chooses to remain in the presence of the phobic stimulus.
For example, a person with arachnophobia might choose to remain in a room with a spider on the ceiling and keep a wary eye on it rather than leaving.
EMOTIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PHOBIAS
anxiety
fear
unreasonable emotional response
ANXIETY
Phobias are classed as anxiety disorders. By definition then they involve an emotional response of anxiety, an unpleasant state of high arousal. This prevents a person relaxing. and makes it very difficult to experience any positive emotion. Anxiety can be long term.
FEAR
Fear is the immediate and extremely unpleasant response we experience when we encounter or think about a phobic stimulus. It is usually more intense but experienced for shorter periods than anxiety.
UNREASONABLE EMOTIONAL RESPONSE
The anxiety or fear is much greater than is ‘normal’ and disproportionate to any threat posed. For example, a person with arachnophobia will have a strong emotional response to a tiny spider. Most people would respond in a less anxious way even to a poisonous spider.
COGNITIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF PHOBIAS
The cognitive element is concerned with the ways in which people process information.
People with phobias process information about phobic stimuli differently from other objects or situations.
selective attention to the phobic stimulus
cognitive distortions
irrational beliefs
SELECTIVE ATTENTION TO THE PHOBIC STIMULUS
If a person can see the phobic stimulus, it is hard to look away from it. Keeping our attention on something really dangerous is a good thing as it gives us the best chance of reacting quickly to a threat, but this is not so useful when the fear is irrational.
IRRATIONAL BELIEFS
A person with a phobia may hold unfounded thoughts in relation to phobic stimuli, ie that can’t easily be explained and don’t have any basis in reality.
This kind of belief increases the pressure on the person to perform well in social situations.
COGNITIVE DISTORTIONS
The perceptions of a person with a phobia may be inaccurate and unrealistic.
So, for example, someone with mysophobia sees mushrooms as disgusting, and an ophidiophobia may see snakes as alien and aggressive looking.
ACQUISITION BY CLASSICAL CONDITIONING
Classical conditioning involves learning to associate something of which we initially have no fear (called a neutral stimulus) with something that already triggers a fear response known as an unconditioned stimulus).
Watson and Rayner created a phobia in a 9-month-old baby called ‘Little Albert’.
Albert showed no unusual anxiety at the start of the study when shown a white rat he tried to play with it. However, the experimenters then set out to give Albert a phobia. Whenever the rat was presented to Albert the researchers made a loud, frightening noise by banging an iron bar close to Albert’s ear. This noise is an unconditioned stimulus (UCS) which creates an unconditioned response (UCR) of fear. When the rat (a neutral stimulus, NS) and the UCS are encountered close together in time the NS becomes associated with the UCS, and both now produce the fear response - Albert displayed fear when he saw a rat (the NS). The rat is now a learned or conditioned stimulus (CS) that produces a conditioned response (CR)/
This conditioning then generalised to similar objects. They tested Albert by showing him other furry objects such as a non-white rabbit, a fur coat and Watson wearing a Santa Claus beard made out of cotton balls. Little Albert displayed distress at the sight of all of these.
THE TWO-PROCESS MODEL
The behavioural approach emphasises the role of learning in the acquisition of behaviour.
Mower proposed the two-process model based on the behavioural approach to phobias.
This states that
phobias are learnt by classical conditioning and maintained because of operant conditioning
MAINTENANCE BY OPERANT CONDITIONING
Responses acquired by classical conditioning usually tend to decline over time. However, phobias are often long-lasting. Mower has explained this as the result of operant conditioning.
Reinforcement tends to increase the frequency of a behaviour.
In the case of negative reinforcement an individual avoids a situation that is unpleasant. Such a behaviour results in a desirable consequence, which means the behaviour will be repeated.
Mower suggested that whenever we avoid a phobic stimulus,
we successfully escape the fear and anxiety that we would have experienced if we had remained there. This reduction in fear reinforces the avoidance behaviour and so the phobia is maintained.
AO3: strength of BEHAVIOURAL APPROACH TO EXPLAINING PHOBIAS
real world application - SD and flooding
One strength of the two-process model is its real-world application in exposure therapies such as systematic desensitisation and flooding.
The distinctive element of the two-process model is the idea that phobias are maintained by avoidance of the phobic stimulus. This is important in explaining why people with phobias benefit from being exposed to the phobic stimulus. Once the avoidance behaviour is prevented it ceases to be reinforced by the experience of anxiety reduction and avoidance therefore declines.
In behavioural terms the phobia is the avoidance behaviour so when this avoidance is prevented the phobia is cured.
This shows the value of the two-process approach because it identifies a means of treating phobias.
AO3: strength of BEHAVIOURAL APPROACH TO EXPLAINING PHOBIAS
research support - Ad de Jongh
A further strength of the two-process model is evidence for a link between bad experiences and phobias.
Ad De Jongh et al. found that 73% of people with a fear of dental treatment had experienced a traumatic experience, mostly involving dentistry (others had experienced being the victim of violent crime). This can be compared to a control group of people with low dental anxiety where only 21% had experienced a traumatic event.
This confirms that the association between stimulus (dentistry) and an unconditioned response (pain) does lead to the development of the phobia.
AO3: limitation of BEHAVIOURAL APPROACH TO EXPLAINING PHOBIAS
not all phobias are acquired through conditioning
Not all phobias appear following a bad experience.
In fact, some common phobias such as snake phobias occur in populations where very few people have any experience of snakes let alone traumatic experiences. Furthermore, not all traumatic experiences lead to a phobia- someone may be in a car accident, but never the develop a phobia of cars.
This suggests we are more likely to have phobias of things which posed a danger for our ancestors, and they provide adaptive advantage.
This is a problem for the behaviourist approachof explaining phobias because it means that more than conditioning is involved in the development of phobias
SYSTEMATIC DESENSITISATION
Systematic desensitisation (SD) is a behavioural therapy designed to gradually reduce phobic anxiety through the principles of classical conditioning:
If a person can learn to relax in the presence of the phobic stimulus they will be cured.
Essentially a new response to the phobic stimulus is learned (phobic stimulus is paired with relaxation instead of anxiety). This learning of a different response is called counterconditioning.
There are three processes involved in SD:
create anxiety hierarchy
relaxation techniques
move up the hierarchy
anxiety hierarchy
is put together by a client with phobia and therapist. This is a list of situations related to the phobic stimulus that provoke anxiety arranged in order from least to most frightening. For example, a person with arachnophobia might identify a picture of a small spider as low on their anxiety hierarchy and holding a tarantula at the top of the hierarchy.
relaxation techniques
The therapist teaches the client to relax as deeply as possible. It is impossible to be afraid and relaxed at the same time, so one emotion prevents the other. This is called reciprocal inhibition. The relaxation might involve breathing exercises or, alternatively, the client might learn mental imagery techniques. Clients can be taught to imagine themselves in relaxing situations or they might learn meditation.
move up the hierarchy
Finally, the client is exposed to the phobic stimulus while in a relaxed state. This takes place across several sessions, starting at the bottom of the anxiety hierarchy. When the client can stay relaxed in the presence of the lower levels of the phobic stimulus, they move up the hierarchy.
Treatment is successful when the client can stay relaxed in situations high on the anxiety hierarchy.
FLOODING
Flooding involves exposing people with a phobia to their phobic stimulus but without a
gradual build-up in an anxiety hierarchy. Instead flooding involves immediate exposure to a very frightening situation.
Flooding stops phobic responses very quickly. This may be because
without the option of avoidance behaviour, the client quickly learns that the phobic stimulus is harmless.
In classical conditioning terms this process is called extinction. A learned response is extinguished when the conditioned stimulus (e.g. a dog) is encountered without the unconditioned stimulus (e.g. being bitten). The result is that the conditioned stimulus no longer produces the conditioned response (fear).
AO3: strength of BEHAVIOURAL APPROACH TO TREATING PHOBIAS
SD research support - Gilroy
One strength of systematic desensitisation (SD) is the evidence base for its effectiveness.
Gilroy et al. followed up 42 people who had SD for spider phobia in three 45-minute sessions. At both three and 33 months, the SD group were less tearful than a control group treated by relaxation without exposure.
This means that SD is likely to be helpful for people with phobias.
AO3: strength of BEHAVIOURAL APPROACH TO TREATING PHOBIAS
FLOODING - cost effective
One strength of flooding is that it is highly cost-effective.
Clinical effectiveness means how effective a therapy is at tackling symptoms. However, when we provide therapies in health systems like the NHS, we also need to think about how much they cost. A therapy is cost-effective if it is clinically effective and not expensive. Flooding can work in as little as one session as opposed to say, ten sessions for SD to achieve the same result. Even allowing for a longer session makes flooding more cost-effective.
This means that more people can be treated at the same cost with flooding than with SD or other therapies.
AO3: strength of BEHAVIOURAL APPROACH TO TREATING PHOBIAS
SD useful for people with learing disabilities
A further strength of SD is that it can be used to help people with learning disabilities.
Some people requiring treatment for phobias also have a learning disability. However, the main alternatives to SD are not suitable. People with learning disabilities often struggle with cognitive therapies that require complex rational thought. They may also feel confused and distressed by the traumatic experience of flooding.
This means that SD is often the most appropriate treatment for people with learning disabilities who have phobias.
AO3: limitation of BEHAVIOURAL APPROACH TO TREATING PHOBIAS
FLOODING - traumatic (Schumacher)
One limitation of flooding is that it is a highly unpleasant experience.
Confronting one’s phobic stimulus in an extreme form provokes tremendous anxiety.
Schumacher found that participants and therapists rated flooding as significantly more stressful than SD. This raises the ethical issue for psychologists of knowingly causing stress to their clients, although this is not a serious issue provided, they obtain informed consent. More seriously, the traumatic nature of flooding means that dropout rates are higher than for SD.
This suggests that, overall, therapists may avoid using this treatment.
BEHAVIOURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF DEPRESSION
Behaviour changes when we experience an episode of depression.
CHANGE TO ACTIVITY LEVELS
DISRUPTION TO SLEEP AND EATING BEHAVIOUR
AGGRESSION AND SELF-HARM