Psychological explanations of offending behaviour Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Eysenck’s Theory

A

Our personality is innate and has a biological basis but a psychological approach
Varies between 3 dimensions;
-Psychotic
-Neurotic
-Extravert

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Extraversion

A

Someone who is sociable, talkative and outgoing
Under aroused NS= Sensation seeking= impulsive
The thrill of committing a crime may draw them to offending behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Neuroticism

A

Anxiety, insecurity, emotional instability
The lower threshold in the limbic system
Over aroused SNS where emotions are regulated = unstable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Psychotism

A

Aggressive and impulsive
Over production of dopamine= inhibition of impulses
=aggressive behaviour and lack of conscious
More likely to have increased testosterone (causes aggressive)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Environmental element

A

A person is born with a type of personality but their environment is what triggers the development of criminality
-Associated with maturity, selfishness and gratification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Conditioning

A
  1. A child is conditioned
  2. They learn between right and wrong
  3. Avoids punishment behaviour
  4. Child controls their impulses

High E + N= Act antisocially

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Eysencks Personality Questionnaire

A

(EPQ) 90 questions to assess personality traits
Also a lie score of 9 questions
Anything above 5 meant their responses to the questionnaire may be inaccurate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Eysencks study

A

2070 male prisoners
2422 male controls

Prisoners scored higher on EPQ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Cognitive distortions

A

Faulty, irrational ways of thinking
Can cause others to think negatively
Allows criminals to rationalise or deny behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

GIBBS

A

A way of thinking so the reality is twisted and what a person perceives is no longer actually true
Perception of events is wrong but they think it’s accurate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Examples of cognitive distortions

A
  1. Hostile attribution bias
  2. Minimalisation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Hostile attribution bias

A

When you observe someones actions and make inferences about what their actions mean Violence is caused by the perception that others actions are aggressive
Always think the worst= lead to aggressive and violent behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Hostile attribution bias

A

Someone pulling up their trousers
Infer that they’re getting ready to fight you (neg thoughts)
Leads to aggressive behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Wegrzyn et al

A

62 males (30 violent criminals, 15 with history of sexual abuse, 17 controls)
Shown 20 ambiguous faces (10 men, 10 females)
Asked to rate them on a scale of fear to anger
Violent criminals rated more angry faces compared to controls

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Schonenberg and Justye

A

55 violent offenders
Shown emotionally ambiguous facial expressions
Violent offenders interpreted it as angry faces compared to controls

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Minimalisation

A

A way of downplaying serious offences
Helps individuals accept the consequences of behaviour
More likely in those who commit sexual offences

17
Q

Barbara (1991)

A

Found among 26 imprisoned rapists;
54% denied they committed an offence
40% minimised the harm they caused to the victim

18
Q

Pollock and Hashmall (1991)

A

35% of a sample of child molesters said the crime was non-sexual
36% said the victims consented

19
Q

Moral Reasoning

A

KOHLBERG
The thinking that occurs as we consider what’s wrong and right
Criminals ideas of wrong and right is developed in childhood
Criminals reasoning is lower than non criminals

20
Q

Levels of moral reasoning

A
  1. Pre conventional
  2. Conventional
  3. Post conventional
21
Q
  1. Pre-conventional morality
A

Stage 1: An act is right or wrong depending on if it produces punishment or reward
Stage 2: Multiple views about right and wrong are recognised
Doing what’s right according to society

22
Q
  1. Conventional Morality
A

Stage 3: Doing what is right according to majority to be a good boy/girl
Stage 4: Doing what is right because its your duty and it helps society

23
Q
  1. Post-conventional Morality
A

Stage 5: Doing what’s right even if its against the law because the law is too restrictive
Stage 6: Doing what is right because of your inner conscious which has absorbed the principles of justice and equality and sacredness of life

24
Q

Kohlberg study

A

Longitudinal study over 12 years
75 young American males ages 10-16 and ended 22-28 years

10% of adults reach post-conventional level
The majority don’t progress from pre-conventional level

25
Q

Differential Association Theory

A

SUTHERLAND
Learn the values, attitudes, techniques and motivation for criminal behaviour
Learn from others
Two parts of the theory;
1. Learned attitudes towards the crime
2. Learning of specific criminal acts

26
Q
  1. Learned attitudes towards crime
A

Pro-criminal attitude= criminality
If pro-criminal attitudes outweigh anti-criminal attitudes an individual is more likely to offend
High frequency + duration + intensity to norms, attitudes and values, more likely to offend

27
Q
  1. Learning of specific criminal acts
A

Offender may also learn particular techniques for committing a crime
Learning through observation, direct tuition or imitation
Can help reoffending

28
Q

Psychodynamic explanation

A

Proposes that unconscious motivation developed during childhood are responsible for criminal tendencies

29
Q

The Superego

A

Final part of the personality that develops in the phallic stage
Product of nurture as it develops through interactions with parents

30
Q

Underdeveloped or weak superego

A

Lack of identification with same sex parents produces superego that is unable to control the id’s desires for instant gratification.
Lack of punishment by the superego equals no guilt for offending

31
Q

Overdeveloped or strong superego

A

The person feels guilty all the time and so engages in crime in order to be punished
Superego is over controlling it stops even trivial behaviour
Causes a build-up of pressure until it overwhelms the person and they erupt in violence

32
Q

Deviant superego

A

Develops as a result of internalising the parents moral values
If those morals are deviant the Child’s values are also deviant
Increases likelihood of offending

33
Q

Defence mechanisms

A

FREUD
Thoughts and desires cause anxiety and guilt are managed by the ego
Offending behaviour results from ego defences being engaged

34
Q

Maternal deprivation

A

BOWLBY
Proposed disruption during the critical period of no mother or surrogate mother can cause problems in later life
Affectionless psychopathy- inability to feel guilt or emotion