Psychological explanations of offending behaviour Flashcards
Eysenck’s Theory
Our personality is innate and has a biological basis but a psychological approach
Varies between 3 dimensions;
-Psychotic
-Neurotic
-Extravert
Extraversion
Someone who is sociable, talkative and outgoing
Under aroused NS= Sensation seeking= impulsive
The thrill of committing a crime may draw them to offending behaviour
Neuroticism
Anxiety, insecurity, emotional instability
The lower threshold in the limbic system
Over aroused SNS where emotions are regulated = unstable
Psychotism
Aggressive and impulsive
Over production of dopamine= inhibition of impulses
=aggressive behaviour and lack of conscious
More likely to have increased testosterone (causes aggressive)
Environmental element
A person is born with a type of personality but their environment is what triggers the development of criminality
-Associated with maturity, selfishness and gratification
Conditioning
- A child is conditioned
- They learn between right and wrong
- Avoids punishment behaviour
- Child controls their impulses
High E + N= Act antisocially
Eysencks Personality Questionnaire
(EPQ) 90 questions to assess personality traits
Also a lie score of 9 questions
Anything above 5 meant their responses to the questionnaire may be inaccurate
Eysencks study
2070 male prisoners
2422 male controls
Prisoners scored higher on EPQ
Cognitive distortions
Faulty, irrational ways of thinking
Can cause others to think negatively
Allows criminals to rationalise or deny behaviour
GIBBS
A way of thinking so the reality is twisted and what a person perceives is no longer actually true
Perception of events is wrong but they think it’s accurate
Examples of cognitive distortions
- Hostile attribution bias
- Minimalisation
Hostile attribution bias
When you observe someones actions and make inferences about what their actions mean Violence is caused by the perception that others actions are aggressive
Always think the worst= lead to aggressive and violent behaviour
Hostile attribution bias
Someone pulling up their trousers
Infer that they’re getting ready to fight you (neg thoughts)
Leads to aggressive behaviour
Wegrzyn et al
62 males (30 violent criminals, 15 with history of sexual abuse, 17 controls)
Shown 20 ambiguous faces (10 men, 10 females)
Asked to rate them on a scale of fear to anger
Violent criminals rated more angry faces compared to controls
Schonenberg and Justye
55 violent offenders
Shown emotionally ambiguous facial expressions
Violent offenders interpreted it as angry faces compared to controls