Psychological explanations: Eysenck’s theory Flashcards
Psychological explanations: Eysenck’s theory
└Eysenck (1947)
└the criminal personality: an individual who scores highly on measures of extraversion, neuroticism and psychoticism
└cannot be easily conditioned, is cold and unfeeling, is likenly to engage in offending behaviour
Psychological explanations: Eysenck’s theory
parts
General personality theory Biological basis Criminal personality Role of socialisation Measuring the criminal personality
General personality theory
└Eysenck (1947) └proposed behaviour could be represented along 2 dimensions └introversion / extraversion (E) └neuroticism / stability (N) └added a 3rd dimension └psychoticism (P)
Biological basis
└personality traits are biological in origin
└depends on the type of nervous system we inherit
└personality types e.g. criminal have innate biological basis
└extraverts: underactive nervous system
└constantly seek excitement and stimulation
└engage in risk taking behaviours
└don’t condition easily or learn from mistakes
└neurotic individuals: nervous, jumpy, anxious
└=unpredictable behaviour
Criminal personality
└criminal personality type= neurotic + extrovert
└combination of both their personality characteristics
└score high on psychoticism
└cold, unemotional, aggressive
Role of socialisation
└personality is linked to criminal behaviour via socialisation processes
└criminal behaviour= developmentally immature, impatient, concerned with immediate gratification
└socialisation: the process where children are taught to delay gratification and become more socially orientated
└people with high E and N scores had nervous systems that made them difficult to condition
└=wouldn’t learn to respond to antisocial situations with anxiety
└=more likely to act antisocially
Measuring the criminal personality
└personality can be measured
└Eysenck Personality Inventory (EPI)
└form of psychological test which determines personality type
Psychological explanations: Eysenck’s theory
strengths
Evidence supporting Eysenck’s theory
└Eysenck and Eysenck (1977)
└compared 2070 male prisoners scores on the EPI with 2422 male controls
└subdivided into age groups, 16-69
└prisoners scored higher than controls on measures of psychoticism, extraversion and neuroticism
└=supports theory
└HOWEVER Farrington et al (1982)
└reviewed studies
└found offenders scored high on P measures, not E and N
Psychological explanations: Eysenck’s theory
limitations
summary
Idea of a single criminal type - Terrie Moffitt (1993)
Cultural bias - Bartol and Holanchock (1979), Bartol et al
Psychological explanations: Eysenck’s theory
limitations
Idea of a single criminal type
└the idea that all offending behaviour can be explained by a single personality type has been heavily criticised
└Terrie Moffitt (1993)
└proposed several different types of male offender depending on when the first offence was and how long offending lasts
Psychological explanations: Eysenck’s theory
limitations
Cultural bias
└Bartol and Holanchock (1979)
└looked into cultural differences
└studied Hispanic and African-American offenders in a maximum securest prison in NY
└divided them into 6 groups depending on their offence
└all six groups less extrovert than non-criminal control group
└Bartol et al
└suggested this was because the sample was very culturally different than Eysencks
└=criminal personality cant be generalised