Offender profiling: The top-down approach Flashcards
Offender profiling: The top-down approach
parts
Offender profiling Top down approach Organised offender Disorganised offender Constructing an FBI profile Data assimilation, Crime scene classification, Crime reconstruction, Profile generation
Offender profiling
└a behavioural and analytical tool
└helps police solve crimes
└narrows field of suspects
└helps investigators accurately predict and profile characteristics of unknown criminals
└compiling a profile involves
└analysis of evidence e.g. witness reports
└to generate a hypothesis about probable characteristics of offender
Top down approach
└profilers start with pre-established typology
└work down to assign offenders to one of 2 categories
└based on witness accounts and evidence from the crime scene
└originated: United States (US), FBI, 1970s
└from in-depth interviews with 36 sexually motivated serial killers e.g. Ted Bundy
Types of offender
list
Organised offender
Disorganised offender
Organised offender
-an offender: └who shows evidence of planning └targets the victim └tends to be socially and sexually competent └higher than average intelligence └professional occupation └married/children
Disorganised offender
-an offender: who shows little evidence of planning └leaves clues └tends to be socially and sexually incompetent └lower than average intelligence └unemployed └failed relationships
Constructing an FBI profile
list
Data assimilation
Crime scene classification
Crime reconstruction
Profile generation
Constructing an FBI profile
Data assimilation
└profiler reviews evidence
└e.g. crime scene photos, pathology reports
Constructing an FBI profile
Crime scene classification
└organised or disorganised
Constructing an FBI profile
Crime reconstruction
└hypotheses in terms of sequence of events, behaviour of victim
Constructing an FBI profile
Profile generation
└hypothesis related to likely offender
└e.g. background, physical characteristics, behaviour
Offender profiling: The top-down approach
limitations
summary
Only applies to particular crimes
Based on out dated models of personality - Alison et al (2002)
Evidence doesn’t support the disorganised offender- Canter et al (2004)
Simplistic classification -Godwin (2002), Holmes (1989), Kepple and Walter (1999)
Original sample
Offender profiling: The top-down approach
limitations
Only applies to particular crimes
└suited to rape, arson, torture
└as important details can be revealed about the suspect
└not suited to more common offences such as burglary
└as crime scene reveals little about the offender
└=limited approach to identifying a criminal
Offender profiling: The top-down approach
limitations
Based on out dated models of personality
└the classification system is based on the assumption that an offenders motivations and pattern of behaviour is consistent across situations and contexts
└Alison et al (2002)
└this is naïve
└behaviour is driven by changing external factors > static dispositional traits
└=poor validity of model
Offender profiling: The top-down approach
limitations
Evidence doesn’t support the disorganised offender
└Canter et al (2004)
└used technique called smallest space analysis
└analysed 100 murders in USA with reference to 39 characteristics of organised and disorganised killers
└findings suggested distinct organised type, but not disorganised
└=undermines whole classification system