Psychiatric Injury Flashcards

1
Q

What is the definition for psychiatric injury

A
  • a long term diagnosed mental injury which is greater than grief or shock
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does not amount to psychiatric injury

A
  • grief, sorrow, panic and terror (Hinz v Berry)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the definition for a primary victim

A
  • a victim of an accident who suffers physical or mental injuries,or both
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the definition for a secondary victim

A
  • a person who suffers mental injury after witnessing an accident or its immediate aftermath
  • the case of Alcock v chief constable of south Yorkshire police put restrictions on who could claim as a secondary victim
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What 3 things must be satisfied to claim as a primary victim

A
  • must have been in ‘zone of danger’ - reasonable fear for their own physical safety due to negligent event (Dulieu v White)
  • if physical harm is foreseeable, so is psychiatric harm (page v smith)
  • must prove their mental harm is medically recognised form of psychiatric injury (glossary of mental disorders)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What 3 things must be satisfied to claim as a secondary victim

A
  • must have suffered recognised, diagnosed psychiatric injury (glossary of mental disorders)
  • psychiatric harm must be a foreseeable consequence of D’s negligence (Bourhill v Brown)
  • must fulfill criteria established in Alock to prove a relationship of Sufficient proximity to be able to claim
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the acronym for the elements of a successful secondary victim claim

A

(Established in Alcock)
- C A U S E

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Outline ‘close ties of love and affection’ as an element of the Alcock criteria

A
  • must be a close relationship between victim and claimant
  • parent/child, spouse/fiancé will automatically succeed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Outline ‘at the scene or aftermath’ as an element of the Alcock criteria

A
  • claimant must have suffered at the scene or shortly after
  • ‘aftermath’ is not defined but a 2 hour rule was established in the case of McLoughlin v O’brien
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Outline ‘unaided senses’ as an element of the Alcock criteria

A
  • psychiatric injury arose from witnessing injury or death of, or extreme danger or discomfort, to the primary victim through their own senses
  • TV/radio etc is not sufficient
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Outline ‘sudden shock’ as an element of the Alcock criteria

A
  • injury must be caused by sudden and direct appreciation of a horrifying event
  • rather than from ongoing stress,strain etc
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Outline ‘even if the above are satisfied.. ’ as an element of the Alcock criteria

A
  • a person with ‘reasonable fortitude’ also would need to have suffered the same reaction and injury, this is known as the threshold test
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Why is there strict criteria for secondary victim claims (policy reasons)

A
  • the risk of fraudulent claims
  • because of greatly increased evidentiary difficulties which would lengthen litigation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Are ‘rescuers’ primary or secondary victims

A
  • rescuers can be primary victims if - they assist at an accident, they can then claim for nervous shock
  • rescuers are secondary victims if - be default they are secondary victims
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly