Occupiers Liability Act 1957 Flashcards

1
Q

Definition of occupiers liability act 1957

A

Provided a statutory duty on the occupier towards lawful visitors in respect of dangers due to the state of the premises or things done/omitted to be done on the premises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is a lawful visitor

A
  • lawful adult visitors are invitees, licensees, those with contractual permission and those with a statutory right of entry
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What can lawful visitors include:

A
  • invitee’s - s1(2) - invited onto land, expressed permission to be there
  • licensees - S1(2) - those with expressed/implied permission to be there
  • those who enter pursuant to a contract S5(1) - E.g - paying visitors to see a film
  • those exercising statutory right S2(6) - reading gas meter
  • implied license at common law - repeated trespass, nothing done to prevent (lowery v walker)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is an ‘occupier’ in OLA 57

A
  • S1(2) - anyone with occupational control, does not have to own (wheat v Lacon)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the duty of care owed

A
  • S2 OLA 1957 - imposes a common duty of care to lawful visitors:
  • reasonable care must be taken to see the visitor will be REASONABLY SAFE
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is breach of duty

A

Failure to reach the required standard of care
- the occupier may have breached their duty in failing to reach the standard of care of the ‘reasonable occupier’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How do you discuss whether there has been a breach of duty in a case

A
  • P - public benefit
  • A - appropriate cautions ( was it easy to prevent danger?)
  • S - Size of risk/danger
  • E - even if above satisfied, discus probability - was danger likely to occur
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Variations in the standard of care for children

A
  • S2(2) + S2(3)(a)) - occupier must be ‘prepared for children to be less careful than adults (and as a result) the premises must be reasonably safe for a child of that age’
  • jolley v Sutton - what may not pose a threat to an adult may be very dangerous to a child
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Variations in the standard of care for experts

A
  • S2(2) + s2(3)(b) - occupier may expect a person in the exercise of his calling will appreciate and guard against any special risk ordinarily incident to it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define a contractor

A
  • someone who works or provides a service for a company for a limited period of time, but is not an employee
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What 3 things must the occupier prove for torts of independent contractors

A
  • must have been reasonable for the occupier to have entrusted the work to the independent contractor
  • contractor must be competent to carry out the task
  • if possible, occupier must inspect the work (Woodward v the mayor of Hastings)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Outline contributory negligence as a partial defence to an OLA claim under the 1957 act

A
  • contributory negligence - claimant is partly responsible for their injuries. It must be proven that C acted unreasonably
    . if successful, damages reduced according to the law reform act 1945
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Outline consent (volenti) as a partial defence to an OLA claim under the 1957 act

A
  • set out in S1(6) of OLA 1957
  • claimant accepts voluntary risk of harm if they had knowledge of the risk, free choice and voluntarily accepted it
  • stermer v Lawson
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Outline warning notices as a complete defence to an OLA claim under the 1957 act

A
  • warning can be oral or written
  • must enable ‘the visitor to be reasonably safe’ (s2)4)) of the 1957 act
  • Rae v Marrs LTD
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly