psychiatric injury Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what is psychiatric injury?

A

also know as nervous shock, its a severe long term mental injury which is more than shock or grief

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is the first thing to be established?

A

negligence by D, duty of care breach of duty and damage (mental injury)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

mental injury?

A

must be long term that affects C (can’t go to work)
must come from a sudden event, sufficiently dangerous that C is affected by it
medical evidence
c to show past and future loss of earnings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

case that made distinction between primary and secondary V’s

A

page v smith

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is a primary v

A

involved in accident and suffered physical/mental/both harm

they have to prove negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is a secondary v

A

not involved in accident but suffered mental injury as result of what they saw, heard at scene or aftermath
need to prove negligence, alcock criteria and threshold test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is the alcock criteria

A

Alcock v chief constable of west yorkshire

1) C had to have close ties of love and affection with v so their relationship was a) close type of relationship (by blood) and b) relationship close in fact. mcloughlin v O’brien
2) c suffered mental injuries at scene of accident or in immediate aftermath, not defined but in 2 hr period mcloughlin v o’brien
3) c suffered through their unaided senses so they saw, heard scene or aftermath, shock through tv or phone not sufficient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

threshold test?

A

person of reasonable fortitude would have suffered same reaction and injury as c

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

who are rescuers

A

those actively involved in helping vs of accident

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

will rescuers have a claim?

A

likely they will chadwich v british rail, they are primary vs, courts don’t want to discourage recuing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

hale v london underground

A

proffessional rescuers who put themselves at risk will be able to claim, primary vs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

rescuers and secondary vs

A

if rescuer does not put themselves in risk of harm, they are secondary and will have to satisfy alcock
white v chief constable of south yorkshire

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

who are bystanders

A

witnesses to an accident, aftermath who do not help
not able to claim unless satisfy alcock
mcfarlane v ee caledonia
trivial assistance will not make them rescuer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

property owners

A

attia v british gas
shock of witnessing house burn down allowed
ds at fault, morally right they compensate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

near missers

A

people who are close to scene of accident and suffered mental, physical injuries
regarded as primary, must prove d negligent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

gradual shock

A

claim to those who suffer mental injury through gradual appreciation of events rather than sudden shock
sion v hampstead (not allowed, gradual decline in sons condition)
north glamorgan nhs v walters (shorter period of decline so claim allowed)