psychiatric harm Flashcards

1
Q

what must be proven in order for psychiatric injury to be qualified

A

recognised diagnosed psychiatric injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what must be the RDPI be supported by

A

medical evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

mere emotions insufficient but may be combined with RDPI as in what case

A

vernon v bosley

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what case stated rescuers can claim for pych injury on policy grounds

A

alcock

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what case applied this

A

chadwick

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

rescuers can qualify as primary victims according to what case

A

white v ccsy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what case applied this

A

hale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is a primary victim

A

directly affected by incident and in danger of suffering foreseeable pi

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what 2 cases applied as primary victims

A

page v smith, dulieu v white

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is a secondary victim

A

not directly affected by incident and not in danger of foreseeable pi

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what applies if primary victim

A

ordinary rules of negligence as if PI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what case set out 3 rules for secondary victims which must be satisfied

A

alcock

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is the first rule under alcock

A
  1. Close ties of love and affection- presumed for spouses and parent/child relationships but must be proved for others
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is the second rule under alcock

A
  1. Present at event or immediate aftermath
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

when did the second rule apply and when didn’t it

A

did in hospital in mcloughlin v o’brien,

didn’t in morgue in taylor v somerset ha

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is the third rule under alcock

A
  1. Must learn of event though his own unaided senses (unless clearly identified on TV- Alcock)
17
Q

when does white v ccsy say harm is reasonable

A

reasonably foreseeable to a person of reasonable fortitude and phlegm

18
Q

HARM MUST BE CAUSED BY A SINGLE TRAUMATIC EVENT. WHAT ARE THE 2 CONTRASTING CASES WHICH CAUSED CONTROVERSY IN THIS CONSIDERATION

A

successful for 36 hours in walters, unsuccessful for 2 weeks in sion v hampstead ha