private nuisance Flashcards
what case stated D must have proprietary interest
hunter v cw
what is private nuisance defined as
“an unlawful and indirect interference with a person’s use or enjoyment of land or some right over or in connection with it”
what case said there can be minor physical damage
St helens smelting v tipping
what are the 6 competing interests of C and D the court will consider
- locality
- social use
- duration
- time
- malice
- sensitive use
what 2 cases consider locality
sturges v bridgeman
laws v florinplace- sex shop
what did thesiger LJ say in sturges v birsgeman concerning the character of the area
what would be a nuisance in Belgrave Square would not necessarily be in Bermondsey
what 2 cases considered social use
- Miller v Jackson- cricket club was socially useful
* Adams v Ursell- chippy was not
what 2 cases considered duration
- Tetley v Chitty- must be regular and ongoing as with go-karts
- Kimbolton v Crown River Cruises- although one-off can be if damage occurs as with 20 minute firework display
what case considered the time of the nuisance
• De Keyser’s Hotel v Spicer Bros- unreasonable time as builders work disturbed guests sleep
what 2 cases did malice and motive apply for
- Hollywood Silver Fox Farm v Emmett- farmer fired gun to disturb mating livestock
- Christie v Davey- banging trays in response to piano playing
what 2 cases where considered too sensitive a use
- Robinson v Kilvert- making delicate brown paper was too sensitive
- Bridlington Relay ltd v YEB- TV signal reception was too sensitive
what are the 5 defences to nuisance
o Prescription- 20 yrs without complaint (when moved in)- Sturges v Bridgeman
o Act of a stranger- out of control- Perry v Kendricks
o Social Use- Miller v Jackson
o Planning permission doesn’t give permission to do what you want- Gillingham
obligation under statutory authority
what are the remedies to a successful claim under nuisance
prohibitory injunction
partial injunction
damages in lieu
what case was a partial injunction imposed
Kennaway v Thompson- leisure activities on lake limited
what 2 cases where damages in lieu given
unfair to grant injunction so compensation given- Miller v Jackson, Hatton v UK (national importance pilots testing)