Psych last exam! Flashcards
Attribution theory
people seek to explain their own and other ppl’s behavior by attributing causes of that behvavior to a situation or a disposition
Situational attribution-
identify cause of an action by something in the situation or environment
Dispositional attribution-
identify the cause of an action as something in the person
Fundamental attribution error
overestimate personality traits as a cause of behavior and underestimate the influence of the situation
Better-than-average effect:
bias to believe that we are better than average
Just world hypothesis:
the bias to believe that the world is fair (can lead to victim blaming)
Self-fulfilling prophecy
when a persons first impression (or expectation) affects one’s behavior, and that affects the other ppl’s behavior leading one to “confirm” the initial impression or expectation
False consensus effect
tendency to project the self-concept onto the social world
Naive realism
our perceptions of reality are accurate, that we see things accurately
Dunning-Kruger effect
when a person’s lack of knowledge and skill in a certain area causes them to overestimate their own competence
attitudes
belief about ppl, groups or ideas
familiarity effect
tendency to hold positive attitudes toward familiar ppl and things (repeatedly exposing ppl to a name or product makes them like it more)
Elaboration likelihood model:
2 routes by which persuasive communications can produce attitude change
- central route: facts, info
- peripheral route:
**there’s also foot-in-the-door and door-in-the-face
Cognitive dissonance
state of tension that occurs when a person simultaneously holds two beliefs that are in conflict with each-other
- can cause justification of problematic behavior
- minimization
- dismissing evidence
Norms
rules and expectations that regulate social life (explicit laws and implicit cultural conventions)
Milgram experiment
experimenter, teacher, learner (who was an actor not an actual participant)
- every time the learner got it wrong the teacher would have to press a button to shock the learner
- the question was “how far would a random student go?”
- demonstrates the authority figure complex (the experimenter says its ok so the teacher would keep going)
when were the teachers more likely to disobey in the milgram experiment? (5)
- when the victim was in the same room
- when 2 different experimenters said different things
- when the person ordering them to continue was not an authority figure
- when participants worked with fellow teachers who refused to go further (they often gained the courage to disobey)
- if the experimenter left, teachers would pretend they followed orders but didn’t
Conformity
due to a need for social acceptance or the need for information (ice bucket challenge to raise money for ALS)
Social loafing
when an individual puts less effort into working on a task with others
Social facilitation
when one’s performance is affected by the presence of others
group think
decision-making problem in which group members avoid arguments and strive for agreement
Bystander effect
an individual is less likely to help when they percieve that others are not helping
diffusion of responsibility
reduced personal responsibility that a person feels when more people are present in a situation
Pluralistic ignorance
we often look to others for cues to the acceptable social response, and if we see that others are not responding to the situation