Psych Exam Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Park and Rothbart (1982) AIM

A

Investigate if people would show in-group bias and create broad generalizations about people in an out-group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Park and Rothbart (1982) PROCEDURE

A

Research was conducted on 3 sororities at the University of Oregon that was similar in proximity and values. 90 participants total (30 from each) answered a questionnaire in which they had to rank their sorority and another sorority on ten dimensions: studious, physical attractiveness, economic status, group cohesion, strictness, etc. Responses were ranked on a 7-point scale, ranging from 0- not at all characteristics to 7- extremely characteristic. Participants were also asked to rate on a 9-point scale how similar people were within their sorority + how similar were people in an opposing sorority. 9 - extremely similar to 0- extremely dissimilar

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Park and Rothbart (1982) FINDINGS

A

All three sorority members viewed their sorority members as being more dissimilar and perceived the out-group members as more similar to one another. This is known as the out-group homogeneity effect. The results also showed that each sorority member ranked their sorority high in favorable characteristics such as physical attractiveness and ranked these low when assessing out-groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Park and Rothbart (1982) CONCLUSION

A

People generalize out-groups unfavorably and demonstrate an in-group bias. Out-group homogeneity effect can aid in the creation of stereotypes, as there is a preconceived notion about a group of people. Also demonstrates positive distinctiveness as participants show in-group favoritism and out-group discrimination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Social Identity Theory

A

Social identity theory is a theory of intergroup conflict and aims to explain why conflict and discrimination occur as a result of social categorization, identification, social comparison, and positive distinctiveness. The theory is rooted in the premise that there exist two different types of self. There is a social identity (in terms of social groups) and personal identity (the more individual and private self). The theory links social identity and conflict through various mechanisms.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Social Categorization

A

the existence of social identities based on social groups lead to social categorization - the cognitive process of categorizing people into in-groups and out-groups based on a particular characteristic.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Social Identification

A

Identification is when members identify themselves as a member of a social group and take on their values and beliefs. Some of these groups such as nationality are by default, while others are by choice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Social Comparison

A

in identifying with a social group, this distinction leads to a highly related process of making direct comparisons between your group (the in-group) and other groups (the out-group)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Positive Distinctiveness

A

to achieve a positive social identity and increase self-esteem, members of a group will typically strive to make themselves better (positive) and different (distinct) from out-groups. Positive distinctiveness lead to actions that typically perpetuate out-group discrimination (disadvantages for the out-group) and in-group favouritism (bias towards the benefits of the in-group). Can also result in the out-group homogeneity effect: perceiving out-group members as being more similar to one another than in-group members. This can lead to stereotypes and similar poor treatment of out-group members. As a result, conflict is caused by our desire to create a positive social identity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Kearney and Levine (2014) AIM

A

Assess the impact of the show “16 and pregnant” on teen sexual behaviour and the rate of teen pregnancy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Kearney and Levine (2014) PROCEDURE

A

The reality TV show follows the lives of pregnant teenagers during the final months of their pregnancy. Identified geographic areas (e.g. particular cities) where the show “16 and pregnant” was particularly popular. Measured whether these geographic areas had a greater reduction in teen pregnancy compared to other areas where the show was not as popular. Also analyzed Google searches immediately following a new episode of “16 and pregnant”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Kearney and Levine (2014) FINDINGS

A

Areas where the show was popular, had a greater reduction (4.3%) in teen pregnancy compared with other areas in the 18 months following the initial airing. After the show there typically was a spike in Google searched for terms such as “how to get birth control”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Kearney and Levine (2014) CONCLUSION

A

The show had a positive impact in reducing the rate of teen pregnancy. Supports the idea of vicarious learning as viewers were discouraged from having children at a young age because of how challenging it is.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Socialization

A

the process of becoming a member of a social group by providing the individual with the skills, habits, and norms necessary for participating within their society.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Primary Socialization

A

a child learns the basic rules and norms of living in his or her group. Typically this begins at the most basic level in the family, school, and peer groups.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Secondary Socialization

A

includes elements of the larger community, extended family, and the media. Such forces tend to influence adherence to or deviance from norms indirectly. Developed by Albert Bandura, the theory is an attempt to explain how we learn from others and how socialization, the transmission of cultural norms, occurs. Contrary to behaviorist theory that states all learning is from direct experience of rewards and punishments, Bandura suggested learning can also be done through observational learning - learning through the observation of others. Bandura recognized that certain conditions are necessary for observational learning to take place: Attention, Retention, Motivation, and Potential

17
Q

Attention

A

observers must attend the modelled behaviour. This is typically achieved if the observer can closely identify with the model and are from the same in-group

18
Q

Retention

A

behavior must be consistent and easy to remember

19
Q

Motivation

A

observers must want to reproduce the behavior and expect a certain outcome from it or avoid a certain consequence

20
Q

Potential

A

observers must physically and/or mentally be able to carry out the behavior. There needs to be a level of self-efficacy - a belief one can master particular skills or behavior

21
Q

Stereotype

A

a preconceived notion about a group of people. They tend to be generalizations about entire groups. This differs from prejudice which is a preconceived negative belief about an individual based on their group membership and discrimination which is negative behavior based on a stereotype or prejudice. Rooted in two underlying cognitive processes: 1. Categorization: placing people into a category based on an attribute 2. Generalization: applying a belief to all members of a group

Stereotypes may form indirectly as a product of culture and society, in which gatekeepers, peers, and/or media, can have an impact in creating and/or reinforcing stereotypes. Stereotypes may also form directly as a result of our own experience with other people. The grain of truth hypothesis - suggests that stereotypes are based on small truths people have experienced. For example, having a male doctor and believing all doctors are male. Both these theories are further reinforced by ideas of the out-group homogeneity effect, which describes how we perceive out-group members as being more similar to another than an in-group members. This makes it easier for stereotypes and generalizations to form. Lastly, stereotypes may be made from illusory correlations which is when people see two variables as related when they are not. For example, perceived correlations between a group and a trial and/or behaviour are exaggerated, despite being statistically less frequent.

22
Q

Self-fulfilling prophecy

A

people unconsciously change their behaviour, causing a schema to become true. The stereotype may be positive or negative.

23
Q

Stereotype threat

A

members of the stereotyped group may inadvertently reinforce a negative stereotype by changing their behavior as a result of increased anxiety and apprehension. Therefore, causing the negative schema to become true

24
Q

Rosenthal and Jacobson (1968) AIM

A

Investigate whether students of whom greater intellectual growth is expected will show greater intellectual growth

25
Q

Rosenthal and Jacobson (1968) PROCEDURE

A

320 students, grades 1 to 6. Teachers in the school were told that certain students were expected to be “growth superstars”, based on the results of their IQ tests. In reality, the test was fictitious and students were chosen at random

26
Q

Rosenthal and Jacobson (1968) FINDINGS

A

In the year of the experiment, control-group students gained an average of 8.4 IQ points, while students from the experimental group gained 12.2 IQ points. Amon grade 1 students, the average gain of the superstars was 27.4 IQ points in comparison to the average of 12 IQ points

27
Q

Rosenthal and Jacobson (1968) CONCLUSION

A

Changes in teachers’ expectations produce changes in students’ achievement. Stereotypes we have about other people may affect their behaviour through the process of self-fulfilling prophecy

28
Q

Berry and Katz (1967) AIM

A

Investigate whether cultural differences in individualism vs collectivism affect conformity

29
Q

Berry and Katz (1967) PROCEDURE

A

Participants were from the Temne people of Sierra Leone and Inuit people from Northern Canada. The Inuits are regarded as an individualist society as people are responsible for their survival. In comparison, individuals from Sierra Leone are regarded as a collectivist society as individuals rely on each other for food sharing. Conformity was measured using the Asch paradigm: participants were shown a series of lines of varying lengths. Participants are then asked to identify which of the other lines of equal length to the target line. As participants shared their answers, others are told to purposely give the wrong answer. The goal is to see if participants will pick the correct answer or conform with the group even though it is wrong. There were 18 trials, 12 of which were answered incorrectly by the confederates.

30
Q

Berry and Katz (1967) FINDINGS

A

The Temne people from Sierra Leone had a significant tendency to accept the suggestion of the group and select the incorrect response. The Inuit people were mostly unaffected by the suggestion of the majority

31
Q

Berry and Katz (1967) CONCLUSION

A

Individualist Inuit participants conform less often than the collectivist Temne because of cultural values of individualism. This is because conformity to group norms is ingrained as a cultural value in the Temne society, which depends on tight social relations. Culture has an impact on how individuals read the situation and how to best behave

32
Q

Culture

A

Culture is the set of attitudes, behaviours, and symbols shared by a large group of people, usually communicated from one generation to the next. Cultural groups are characterized by distinct norms and conventions - the unwritten rules and standards that tell us appropriate behavior, beliefs, values, and attitudes. The origins of culture can be explained by evolution, as culture is a response of a group of people to the demands of their environment.

33
Q

Surface culture

A

aspects of a culture that can be easily observed such as behaviors, customs, and traditions.

34
Q

Deep culture

A

the cognitive elements of a culture such as gender roles, rules, and values that are not easily observed. This is often the focus of psychology. The influence of culture on cognition can be explained by a motivation to conform to the norms of potential observers. So the motivation to conform to cultural norms is how culture influences cognition. Such pressure can vary from one culture to the next and therefore impact behavior.

35
Q

Cultural dimension

A

a group of related cultural values which includes rankings at opposite ends of the spectrum. Such dimensions provide criteria to compare differences in values between cultures. Geert Hofstede (1973) conducted an extensive study involving over 100, 000 participants from more than 70 countries and identified 6 dimensions of culture to help explain patterns of human behavior across cultures.

36
Q

Ethic approach

A

refers to studying cultures from an outside perspective which enables cross-cultural comparisons.
An example of a cultural dimension is individualism vs. collectivism - which determines whether individuals prioritize themselves or the group when making decisions.

37
Q

Power Distance Index (PDI)

A

a higher PDI means the more powerful are firmly established and are rarely questioned.

38
Q

Masculinity vs. Femininity

A

masculine values include autonomy and competitiveness; feminine values include modesty and compassion