Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

SFU: Spring 2016 > PSYC260: Midterm #1 > Flashcards

PSYC260: Midterm #1 Flashcards

1
Q

Difference between anthropology/sociology and social psychology

A

Anthro/socio=how people are influenced by their social enviro

Social psych=how people are influenced by their interpretation (aka construal) of their social enviro

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Naïve realism

A

Special kind of construal
We all believe that we see things “as they really are” and that other reasonable people see things the same way we do
Lee Ross

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Social psychology

A

The scientific study of the way that people’s thoughts/feelings/behaviours are influenced by the real or imagined presence of other people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Social psych vs sociology

A

Both: influence of social and societal factors on human behaviour

Diffs:

  • level of analysis: individual in the context of a social situations vs society at large
  • what they are trying to explain: goal of social psych is to identify universal properties of human nature that make everyone susceptible to social influence (regardless of class/culture)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Social psych vs personality psych

A

Focus of attention of individual differences instead of recognizing the power of social influence involved

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Fundamental attribution error

A

Tendency to overestimate the extent to which people’s behaviour stems from internal, dispositional factors and to underestimate the role of situational forces

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Hindsight bias

A

Tendency for people to exaggerate how much they could have predicted something after knowing it occurred

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Three methods used to answer questions in social psych

A

1- observational method
2- correlational method
3- experimental method

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Theory vs hypothesis

A

Theory: organized set of principles that can be used to explain observed phenomena

Hypothesis: testable statement or idea about the relationship between two or more variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Diffusion of responsibility

A

Bystanders less likely to do something if there are others around to shift responsibility to

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Operational definition

A

Precise specification of how variables are measured or manipulated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Observational method

A

Technique where researcher observes people and systematically records measurements of their behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Ethnography

A

Method by which researchers attempt to understand a group or culture by observing it from the inside without imposing any preconceived notions they might have

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Interjudge reliability

A

The level of agreement between 2+ people who independently observe and code a set of data; by showing that two or more judges independently come up with the same observations, researchers ensure that the observations are not the subjective impressions of one individual

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Archival analysis

A

Form of the observational method where the researcher examines accumulated docs or archives of a culture like diaries, novels, magazines, etc
-looking back can teach a lot about how people viewed themselves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Correlational method

A

Technique where researchers systematically measure two or more variables and assess the relation between them (aka how much one can be predicted by the other)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Correlation coefficient

A

Statistic that assesses how well you can predict one variable based on another (aka how well you can predict people’s weight from their height)
Expressed as numbers ranging from -1.00 to +1.00 (two variables perfectly correlated in a positive direction vs a negative direction)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Surveys

A

Research in which a representative sample of people are asked questions about their attitudes of behaviour

  • advantages: convenient, looks at variables that are hard to observe, sample representative segments of the population
  • potential problem: accuracy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Random selection

A

Way of ensuring that a sample of people is representative of a population, by giving everyone in the population an equal chance of being selected for the sample

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Hindsight bias

A

Tendency for people to exaggerate how much they could have predicted the outcome after knowing that it occurred

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Three methods used to study social psych

A

1- observational method
2- correlational method
3- experimental method

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Theory vs hypothesis

A

Theory= organized set of principles that can be used to explain observed phenomena

Hypothesis= a testable statement or idea about the relationship between two or more variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Diffusion of responsibility

A

When more people around, responsibility is spread out and people don’t feel as much need to do something

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Operational definition

A

Precise specification of how variables are measured or manipulated
Ex: defining bullying as power imbalance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Observational method

A

The technique whereby a researcher observes people and systematically records measurements of their behaviour
Focus: description
Question: what is the nature of the phenomenon?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Ethnography

A

Method by which researchers attempt to understand a group or culture by observing it from the inside without imposing any preconceived notions they might have

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Interjudge reliability

A

Level of agreement between two or more people who have taken data on the same thing; if they have higher agreement, it shows that there is less bias or subjectivity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Archival analysis

A

A type of observational method

Researcher examines accumulated document or archives of a culture like diaries, novels, magazines, newspapers etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Correlational method

A

Technique whereby researcher systematically measure two or more variable and assess the relation between them (how much one can be predicted from the other)
Focus: description
Question: what is the relation between variable C and variable Y?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Correlation coefficient

A

Statistic that assesses how week you can predict one variable based on another (like how you can predict people’s weight by their height)
Represented from +1.00 to -1.00

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Negative vs positive correlation

A

Positive: both variables go up and down together (ex: height and weight)

Negative: variable moves up, other variable moves down and vice versa (ex: hours of tv watching with GPA)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Surveys

A

Used often in correlational method

Representative sample of people asked questions about their attitudes or behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Random selection

A

A way of ensuring that a sample of people is representative of a population by giving everyone an equal chance of being selected for the sample

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

What’s the main limit of the correlational method?

A

Correlation does not equal causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Experimental method

A

Method in which the researcher randomly assigns participants to different conditions and ensured that these conditions are exactly the same expect for the independent variable (the one thought to have a causal effect of people’s responses)
Focus: causality
Question: does variable Y cause variable X?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Independent vs dependant variable

A

Independent variable: variable a researcher changes or varies to see if it has an effect on some other variable

Dependant variable: measured to see if it is influenced by independent variable; researcher hypothesizes that it will be influenced by the level of the independent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Internal validity

A

Keeping everything about the situation the same except for the independent variable in an experiment
Done by controlled all variables and randomly assigning people to different experimental conditions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

Probability level (p-value)

A

A number, calculated with statistical techniques, that tells researchers how likely it is that the results of their experiment occurred by chance and not because of the independent variables
The convention in science including social psych is that results=significant if the probability level is less than 5 in 100 that the results might be attributable to change factors and not the independent variable studied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

External validity

A

The extent to which the results of a study can be generalized to other situations and to other people
2 kinds: generalizability across people and across situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

Mundane realism

A

To do with external validity

The extent to which an experiment is similar to real life situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

Psychological realism

A

Has to do with external validity
Extent to which the psychological processes triggered in an experiment are similar to psychological processes that occur in every day life; this can be high in an experiment even if mundane realism is low

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

Cover story

A

A description of the purpose of the study is given to participants that is diff than the real purpose; used to maintain psychological realism (external validity)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

Replication

A

Repeating a study, usually with diff subject populations, in diff settings or by using diff methods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

Meta analysis

A

A statistical technique that averages the results of two or more studies to see if the effect of an independent variable is reliable
Similar to p-levels but finds an average from results of many different studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

Basic dilemma of social psychologists

A

The trade off between internal and external validity aka
1- having enough control over situation to ensure that no outside variables are influencing the results and to randomly assign people to conditions
2- ensuring that results = generalizable to everyday life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

What’s one of the best ways to increase external validity?

A

Field experiments aka experiments conducted in a natural setting (not in a lab)

47
Q

Cross cultural research

A

Research conducted with members of diff cultures to see if psychological processes of interest are present across cultures or specific to one culture

48
Q

Two main themes of social psych

A

1- power of the situation

2- importance of subjective construal

49
Q

Two main methods of measurement in social psych

A

1- observation (observe people and record their behaviour)

2- self report (ask people about their psychological states and behaviours; PRIMARY METHOD in social psych)

50
Q

Automatic thinking vs controlled thinking

A

Automatic: thinking that’s non conscious, unintentional, involuntary and effortless

Controlled: the opposite ^

51
Q

Schemas

A

Mental structures that people use to organize their knowledge about the social world around themes or subjects
Influences the info people notice, think about and remember
Can be negative (stereotypes)
Content of Schemas affected by our culture

52
Q

What neurological disorder creates problems forming Schemas ?

A

Korsakov’s syndrome

53
Q

Accessibility

A

The extent to which Schemas and concepts are at the front of people’s minds and are therefore likely to be used when making judgments about the social world

54
Q

Three reasons that Schemas can be accessible

A

1- past experience
2- related to current goal
3- recent experiences

55
Q

Priming

A

The process where recent experiences increase the accessibility of a Schema, trait or concept
Example of automatic thinking

56
Q

Self-fulfilling prophecy

A

Where someone has an expectation for what another person is like, which influences how they act towards that person, which then causes that person to behave consistently with their original expectation

57
Q

Judgemental heuristics

A

Mental shortcuts people use to make judgements quickly and efficiently

58
Q

Availability heuristic

A

Mental shortcut where people base a judgement on the ease with which they can bring something to mind

59
Q

Representativeness heuristic

A

A mental shortcut where people classify something according to how similar it is to a typical case

60
Q

Base rate information

A

Info about the frequency of members of diff categories in the population
Typically not used very well when making assumptions about people

61
Q

Counterfactual thinking

A

Mentally changing some aspect of the past as a way of imagining what might have been
Usually when a negative event happens and one feels that they were very close to it not happening

62
Q

Thought suppression

A

The attempt to avoid thinking about something a person would rather forget
Two processes:
1- monitoring process=searches for evidence that the unwanted thought is about to be detected by consciousness (automatic)
2- operating process=conscious attempt to distract oneself from thinking about the bad thought (controlled)

63
Q

Overconfidence barrier

A

The barrier that happens when people have too much confidence in the accuracy of their judgements; people’s judgements usually aren’t as correct as they think they are

64
Q

One way to possibly avoid the overconfidence barrier

A

Studying statistics (even a one day course helps!)
Hopefully student will apply to real life
Doesn’t always work

65
Q

Analytic vs holistic thinking style

A

Analytic: type of thinking where people focus on properties of objects without considering their surrounding context (common in western culture)

Holistic: type of thinking where people focus on overall context, particularly in ways which objects relate to one another (common in East Asian cultures like China Japan Korea etc)

66
Q

Attribution theory

A

A description of the way in which people explain the causes of their own and other people’s behaviour
Father of this theory: Fritz heider

67
Q

Internal vs external attribution (attribution theory)

A

Internal attribution: inference that a person is behaving a certain way because of something about him or her (like attitude character personality etc)

External: person is behaving a certain way because of something about the situation they’re in (assumption that most people would respond the same way)

68
Q

Covariation model (attribution theory)

A

Theory stating that to form an attribution about what caused a persons behaviour, we systematically note the pattern between the presence (or absence) of positive causal factors and whether or not the behaviour occurs

69
Q

Three key types of info used to form an attribution

A

1- consensus info: info about the extent to which other people behave to the same stimulus

2- distinctiveness info: refers to how the person responds to other stimuli

3- consistency info: refers to the frequency with which the observed behaviour between the same person and the same stimulus occurs across time and circumstances

70
Q

Counterfactual thinking

A

Mentally changing some aspect of the past as a way of imagining what might have been
Usually when a negative event happens and one feels that they were very close to it not happening

71
Q

Thought suppression

A

The attempt to avoid thinking about something a person would rather forget
Two processes:
1- monitoring process=searches for evidence that the unwanted thought is about to be detected by consciousness (automatic)
2- operating process=conscious attempt to distract oneself from thinking about the bad thought (controlled)

72
Q

Overconfidence barrier

A

The barrier that happens when people have too much confidence in the accuracy of their judgements; people’s judgements usually aren’t as correct as they think they are

73
Q

One way to possibly avoid the overconfidence barrier

A

Studying statistics (even a one day course helps!)
Hopefully student will apply to real life
Doesn’t always work

74
Q

Analytic vs holistic thinking style

A

Analytic: type of thinking where people focus on properties of objects without considering their surrounding context (common in western culture)

Holistic: type of thinking where people focus on overall context, particularly in ways which objects relate to one another (common in East Asian cultures like China Japan Korea etc)

75
Q

Attribution theory

A

A description of the way in which people explain the causes of their own and other people’s behaviour
Father of this theory: Fritz heider

76
Q

Internal vs external attribution (attribution theory)

A

Internal attribution: inference that a person is behaving a certain way because of something about him or her (like attitude character personality etc)

External: person is behaving a certain way because of something about the situation they’re in (assumption that most people would respond the same way)

77
Q

Covariation model (attribution theory)

A

Theory stating that to form an attribution about what caused a persons behaviour, we systematically note the pattern between the presence (or absence) of positive causal factors and whether or not the behaviour occurs

78
Q

Three key types of info used to form an attribution

A

1- consensus info: info about the extent to which other people behave to the same stimulus

2- distinctiveness info: refers to how the person responds to other stimuli

3- consistency info: refers to the frequency with which the observed behaviour between the same person and the same stimulus occurs across time and circumstances

79
Q

Correspondence bias

A

The tendency to infer that people’s behaviour corresponds to or matches their disposition (personality)
Aka fundamental attribution error

80
Q

Perceptual salience

A

Info that is the focus of people’s attention; people tend to overestimate the causal role of perceptually salient info

81
Q

Two-step process of attribution

A

First part: analyzing a persons behaviour by making an automatic internal attribution

Second part: thinking about possible situational reasons for the behaviour after which one may ADJUST the original internal attribution (may be culturally specific)

82
Q

Actor/observer difference

A

The tendency to see other people’s behaviour being caused by something about them or their personality, whereas when explaining ones own behaviour, one focuses on situational factors

83
Q

Self-serving attributions

A

Explanations for one’s successes that credit internal, personal factors and explanations for one’s failures that blame external, situational factors

84
Q

Defensive attributions

A

Explanations for behaviour that avoid feelings of vulnerability and mortality

85
Q

Belief in a just world

A

A form of defensive attribution wherein people assume that bad things happen to bad people and that good things happen to good people

86
Q

Encode vs decode (nonverbal communication)

A

Encode: to express or emit nonverbal behaviour like smiling or patting someone on the back

Decode: to interpret the meaning of the nonverbal behaviour other people express, such as deciding that a pat on the back was an expression of condescension and not kindness

87
Q

Darwin’s ideas about nonverbal communication and facial expression

A
  • primary emotions shown on the face are universal
  • nonverbal forms of communication are species specific and not culture specific
  • evolutionary significance in understanding and producing important facial expressions/emotions
88
Q

Affect blend

A

A facial expression in which one part of the face registers one emotion while the another part of the face registers a different emotion

89
Q

Emblems

A

Nonverbal gestures that have well-understood definitions within a given culture; they usually have direct verbal translations such as the “okay” sign 👌🏻

90
Q

Implicit personality theory

A

A type of Schema people use to group various kinds of personality traits together; for example, many people believe that if someone is kind, he or she is also generous

91
Q

Self concept vs self awareness

A

Self concept: the contents of the self aka our knowledge about who we are

Self awareness: the act of thinking about ourselves

92
Q

Self-schemas

A

An organized body of knowledge about the self (ex: attitudes, preferences, traits) that influences what people notice, think about and remember about themselves

93
Q

Self-reference effect

A

People can remember things better if they relate them back to themselves

94
Q

Independent view of the self vs interdependent view of the self

A

Independent: defining yourself in terms of your own internal thoughts, feelings, and actions (not other people’s)

Interdependent: defining yourself in terms of relationships to other people; recognizing the ones behaviour is often determined by the thoughts feelings and actions of others

95
Q

Gender differences in defining the self

A

Women: relational interdependence

Men: collective interdependence

96
Q

Introspection

A

The process where people look inward and examine their own thoughts, feelings and motives

97
Q

Self-awareness theory

A

The idea that when people focus their attention on themselves, they evaluate and compare their behaviour with their internal standards and values

98
Q

Causal theories

A

Theories about the causes of ones own feelings and behaviours; typically, we learn such theories from our culture (ex: absense make the heart grow fonder”)

99
Q

Self-perception theory

A

Theory that when our attitudes and feelings are uncertain or ambiguous, we infer these states by observing our behaviour and the situation in which it occurs

100
Q

Overjustification effect

A

When people view their behaviour as being caused by compelling extrinsic reasons, making them underestimate the extent to which their behaviour was caused by intrinsic reasons

101
Q

Task contingent vs performance contingent rewards

A

Task contingent rewards: rewards given for performing a task, regardless of how the task is done (participation ribbons)

Performance contingent rewards: rewards based on how well we perform a task

102
Q

Analytic thinking style vs holistic thinking style

A

Analytic: westerners; type of thinking where people focus on the properties of objects without considering their surrounding context

Holistic: East Asian; type of thinking where people focus on the overall context, specifically in ways in which objects relate to each other

103
Q

Schema durability

A

Beliefs stick in our heads, even when proven wrong

104
Q

Primacy effect

A

Shows tendency to over rely on initial info (first impressions) even when more info becomes available

105
Q

Micro-expressions

A

Fleeting, short facial expressions
True emotions sneak out
Easiest to detect in slow mo
Improves with practice

106
Q

Four areas of body language

A

Posture (open vs closed, relaxed vs tense)
Touch
Personal space
Emblems

107
Q

Relationship between liking and mimicry

A

Mimicry leads to liking and vice versa

108
Q

Emotional contagion

A

Two factor theory of emotion
A persons level of arousal determines the intensity of an emotional experience
Specific type of emotional experience determined by contextual clues
Emotion = arousal X cognitive label

109
Q

Misattributional of arousal

A

Because we observe our own behaviour to figure out why we feel aroused, we can make mistakes about where our arousal comes from

110
Q

Excitation transfer theory

A

When residual (leftover) excitation from an earlier event is misattributed as a reaction from a new stimulus

111
Q

Affective forecasting

A

Our guesses about how we will feel in the future following projected events
Two underlying processes:
Focalism
Immune neglect

112
Q

Trait vs state self-esteem

A

Trait: enduring level of self regard

State: dynamic changeable aspect of self evaluation

113
Q

Two types of group based self esteem acts (collective self aspects)

A

BIRGing: basking in reflected glory

CORFing: cutting off reflected failure

SFU: Spring 2016 (9 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions